Hello, as a person interested in history, I want to know your opinion: Sometime around the 1890s to 1920s, a mummy (a real human whose body was dried and preserved) was donated(?) to my school and has remained there since, probably used to study anatomy. Recently, the school admitted that she (the mummy has female organs) exists in the attic. A university is doing forensics research on her. But my school wants the students to name her and is treating her as a spectacle to "take selfies with"
my field of expertise is more concerned engaging with written material and I am no specialist when it comes to human remains, but I think this is an ethical question I'll try to answer from my personal point of view.
You hit the nail on the head by calling what is going on "using her as a spectacle", and I am baffled there are people out there who think it is appropriate and even encourage minors to take pictures with human remains. I am of the opinion that the human remains known as the 'mummy' (putting parentheses here because I am not sure if these remains do infact qualify as a mummy) should be buried, not used as a photo prop.
Human remains ought to be treated in the same way you would (and in turn, would like to be treated by) the living, namely with respect. This includes not taking pictures with them, obviously.
I think what your school is aiming at is fundamentally well-intentioned, trying to include the student body in the project surrounding the 'mummy' and starting a conversation about the research, but has absolutely not thought things through.
Some points to consider in connection with the 'mummy' are:
the question of provenance. Does the school know how the remains were acquired, and if the person whose body is being poshumously exhibited has given their consent to be turned into a teaching object? If the answer is "no, they did not give their consent" or "we do not know", there should be no question about burying the remains.
What purpose do the remains serve? Are they genuinely required to teach human anatomy? They are not. Books, diagrams, models and interactive, computer-based programmes are a lot more useful teaching human anatomy than preserved remains.
Ethical considerations: This once was a person; someone's child, sibling, partner or parent. Therefore, the 'mummy' deserves to be treated with respect. Before taking a picture with these remains, people should ask themselves if they would be comfortable if their body or that of a loved one would be used as a photo prop after their death.
If the remains do not have any purpose that necessitates them being kept, why are they being kept at all?
The only thing I am not appalled by is the idea of naming the 'mummy'. In fact, I think this may be a way of reminding the students of the fact that these remains belong to a very real human being, and creates a sense of community and rememberance surrounding them- this person's remains may have been stored in a school attic without context for the past century or so, but now, by giving them a name, a sense of personhood and dignity is being restored to them. I will add the caveat here that knowing what human beings can be like sometimes, you'd of course have to monitor submissions; some incredibly original jokester will inevitably propose something inappropriate along the lines of "Mummy McMummyface".
In addition to this, a name might be nice to have particularly if the remains should (and hopefully will be at some point) be buried. Instead of having no grave marker or indeed one saying "unknown person whose remains were used for teaching anatomy at X School", which makes it sound as if this person's entire identity and existence on earth revolved around having had their preserved body stared at by students, a name, again, stresses the fact the interred remains were once a person.
As for student participation, why not invite the scientists conducting the forensic testing to to do some (virtual (?), given Covid is still among us) talks about their work and findings? Scientists and scholars of all fields love being asked about their work. Additionally, this would provide a wonderful opportunity for students to catch a glimpse of how scientists work.
Another form of student participation in case the school should decide to bury the remains could be that students who want to get involved could help raise money for a grave marker, flowers or help plan an interment ceremony. I would like to make the addition here that depending what the forensic testing and possibly any additional historical research might reveal about the person's ethnicity and/or religion, representatives of these groups should be approached and asked if they would like to partake in or, if this is their wish, take over burying the remains.
I don't know in how far your school has any student representation to whom you could turn, or if you would at all be comfortable openly questioning how the 'mummy' is being treated, but if you are so inclined, I would advise finding like-minded fellow students (the more, the better) and perhaps asking your parents or guardians to talk to the school. While students are more likely to be brushed off, parents informing the administrators they are appalled at the idea that the school encourages minors to take selfies with human remains might be more effective, at least in putting a stop to the 'mummy' being used as a prop in students' selfies.
I sincerely thank you for the confidence I find expressed in you asking my opinion; if there are any developments, I would like to know, provided of course you are comfortable sharing them.
P.S.: I'll tag @world-of-mummies, which is a blog run by an archeologist specialised in human remains, practices surrounding death and burial and indeed, mummies! As a specialist in the field, I would be glad for a second opinion from you, if you would like to give one- please correct me if necessary and feel free to add any additional points I may not have touched upon.