Mar 4, 2023
Deepika Padukone, Padmaavat, 2018.
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from Malaysia
seen from Sweden
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Sweden
seen from Türkiye
seen from T1
seen from Russia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Slovakia
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Greece
seen from Russia
Deepika Padukone, Padmaavat, 2018.
Deepika Padukone in Padmavati (2017) as Rani Padmavati
Actresses portraying queens, 1955. 1. Vyjayanthimala as Padmini 2. S. Varalakshmi as Rudramma Devi 3. MN Rajam as Virama Devi, a Chola queen and 4. Ragini as Mumtaz Mahal.
More here.
FAMMMMM!!! You know when you see this you are in for the time of your life. Like there’s no other form of artistic expression than Sanjay Leela Bhansali. I watched Padmaavat(i) tonight for the first time. Can I just say I was absolutely blown away. The cinematic experience was unreal and this is without the 3-D, might I add. When I say cinematic experience, I’m not talking about the backgrounds and scenery because it’s 2018, mastery of this stuff is expected after we’ve been through Ram-Leela and Bajirao-Mastani; I’m talking about our lead actors Mr. Kapoor and Mr. Singh … um … Shahid finally hit puberty and once again, if you know me I stand by this, Ranveer is the most versatile actor on the screen right now. With respect to our lead actress, Ms. Padukone is outstanding in bringing to life, once again, figures of significance. Being extraordinary and portraying extraordinary women are what some of us are born to do, no hate here. Amazing amazing amazing. There is one objection I had though but I do need to clarify and check my sources before I post and look like a dummy
Rani Padmini, the Goddess Queen
“The Rajput women are as much a warrior as the Rajput men.”