mobile suit gundam (1979) simoun (2006)
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Mongolia
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from Thailand
mobile suit gundam (1979) simoun (2006)
I have a pirated copy of Simoun, and in my filelist is an episode titled "Simoun Extras 8.2", which is a 3-minute cut filled with a bunch of jokes
I have no idea if this is official or not, but I think it might be because the Japanese captions are hard-baked into the video
Trigger warnings apply for anything that happens in the show proper (since some of the jokes here are in poor taste)
Simoun rewatch episodes 17-20
So, there are 4 primary points people tend to get into histrionics over when attempting to criticize the show: 1) Dominura and Rimone 2) Kaimu and Alti 3) Paraietta sexually assaulting Neviril 4) The fact that Kyoukoku is a patriarchy
Simoun (2006-2007)
Sometimes, i wish there’s more fanfiction of this anime
Can you imagine my absolute heartbreak upon learning through putting together this supercut that it only happened a grand total of 4 times in the entire show? THE MEMES THEY ARE A LIE
Simoun episodes 18 and 19 spoilers (negative)
"If you traumatized someone you care about, you should stay away from them" is not a bad lesson; it's objectively correct. But, who needs to hear that? In general, people who actually care about someone will not do to them what Alti or Paraietta did in the first place. Conversely, people who did what they did are not going to suddenly decide to do the right thing and stay away from their victims just because an anime told them to.
Idk, something feels wrong about a main character being assaulted onscreen just to further the perpetrator's story arc.
The most charitable interpretation I can give of the purpose of the scene and the followup to it, is that it's meant as a criticism of the "rape is love" trope that you see in some shoujo/josei, where a love interest will sexually assault a protagonist because he's just so attracted to her that he lost control, and gets to maintain his close relationship with her afterward without any real consequences. I, don't watch a lot of anime like this, but Rose of Versailles is an example, all the more noteworthy because it's often praised as a feminist work (and in many ways it is an important feminist work, but this aspect of it is not criticized as often as it should be).
The criticism Simoun would be making would be something along the lines of "Well even if a character really did sexually assault someone they actually love because they couldn't control themselves, that's not an excuse, if they really feel bad about what they've done they should stay away from their victim until such a time as their victim decides they want to resume the friendship, if that ever happens." Which is certainly correct, but I'm not convinced that that premise should be entertained in the first place because it overlooks the fact that in general, sexual assault is not about attraction; it is about power.
In any case I'm not even sure if that's what the writers were going for. That's just the most charitable explanation I can think of for why they would have chosen to include that scene, not necessarily the most likely one.
All of this still isn't as bad as what the writers did in episode 12. At least in this case, only the perpetrator is held responsible. The main character responding to "My sister came onto me when I was too vulnerable to say no" with "Well I wasn't there so there's no way for me to know who really started it or who was at fault" and never realizing that this is wrong is definitely the worst thing in this anime, hands down.
Simoun (2006-2007)