Jordan Peterson Tries to Speak About Purpose, Fails
The problem with a hierarchy is it produces inequality. The problem with inequality is it produces resentment. Right, but you can’t get rid of the damn hierarchy just because they produce inequality and resentment, because then you don’t have anywhere to go. So that’s not an answer.
Okay, so let’s say you’re trying to deal with the fact that you have to put up with a hierarchy if you’re going to have any values. Well, how do you escape from the resentment trap? And the answer is you do an intelligent multidimensional analysis of your life.
It’s like, by the time you’re 30, I would say, you’re a pretty singular person. You’re unique and particular and your life has multiple dimensions. And you’re more or less successful—or not—along many of those dimensions.
But it’s a completely ridiculous game to pick someone else arbitrarily, who’s doing much better than you on one of those dimensions, to assume that you’re a failure because of that, or that the world is unfair because of that, without knowing in full detail all of the rest of the elements of their lives. I mean, look, we’re absolutely awash in stories of unhappy celebrities mired in interminable divorces or in affairs or in addictions. And that’s par for the course.
It’s not helpful. It’s helpful to have a goal. It’s necessary to have a hierarchy. It’s not particularly useful to compare yourself to other people. But it is useful to compare yourself to yourself. That’s the right baseline, right? That takes everything else into account.
Unexamined assumptions in Jordan’s argument (just in the section I’ve quoted): (1) Without hierarchy, we’d have nowhere to go; (2) Having nowhere to go is not an answer; (3) Without hierarchy, we’d have no values; (4) Responding to injustice and inequality through struggle against hierarchy is resentment; (5) Expressing resentment is a trap; (6) By the time you’re 30, you’re a singular person; (7) We become unique and particular when we embrace hierarchy, injustice, and inequality; (8) Comparing our social situations to others’ situations is arbitrary; (9) Struggling against hierarchy is a form of unhappiness comparable to celebrities mired in divorces or affairs or addictions and that is par for the course; (10) Without hierarchy, one cannot have goals; (11) Comparing ourselves to others is unhelpful; (12) Comparing “yourself to yourself” is an activity that takes “everything else” into account.
Peterson’s pseudo-intellectual spiel is as convoluted as these self-help men get. I don’t really understand how he’s become to be so well regarded. He makes zero sense when he talks. I don’t think he’s capable of having written his own books. I imagine with some close analysis, we’d be discover his written work is mostly paraphrased bits from other shit he’s read.