The White supremacist answer would be "They're naturally criminal"! NOPE! That picture is a CRIME!

seen from United States

seen from Puerto Rico
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from China
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Bolivia
seen from United States
The White supremacist answer would be "They're naturally criminal"! NOPE! That picture is a CRIME!
The Prison Industrial Complex
Mihael Ruja
Alan Ruiz
Architecture without the Architect
The Prison Industrial Complex
The prison industrial complex is a rhizome of capitalist ideologies and their sources of power. The term ‘rhizome’ fitting for examining the relational space that is created through the different points of power and effect. The industrial complex so adheres to our society that a society without it seems inconceivable. In reference to this, a rhizome is inescapable from its convoluted nodes of power-points of formation. These nodes, in turn, are apart of a rhizome, a system, a from. This form is best visualized as the rhizome by Deleuze and Guattari, which exemplifies the dimensional complexity of relational space created by an enforced capitalistic ideology. In exploring this node and their segments, we come across important aspects such as the architecture of the industrial complex, societal ideologies, and the relationship between sources of power which enforce these ideologies.
The architecture of the prison industrial complex reflects the function of the theory of a prison and the powers that own it. The function of the prison is to correct and punish the prisoner. The prisoner is viewed as a danger in the eyes of citizens and thus must be corrected of their dangerous nature. With this in mind, the architecture of the prison must then cure the prisoner of their dangerous nature. In order to do so, the architecture of the prison must assume a binary and decide what is right and wrong-which is contingent to the powers that erect these prisons. As a result, the architecture of the prison creates a subject that is both denied of individuality through the scope of capitalism but is accepted in the eyes of the society that surrounds it. An example of this is the Panopticon which tries to enforce a perfect subject that is controlled by their own visibility of authority-which is to say that the subject is self-inflicting “a state of conscious and permanent visibility.” As described by Angela Davis this allows the prison to be controlled by corporations such as the pharmaceutical companies that test products or manufacturers that utilize the cheap labor cost of prisons. This reveals the relational aspect of the prison space, the relationship to power (who owns it) and the way it controlled the ideology of societies which in turn allows the erection of prisons.
The idea of visibility is also infinitely connected to power and control and Foucault expresses. The fact that we cannot conceive of a society without prisons is a form of visibility or lack thereof. If a power can control the ability to even imagine a different space then that society is forever held within the scope of visibility that is presented. So what is the state a body must take within our society? What separates the sheep from the harder? And how does one escape this indissoluble system?
The U.S. Department of Labor values its strong partnerships with industry/employers. You put Americans to work, and your innovations drive the success of regional economies and assure our continued economic competitiveness on a global scale.
More information on the WOTC that includes for-profit prison labor. But should it?
The death count is rising.
Some say coincidence. I say disturbing pattern