A "Super Max" Contract For Kyrie Irving?
In October, Kyrie Irving, two-time NBA All-Star, will begin the fourth season of his Rookie Scale Contract. He will therefore, in the language of the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement, be a "5th Year Eligible Player" at the end of the 2014-15 campaign.
As a result, Irving is free to sign an extension with the Cavaliers starting this summer. Kyrie and his agent and the team have through October 31st to come to terms on an agreement. If they do not, Irving will be a free agent after the '14-'15 season unless the Cavs make a qualifying offer of $9.7M - at which point Irving would become a restricted free agent (meaning the Cavaliers would have the option to match any competing contract offers).
No doubt negotiations between Irving's reps and the front office will begin shortly after July 1st. While there is reason to question whether or not Irving is worth a Maximum Contract Extension, the Cavs have to at least play the game. Even owed max money, Kyrie would most likely be easily tradable.
How much money then are the Cavs set to offer the young PG?
Per the CBA, a Maximum Salary Extension for Irving is determined by first calculating 25% of the salary cap at the time the contract is signed. The deal can be up to five years long, with a raise of up to 7.5% of the base year salary per year.
Here then is what the contract would look like based off a projected salary cap of $66.5M in 2015:
(Note that the last year of Irving's Rookie Scale Contract is revised as part of the extension. Irving signing a 5-Year Max Extension would give the Cavs control of his playing rights for four, not five, additional years.)
Irving may actually be eligible to receive a "Super Max" Contract Extension this summer.
What is a "Super Max" Contract Extension?
Notably, the term "Super Max" does not appear in the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement; it appears to be a term that was invented by the press. The term though alludes to a specific section of the CBA that calls for Fifth Year Eligible Players to be eligible for a Maximum Salary worth 30% of the salary cap, instead of 25%, if he meets one of the following criteria (again, directly from the CBA):
(i) the player is named twice to the All-NBA first, second, or third team
(ii) the player is voted in twice as an All-Star starter
(iii) the player is designated once as NBA MVP
Irving, everyone should know, has not yet met any of these criteria. Although he is a two-time All-Star, he was only voted in once; the first time he was selected by the coaches.
Therefore, Irving is not eligible for a Super Max Extension... yet.
Max Extensions for Fifth Year Eligible Players are drawn up in a way to allow for the fact that a player could meet one of the above criteria during his fourth season.
This puts the Cavs in a precarious position.
If the fans vote Irving into the All-Star game this season as a starter, he will meet one of the above-referenced criteria, and his deal will suddenly cost far more than originally planned.
Here's what Irving's contract would look like if he gets the "Super Max:"
The difference is a staggering $19,118,750 over the course of five years.
The result is a perverse incentive for the Cavs to kill any effort by the fans to vote Irving into the All-Star game as a starter - which would force the team to give him the Super Max and therefore eliminate a portion of important cap space that could be used to help build the team moving forward.
Clearly, a winning number of votes for Irving would not make him a better basketball player.
If the Cavs and Irving agree to an extension, then, should the team start an anti-Irving stealth campaign? Maybe it should just root wholeheartedly for a healthy Derek Rose and Rajon Rondo - and for John Wall to continue to get a whole hell of a lot better.