#pan exclusionist

[lust-for-ultraviolence]

Did you go through a transmedical(transmed) or exclusionist phase?

Yes-transmed

Yes-exclusionist

Yes-both

Neutral

No

I am still a transmed

I am still exclusionist

I am still both

I don’t even know what those are

Voting ended onMay 10, 2024

Transmedicalism is the idea that being transgender is primarily a medical issue related to the incongruence between an individual's assigned sex at birth and their gender identity, characterized by gender dysphori.Many transmedicalists believe individuals who identify as transgender without experiencing gender dysphoria or desiring to undergo a medical transition through methods such as hormone replacement therapy or sex reassignment surgery are not genuinely transgender.They may also exclude those who identify themselves as non-binary from the trans label.

Exclusionist is someone who attempts to gatekeep the LGBT+ community by claiming that certain groups aren't "really" LGBT+ based on their own definition.

Example, asexual people are not lgbt for being asexual, they must be either trans or homo/bi-romantic. A cis het ace is not welcomed into the community. They also usually believe pansexual is a transphobic version of bisexual.

These are shortened definitions.

If this poll causes too much trouble, I’ll delete it.

[artsyshitshow]

Bisexuality, pansexuality, omnisexuality, and polysexuality are valid, actually. They are not biphobic or transphobic in any way, shape, or form.

Stop being a baby about it.

[nao-me-odeio]

bisexuals: i'm proud of myself! i can love whoever i want: cis and trans, enbies, whatever!! i love the fact that my sexuality has such a rich history!

pannies: um sweetie... actually... you CAN'T be bi if you like trans and enbies. you're pan sksksk periodt

bisexuals: well actually... *sends a shit ton amount of sources debunking myths about bisexuality and proving why the label "pansexual" is bad*

pannies:

[vivalabisexualrevolution]

the amount of people that use bisexual and pansexual interchangeably when they want to be included in bisexual pride and/or things meant for bisexuals, but then get butthurt when people say bi and pan are the same is fucking insane. it’s just so hypocritical and really goes to show how much biphobia pan people will excuse. if you’re going to use the label pan and believe it’s different than bi, stop fucking inserting yourself into bisexual pride posts. it’s not a hard concept to grasp. you can’t have it both ways. stop being biphobic hypocrites.

[bisexualjonsims]

any pansexuals want to msg me and like. explain how it’s not biphobic/transphobic ?

[nao-me-odeio]

"let people live"

am i supposed to respect a label that actively harms trans and bi people?

am i supposed to remain quiet and don't talk about how silenced bisexual people get?

am i supposed to support a label that enforces stereotypes that bisexual people are sex machines and don't care about personality at all?

am i supposed to stand your "bi/pan solidarity uwu" when that label actively harms bi people, whether they care or not?

am i supposed to think a label - that promotes the idea that trans is a third gender - is normal and should be considered valid?

am i supposed to like the fact that pannies don't have a rich and beautiful history, yet they get more visibility and representation than bisexuals?

am i supposed to act like if the roots of this toxic label are nonexistent?

am i supposed to not talk about how bisexuals are literally the ones that get forgotten more frequently, despite being the third letter of the acronym?

am i supposed to complain at battle axe bis just because they're "toxic" and "panphobes", when pannies don't even get oppressed?

am i supposed to not talk about how pansexuals didn't had to fight for their rights, therefore they're privileged, despite the history of their label?

[nao-me-odeio]

"stop gatekeeping"

i just LOVE how people justify using a transphobic and biphobic label saying that "it's none of your business" or "stop policing sexualities", or even "you don't get to decide what is valid and what is not", like BITCH AHAHAHA i do. i surely do.

so what? what if i say that p*dophiles don't belong to the community? will you say that "we are all valid uwu" shit to me?? people always says that gatekeeping is bad, so what? you're gonna accept p*dophiles, z**philes and n*crophiles at the community??? because "we are all valid"??? because "gatekeeping is bad"??? huh???

what if... i told you that pansexuality roots are JUST like that? that it was made to justify those disgusting stuff? what if?

wouldn't it be funny?