Linda McCartney - My Love 1978
What technology was used to make the images? How does this affect your reading of the work? The technology used would’ve been an old camera,not a high-tech DSLR. This affects my reading in that I wouldn’t see it as a planned shoot where she wanted perfection, but rather a spur of the moment image.
Describe what you can see and where is it within the image? I can see a London street at sunset or late evening in a car with the front mirror reflection of Paul McCartney.
What is the format of the image - is it portrait or landscape? What does this imply? The image is a landscape which implies that the street street and buildings are meant to be there as a backdrop and that the scene isn’t solely focused on Paul.
Consider the composition - where are things placed within the images? Things are placed randomly as it’s taken in the moment, but there are tall buildings on the left and right hand-side to frame the images and the mirror image of Paul is to the right slightly follows the rules of thirds.
What is included within the frame and what is excluded? What effect does this have? What’s included is the scenery which gives it a warm intimate feel. What’s excluded is the car showing that Linda only wanted to use the mirror and that the focus wasn’t that they were in a car.
What is the photographer’s viewpoint - is it above, below or equal to the subject? What does this imply? How would the image change if the viewpoint was different? The photographers viewpoint is just below the subject implying that Linda looks up to Paul, holds him in high standards.
What happened before and after the photograph was taken? Unable to give answer.
What is the light source within the image? Is it natural and artificial? What atmosphere or mood does this create? The natural light source is coming from the sun which to me creates a real, intimate mood.
Is the image colour or black and white? How does this affect your reading of the image? How would the work differ if it were changed from colour to black and white or vice versa? The image is in colour allowing us to see exactly what Linda saw in that moment and it gives us an insight on her as a person. If this image were to be in Black and White it would create more of an artificial mood in that we feel .
What scale is the work? Is it small and intimate or large and dominating? The scale of the work is both small and intimate & large and dominating depending on the subject such as Paul being the smaller subject but the street of London being the larger.
How is the work presented? Is it framed, hung on wall, floor based? Why? What effect does this have? The work was hung on a wall, giving the effect that it was something to be displayed and shown off.
Is the work titled? How does the title affect the meaning of the image? What title would you give of the work? The work is titled “My Love”, which affects my interpretation of the image as not being melancholic which was my first impression before reading the title. I would’ve given the title, “Moments in-between”.
Who might the image have been made by? Why? Who for? It was made by Linda for her herself as a moment she wanted to keep.
What do you think the artist is trying to say? Do you think they have communicated their ideas successfully? I think the artist is trying to show all the moments in between she gets, even the small intimate ones that aren’t overly exciting or romantic, it’s the just being with someone that matters.
How does the work make you feel? It makes me feel a bit lonely and pensive.
Do you like or dislike the work? Why? I like the work because not only did it really stand out, I found it made me reflect a lot more about things than I would’ve thought from just one image.
Anything further notes or musings…