Anthony Bourdain preparing a meal in the kitchen of his New York apartment in 1997.
Photographer: Jack Manning/The New York Times
#ryland grace#phm#rocky the eridian#project hail mary spoilers



seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Israel

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Israel

seen from Singapore
seen from China

seen from Singapore
seen from Israel
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Macao SAR China
seen from Saudi Arabia
Anthony Bourdain preparing a meal in the kitchen of his New York apartment in 1997.
Photographer: Jack Manning/The New York Times
The defendants in the case previously argued that requiring insurance coverage of PrEP access was similar to supporting homosexuality.
"The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday [June 27, 2025] upheld a key provision of the Affordable Care Act, ruling in Kennedy v. Braidwood that health insurance companies must continue covering preventive services recommended by a federal task force — including HIV prevention medication, cancer screenings, and vaccines.
The Court ruled 6-3, in an opinion written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, concluding that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force operates constitutionally and that the Secretary of Health and Human Services has the authority to appoint its members as inferior officers. That means the ACA’s mandate, requiring insurers to cover preventive services, remains intact. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neal Gorsuch dissented.
The majority rejected arguments that the Task Force’s structure violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, emphasizing that Congress had provided for the Secretary’s oversight and removal authority, making the Task Force’s members “inferior officers.”
At issue was whether insurers could be compelled to cover services such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, which prevents HIV transmission. Public health experts say PrEP access is especially vital for Black and Latine gay and bisexual men and transgender women, who are disproportionately impacted by HIV.
Other services potentially on the chopping block included screenings for cancer, depression, hepatitis B and C, and sexually transmitted infections, as well as a range of vaccines and counseling interventions.
The plaintiffs, a group of Christian business owners, argued that being required to cover PrEP violated their religious beliefs, claiming the medication “encourages homosexual behavior.” A lower court had previously sided with them, sparking concern that the ruling could jeopardize nationwide access to dozens of preventive health services.
Medical experts and LGBTQ+ advocates emphasized that PrEP is used by people of all backgrounds and sexual orientations, and that HIV “does not discriminate.”
Friday’s decision, on the last day of the Supreme Court's term, marks a significant win for LGBTQ+ health equity and for public health more broadly, following years of legal attempts to undermine the ACA’s nondiscrimination and preventive care mandates.
A joint statement by Lambda Legal, PrEP4All, the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, the Center for HIV Law and Policy, and Equality Federation called the ruling “the right decision to reject this assault,” saying it “uphold[s] essential protections for preventive services and affirm[s] that prevention and early detection of diseases save lives, improve health outcomes, and reduce long-term health outcomes.”
They said the Braidwood case “has been not just an attack on HIV prevention or LGBTQ people — it has been a coordinated effort to dismantle access to no-cost preventive healthcare for more than 150 million Americans.”
“This was never about religious liberty,” the statement continued. “It has been about using LGBTQ people as a scapegoat to push a broader agenda that punishes the vulnerable. And the truth is, most of the people harmed by this decision wouldn’t have been queer. They would be working-class families, Black and Brown communities, rural Americans, and anyone who relies on preventive care to stay healthy and alive.”
The groups warned that while the ruling preserves existing protections, vigilance is needed to prevent political interference. “History reminds us that silence is deadly,” they said, invoking the memory of the AIDS crisis and those who “weaponized faith to justify inaction.” ...
“This Pride Month, we celebrate this victory as we honor the legacy of those who fought back at Stonewall, who took to the streets with ACT UP, and who demanded dignity at the height of crisis,” the statement said. “We carry that legacy forward now. Join us. Raise your voice. Defend preventive care. Fight back.”"
-via The Advocate, June 27, 2025
Matt Damon, Jude Law, & Gwyneth Paltrow (1999)
Good News! 6-month PrEP (Hiv Prevention) EXISTS.
Yeztugo Lenacapavir Is Now the First and Only FDA Approved HIV Prevention Option Offering 6 Months of Protection
So, the above is an official press release, but it links to third party sources. WE ARE SEEING THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF HIV.
There's still a long fight to go, but TLDR, 6-month pre-exposure prophylaxis, a twice-yearly shot to prevent receiving an HIV infection? Is INCREDIBLE. Add this to the 9-count of folks who we have successfully CURED of HIV, and indeed, we can see the trajectory of the disease hopefully leading truly towards its own demise. If you're someone who regularly engages in hookups / is among higher risk populations, and you have the resources for this? Keep an eye out. Similarly, I'm pretty confident from the way this press-release is worded that a generic will be on the way sooner than you think. Even if this only starts circulating amongst clients with money, reducing circulation of HIV generally is still vital and beneficial.
HUGH MORRIS - TOMODACHI LIFE: LIVING THE DREAM
What cliche is Hugh Morris?
Nerd
Goth
Prep
Jock
Some Freaky Combination