obsessed with the Achilles and Patroclus parallels
Will and mike (let's just ignore vol2)
Ragnar and Athelstan
Will and Hannibal
Ilya and Shane
Arthur and Merlin
lestat and louis
It's all very Ethel Cainy
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from China
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from Uruguay
seen from Japan
seen from China
seen from China
seen from France
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from China
seen from Japan
seen from Germany
obsessed with the Achilles and Patroclus parallels
Will and mike (let's just ignore vol2)
Ragnar and Athelstan
Will and Hannibal
Ilya and Shane
Arthur and Merlin
lestat and louis
It's all very Ethel Cainy
Just thinking about these two again
Ragnar and Athelstan
A bond deeper than that of brothers, friends or lovers.
The way i see it they aren't romantic or strictly platonic, I don't think these labels help understand a relationship this complex. while saying this. Yes they are completely in love with one another, Ragnar loved him more than he loved anyone.
They have this bond that transcends their peoples cultures and conflicts. They are each other's teachers. and unlike every other relationship in this show, they never betray one another. Despite how easily they could have
Despite their relationship being seen as a negative thing in both of their worlds.
Athelstan's death is both the consequence of his devotion to Ragnar and the inevitable outcome of growing prejudice and animosity between the cultures and faiths he was torn between. It's a death that Ragnar never recovers from, ultimately destroying his dreams of peace and coexistence between their peoples.
fav relationships--
jax and tara from sons of anarchy (tragic romantic love) they break my heart. "what happened to me?"
claudia and louis - interview with a vampire. (paternal love) "claudia was....everything" should get more appreciation
jinx and silco - arcane. (paternal love) he was the worst thing that ever happened to her, and she was the best thing that ever happened to him. "don't cry....you're perfect"
Clara and the Doctor. doctor who (ambiguous love) may i say, they are my favs. "do you think i care for you so little that betraying me would make a difference"
jinx and vi. (sisterly love) the emotional heart of the story (arcane) "i thought....that maybe you could love me like you used to"
Ragnar and athelstan - vikings. (ambiguous love) "i hate you for leaving me" *cries*
arthur and merlin - merlin (ambiguous love *come on its romantic*) the og queerbate "thank you...."
hannibal and will - hannibal. (toxic "love") "I let you know me... see me. I gave you a rare gift, but you didn't want it"
Cesare and Lucrezia - the borgias - it's gonna sound weird to anyone who hasn't watched the show - "Impossible loves. I am very much afraid they can become an addiction.”
Why didn't Ragnar say anything about king ecberts betrayal?
And why did he kill that farmer?
Bjorn explains it by saying that Ragnar's people would have killed him for his mistake.
Which I'm not sure is necessarily true. As his people rose up, invading England, and killing the kings responsible for his death.
They didn't form a mob to kill him when he returned either
"He was not just their king, he was the most famous man in their world"
I mean The mistake was pretty grievous, he led warriors to their deaths paying the price of obtaining land for farming, which was destroyed as soon as they left. Which means that this war they waged for king ecbert was for nothing.
I mean, if a politician did this, he'd be fucked. Because he's failed the people he's meant to represent. And we can easily get rid of them. Kings can be killed, usurped but can't really be forced to abdicate
And in any case Kings lead armies into wars, and lose wars all the time. It wouldn't make them popular, they'd lose support but unless things were dire already, There wouldn't be some kind of mutiny. Especially as we've seen how Ragnar has dealt with powerful enemies.
What it would have done is exasperated hatred towards the saxons, and above all Christianity, resulting in the death of both Athelstan, and the progress and change for his people, which Ragnar had always believed in.
People would doubt his leadership, but they would be more likely, as Floki did, to blame it on an "evil adviser".
Ragnar kills the farmer to prevent the information from getting out. But that information only would have obligated him to seek revenge, that would be it.
So why does he kill him. After floki blames Athelstan for what had happend, Ragnar looks at floki with rising horror "what about Athelstan" and emotionally defends him
To me this signals that he knew what would happen to him if it got out. And straight away kills the farmer. i doubt he was planning to do so before.
So now he is also responsible for covering up this atrocity, and murdering the surviving witness. Which is part of the reason why his people reject him when he returns.
So ultimately I think he killed the farmer because of Athelstan, and once hed done what hed done to protect him, he was in too deep and couldn't tell anybody.
Is it casualll now
Vikings - athelstan and ragnar/ king ecbert
Doctor who - clara and the doctor
Merlin - merlin and Arthur
Stranger things - mike and will
Dare me - beth and addy
medici - lorenzo and francesco
rhaenyra and allicent
jackie and shauna
Will and Hannibal
Do you ever think about Athelnar and just
Athelstan: *Exists*
Ragnar: