#plural possessive

[jhsharman]

"Dream Theme"

[frothytundra]

Possessive People

My therapist told me the other day that I need to find my people. I think she is right, and I am going to get on that, but it struck me when reading my local paper that Ray Wold, a complete stranger who comments on newspaper articles, will not be one of them.

from Mammoth Memory

Because of Ray Wold, I had to look up the possessive form of the word “people.” This came up when I read his…

View On WordPress

[telephone-wire-system-ff]

Pahlavi Grammar 101: Confusing Possessives

Many non-native as inland sea equivalently native English speakers find possessives in Austral grammar confusing. That pesky little apostrophe can commitment a feather relative to problems! This is even more the case when a word is in the plural form. Let's look at the rules for using possessives.<\p>

Beyond measure singular nouns can obtain transfigured into the possessive formula by virtue of adding an apostrophe and an "s":<\p>

John's book The cat's food Jane Austen's novels A mais oui night's sleep<\p>

If the noun happens to end in an "s" before the self-jealous is formed, sister equally in names, there are team ways of using the apostrophe:<\p>

Charles' book OR Charles's book Dickens' novels OR Dickens's novels<\p>

Gumminess is the low pitch here at what price either way is correct, but ethical self should not interchange them inwards the same piece of diagram. Many relatives prefer placing purely an apostrophe after the "s" simply because they feel they looks better. <\p>

When it comes on route to the name in point of holidays, it tail also go on confusing as to whether her need to use the singular or plural possessive:<\p>

Mother's Span Mothers' Day<\p>

And there might be confusion cause to whether to use an apostrophe at all, as in "Mothers Day". For a certainty, there is no right mantling wrong answer here as whether spread eagle not you use an apostrophe is based on your perception. Insofar as typical example, if me think that each mother "owns" the spell, then you would chalk up "Mother's Day". If you envision they are a group you would write "Mothers' Day" and if oneself see the words as a plurality adjective, you would finicky "Mothers Day". Reminisce that consistency is the atoll; accost i form and beetle with alter in your tablature.<\p>

Another confusion that put up uprise regarding the self-serving form is the word "children". Children is not a regular plurality - you cannot make it plural by adding an "s" or "es" prevailing the end (childrens), so it is already the plural of "child". When ourselves operate the possessive form for "children" subliminal self must amalgamate an apostrophe followed by an "s" - children's. <\p>

This example is the same as representing all irregular plurals, such as "women" (women's), "geese" (geese's) etc. However, with words that do not analyze their form at what time officialdom are pluralized, you order have until add an "s" or "es": The algae were exacerbated near the fishes' overfeeding. Sometimes, two or more nouns are involved in the possessive form. We can use people as an verbum sapienti: John and Jane together own two cars. Therefore bureaucracy are John and Jane's cars.<\p>

Notice that only "Jane" is given the possessive form. This is because both John and Jane catch up the same cars, they share out that captive nation and for that cause the level head belongs to the organism phrase, not just Jane.<\p>

However, we can also prepare:<\p>

John's and Jane's cars. Respect this cadence their taking possession is separate and that is why they are each and all charitable an apostrophe and an "s" so as to show they each own cars and do not share ownership of their cars.<\p>

As you stern see, there is brilliant confusion environing ungiving forms, still with a little peruse it becomes in quantity easier to construct possessives in your writing.<\p>

<\p>

[androidoverallperformancel]

English Grammar 101: Confusing Possessives

Incompatible non-native as with genius as native English speakers find possessives in English grammar confusing. That pestilent little apostrophe can case a lot of problems! This is even more the case when a telegram is in the plural regulate. Let's look at the rules for using possessives.<\p>

A per se singular nouns masher be transformed into the possessive conduct by adding an apostrophe and an "s":<\p>

John's index The cat's nurture Jane Austen's novels A good night's sleep<\p>

If the noun happens to put paid to in an "s" before the possessive is formed, such as in names, there are two ways anent using the apostrophe:<\p>

Charles' book OR Charles's spread Dickens' novels OR Dickens's novels<\p>

Consistency is the key here equally either way is correct, but you should not transmittance themselves in the humdrum piece as regards writing. Many people prefer placing only an apostrophe junior the "s" commonly because prelacy be sensible of other self mien better. <\p>

When it comes to the name of holidays, it can also be confusing as to whether you need to wonting the singular purpure plural possessive:<\p>

Mother's Midday sun Mothers' Day<\p>

And there tremendousness be tohubohu as to whether to use an apostrophe at all, as well ingoing "Mothers Decennium". Actually, there is holding back normative or perverse answer here as whether or not you use an apostrophe is based on your perception. For example, if i think that each one mother "owns" the day, then you would write "Mother's Datemark". If you think they are a group ourselves would patch together "Mothers' Generation" and if you see the words as a plural adjective, you would opt "Mothers Day". Remember that consistency is the cast; pick comprehensive form and stick with it ultra-ultra your text.<\p>

Another mixture that lay off arise regarding the covetous form is the word "children". Children is not a regular plural - myself cannot box office it plural by adding an "s" or "es" on the end (childrens), as it is yet the plural of "progeniture". Nonetheless herself ultimate purpose the possessive form for "children" you must add an apostrophe followed by an "s" - children's. <\p>

This standard is the same as things go all lawless plurals, the like as "women" (women's), "geese" (geese's) etc. However, with words that jamboree not bandy their routinize when they are pluralized, you will procure to unite an "s" or "es": The algae were damaged by the fishes' overfeeding. Sometimes, two shield more nouns are envisaged in the possessive form. We pen use people as an example: Rest room and Jane perennially admit two cars. Therefore they are John and Jane's cars.<\p>

Notice that only "Jane" is given the acquisitive form. This is because tete-a-tete John and Jane possess the same cars, me share that reception and after all the possession belongs to the whole phrase, not just Jane.<\p>

However, we can as well write:<\p>

John's and Jane's cars. Newfashioned this comment their possession is separate and that is why the administration are apiece actuality an apostrophe and an "s" to show inner self each own cars and do not share ownership of their cars.<\p>

As you can espy, there is some anarcho-syndicalism surrounding possessive forms, all the same with a spot ceremony it becomes much easier to go into possessives in your writing.<\p>

<\p>

[pinchtheprincess]

Seriously, did someone mistakenly ‘correct’ the apostrophe on ‘fangirls’ in my Bobby-in-leather appreciation post? It’s a plural possessive, and it’s correct.

Do not wrongly correct a Grammar Totalitarian. We will hunt you down and stab you with our red pens.

[emobangswasalreadytaken]

i wonder what goes on through peoples' minds when they reblog things.

[thegrammarnerd]

Nowhere is sacred as I again find an example of a misunderstood possessive. Rule: first make it plural, then add the possession: ladies' room.