I'm gonna PEE all over this fic

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Netherlands

seen from Poland

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from Taiwan

seen from United States
I'm gonna PEE all over this fic
Remember to PEE all over your posts!
PEE stands for Point, Evidence, Explain. It's a useful way to structure your arguments.
Point: Make a statement.
Evidence: Give examples to back up your statement.
Explain: Tell us why the examples support your statement.
Here's an example of how you might apply the PEE formula. I'll use Hazbin Hotel because that's my current special interest.
Point: "Huskerdust will become canon."
Evidence: "Near the end of Episode 7, Angel Dust puts his arm around Husk, and Husk's pupils are noticeably more dilated when he looks at Angel than when he looks down at Charlie and Vaggie."
Explain: "Husk is a cat demon, and cats' pupils dilate when they see something that excites them. Husk is clearly excited to see Angel. And I think that moment was dropping a hint that Husk and Angel's feelings will develop into romance later down the line."
Now, you may believe there are flaws in this argument. You may think that there's not enough evidence to support the point, or that I haven't explained myself well. But because I've laid everything out, you can see the reasoning and make your own judgement about whether you want to agree with what I say.
I'm highlighting the importance of PEEing because all too often I see people online making statements like, "This is fetishising abuse!" or, "This is infantilising gay men!" or, "This content creator is a proshipper!" while neither explaining what they mean by terms such as "fetishisation," "infantilisation" or "proshipper" (terms which not everyone will understand straightaway) nor giving evidence to support their statements.
And, inevitably, some people will take what they read on the Internet at face value and not research the matter any further, instead just passing those points along and whipping people up into a fury.
It doesn't have to be like this. A little more PEEing can make a big difference.
If you've got evidence for your point, show it. And always explain how the evidence proves the point - even if you think it's obvious, because it won't be obvious to everyone. Give us all the facts we need to make our own minds up about the validity of your claim.
If you want to read more about how to PEE, you can check out these articles from the University of West London and BBC Bitesize.
Now go forth and PEE everywhere!
a take on wilford's power
Yep, I’m joining the bandwagon theory train.
From the entire Markiplier TV video, I have a take on Wilford’s ability. How he can trap people within TVs. Think of how Mark referred him as “much like Warfstache, doesn’t obey the laws of physics” (from the “Mark on Darkiplier” video, 7:12). If that is the case, Warf is very similiar to Dark in the sense of being in a “shell of a human”. This isn’t about Dark, but they are both the same kind of entity that are reality defying.
Now, furthering into “reality defying” in Warf’s case, Warf, throughout Markiplier TV video, has gotten Teamiplier to be apart of this whole pilot episode to bring up in the ego meeting.
Or, have “trapped” them within this TV versed, low quality in visualized, reality in Television for Warf and Dark to control. I would not discredit the Host to be a part of this reality manipulation as well to keep them trapped in TV world.
I mean, the last Mark Bop segment literally mumbled “help me” to us as the viewer. To get him and everyone out of the TV world.
So yeah, I just wanted to point out, or bring this aspect of Wilf’s power. Ability, I mean, I really didn’t go down more specifically but I just Point Evidence Explained a part of him, as a reality bending being.
Actual conversation in my history class
Student: so are we doing one big pee or a lot of small ones
Teacher: a lot of small pees
Student: that just seems very messy
Teacher: a lot of small pee's? Yes that is quite a mess