So we can all agree the billionaires are a red herring, yeah? They probably know more than they're letting on but it's wayyy too early for any of them to be The Killer.

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Jordan

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
So we can all agree the billionaires are a red herring, yeah? They probably know more than they're letting on but it's wayyy too early for any of them to be The Killer.
***spoilers for 4x01 of Only Murders in the Building***
.
.
.
we need to remember that Sazz was not the intended target, Charles was. whatever Sazz was researching in her apartment led to Charles, not the other way around.
also, someone else was definitely in Charles' apartment and it wasn't a ghost. it also wasn't the killer, because the killer isn't a friend of Charles' (allegedly), and the hidden person was doing kind things for Charles.
the "ghost" turned off the t.v. for Charles
the "ghost" started making tea for Charles
the "ghost" closed the door for Charles after the others came inside
i think this is another case of the secret passageway being used, potentially Lucy again but i doubt it.
the question isn't: who would kill Sazz? it's: who would kill Charles, and how could Sazz have discovered the threat? this leads me to my first theory of the season: the killer was someone in Hollywood who wanted something to do with the upcoming podcast movie and/or future projects concerning Charles -- and they didn't want to have to buy the rights of his life story. the killer is probably someone we already met in LA during this first episode.
I joked about Algie being implicated, but...
Unless Randall is secretly psychotic, he is not responsible for the deranged "die Lester die" carving. I would bet money that it's the work of a child, and not a particularly well-adjusted one at that.
Why else would they focus on him carving a 'shiv'? And come on, they went to Jamba Juice? As if that little fucker has ever tasted sugar in his woeful life.
Not that I necessarily believe Algie killed Lester... but he was definitely there. His dad probably made Lester keep him away from the casino, hence his unbridled rage. It's likely that he breached containment and was at the fountain when Lester fell in (which is why Bash removed the footage).
Theory: Ben Glenroy was not talking to anyone in that video clip. He was talking to the cookies that ended up poisoning him.
We saw in episode 1 that cookies are his weakness, and I don't see him saying to a person "you're so bad" and "I want you". It would also explain why we don't hear anyone speak back to him.
also maybe Tobert is the one who put the cookies there and also his camera at the exact right angle to get the convo and not the other angle
@ anon stop me if this isn't the footage you were talking about
(Discussion about possible Theo sighting in the leaked spoilery Arconia courtyard video.)
So I've been thinking over @moonxliqht theory and I wonder, what if no one killed Ben at all?
He "died " and came back to life as per his plan to make his documentary more exciting ( like Moon said)
I mean think about it , he came in right after he was saved an casually let out his thoughts on who had beef with him at a party as an excuse to seek forgiveness and change his ways?
Could be his way of trying to gain some momentum into the whole " who tried to kill the star " plan in order to get more media coverage and buzz around the the whole production.
And later on he probably got into a fight with someone , maybe his brother/manager or Clifford and his mom about the whole thing. Or maybe even Kim because she didn't like how he talked to her in front of everybody.
And during the fight the accidently fell.
It wasn't an intentional murder, it just happened.
Could be a new twist to have someone just die accidently rather than someone actually killing him.
Btw I don't think Mabel will lose the apartment. Its possible the new tenants back out with all the murders that happen in the building and she ends of staying for a little while longer.
⚠️Only murders in the building spoilers ahead⚠️
I do believe it was Donna that poisoned Ben, but I don't believe she pushed him. I think it was Cliff. If it wasn't Cliff, it was probably Tobert.
I am not really sure what their motives would be. Maybe Cliff was also just trying to protect his first show, like his mother was. Maybe he was fed up with how Ben treated him. Maybe he knew that his mother had poisoned Ben so he pushed him to protect her.
And maybe Tobert was bitter over being fired. Maybe Ben knew something about Tobert and was blackmailing him. I have absolutely nothing to back that second theory of Toberts motive. He is just so freaking suspicious and he is clearly hiding something.
I have no idea if I am right though. We'll see next week.
Alright, I have a lot of thoughts about what's happened so far in the new Only Murders in the Building season, and I just can't wait until the next episode airs to talk about it.
There are a lot of spoilers below the cut. I may have gotten a little carried away with how long this post became.