Late night conspiracies: Gravity Falls predictions.
So Hirsch has once again dropped a bombshell on us. We now know that someone's gonna bite the dust by the end of season two, but the big question is who is it gonna be? I'm putting on my tinfoil hat for the moment, cause I was never one to sit idly and wait for something like this to be revealed.
Firstly, it's safe to assume it's gonna be one of the main characters, for the simple reason that it's what's gonna leave the biggest impact on the audience. We all know Hirsch isn't afraid to traumatise us, or to push past any and all borders of disney censorship,(I mean have you seen the show?) so we can assume he won't be afraid of killing off someone important if it serves a purpose to the story. Thus it's most likely gonna be one of the characters represented on the wheel
SO, who's it gonna be?
First, for the sake of laziness, let's quickly shorten the list of suspects. Who is it least likely to be?
I'm thinking these four;
Pacifica Northwest, Jesus Ramirez, Gideon Gleeful and Robert Valentino
My main reason for doubting it being Pacifica or Gideon is because I seriously doubt that even Hirsch would kill off a small child without explicit reason to do so (see: Mabel or especially Dipper).
Gideon has not been featured explicitly this season, and I doubt unless any changes occur, there would be any reason to kill him off now.
Furthermore, Pacifica has just stepped onto the road of redemption for all she has done, and I think it's too early for her to be killed off. The same would go for Robbie. From being a minor antagonist to dipper in the last season, they are just starting to show him in a sympathetic light, it would be too early for him to be killed off.
Lastly, Soos. I have no good arguments to offer against it, other than the fact that there are characters more likely to die.
Mabel Pines, Wendy Corduroy and Stanley Pines
(Yes, I'm working on the assumption that the Pines Twin Theory is correct, and that this is, in fact, Stanley)
Let's start with Mabel. Actually, Mabel might have fit better in on the first list of most unlikely. I find it unlikely for her to get killed off, firstly for the same reason as Gideon and Pacifica, because she is a child, secondly, she is a main character, and thirdly, because Dipper would rather die (or strike a deal with a demon??) than to let anything happen to her. (I do realise that is a terrible reason, but once again, there are characters more likely to bite the dust).
Which brings us to Wendy. Why is she on the list of more likely characters to die? Foreshadowing.
Remember this?
Yeah, it wasn't actually Wendy, and the purpose of the scene is resolving the Dipper/Wendy plotline, but it was quite a strong/disturbing scene. Gravity Falls is known for it's impressive degree of foreshadowing, so could this be such a thing? Could an equally sad, permanent faith be awaiting Wendy?
Not very likely, but it's fun to speculate.
Now, how about Stanley?
There are not a lot of things to go on here, seeing how we don't even know if he's real. But here's a few things. First off, he's an adult, which immediately makes it more likely for him to get killed off than any of the younger characters. Secondly, if he does exist, the viewers don't have a strong connection to him, and it might be less traumatising if he does die. Nor will it upset the overall story and character dynamic for later seasons. So Stanley is a solid maybe. Sorry dude.
Now, for the most likely candidates.
Dipper Pines, Stanford Pines and Fiddleford McGucket
First off, Dipper. Okay, so do I honestly think they're gonna kill off Dippingsauce? No, not at all. But I DO think he is in very hot water, with all his digging into things that are way bigger than him. There is a discussion going on about how he is starting to act more and more like Bill, striking suspicious deals, lying or telling half-truths, tricking people etc etc (take a look at the post, it's an interesting read). And I do really think that this will become important.
Another thing, there has been a lot of near death experiences for Dipper(or things representing dipper i.e. sock puppets) that could be alluding to something happening to him;
One might assume that the shapeshifter's threat has already happened (see: pine dipper) but I do still think it may be significant. I also believe the fact that he almost got maimed by zombies in the first episode might be significant - maybe to show us that the biggest threat to Dipper's life may be his own curiosity? There is no doubt in my mind that he will dig until he uncovers something he shouldn't have. Something that might threaten to truly end him.
But actually dying? I don't think so.
What about Stanford? Well, first off, he's an adult, once again it's more likely for him to get killed off than any of the younger characters. Secondly, there's the foreshadowing throughout the show;
doesn't it seem significant that all depictions of Stan that has appeared, save for Stan himself, has been destroyed in some way? (2/3 times in a fiery inferno OH GOD)
Again, Gravity Falls use foreshadowing a lot, so this seems likely. Also, with the way he's acting, what he's doing, and what the newest trailer tells us, he's up to major stuff. He's been doing weird shit for the last thirty years it looks like. Can he be causing his own undoing?
Maybe so.
Then there's Fiddleford.
Firstly, he's involved in what is going on under the surface in Gravity Falls - at least he was until he lost his mind to the memory erasing device. He is, however, slowly regaining his senses, which means its becoming more likely that he'll get involved in the upcoming situation in a way that might cause him his life. He is an adult, which makes him a more likely candidate, and most importantly, he is new as a main/important character.
He is much more likely to get killed off than Stan because the repercussions won't be as dire. I love McGucket, but let's be real, if Stan is to get killed off, it would unbalance the main cast of characters. Mabel and Dipper would no longer have a caretaker, and they would be shipped back home unless somebody else were to step up and take care of them. Stan dying would be life-altering for the entirety of the show, and I doubt it would fly.
Unless somebody else were to take Stan's place, the person to get killed won't be Stan.
So we're landing on Fiddleford out of shear logic.
I might be totally wrong, but I know a lot of you are thinking the same. McGucket is the logical choice that will have just the right amount of impact.
I worry for the old man.
LAstly, one thing I haven't touched is the fact that Alex Hirsch in his tweet says at least one character. Could there be more than one doomed? What do you guys think about my sleep-deprived, slightly-sick ramblings?












