For someone who claims to care about "the facts" so much, you sure do love to write really long posts with not a single cited source.
I mean most of my posts are like. Wikipedia level research. I'm not spreading some obscure new revelation or complex scientific concept, so as long as I keep it surface level, I don't usually add citations.
But if it helps, here's the works cited for the Magnus Hirschfeld response: - Your original source, an archived version of a 1994 CD-Rom about the Institut für Sexualwissenschaften. I've also referred to the german version. - Wikipedia entries (in order of my browsing history) for Dora Richter, Lili Elbe, Kurt Warnekros, Organ Transplantation, Transplant Rejection, Xenotransplantation, Eugen Steinach, Serge Voronoff, Monique Wittig, Magnus Hirschfeld, and Transvestite Passes. I make a habit out of checking both the english and german version of articles, especially when it comes to german related topics. Aside from Monique Wittig, I've referred to both versions on all mentioned articles. - Lili Elbe's biography on the Magnus Hirschfeld foundation's website - My cat's vomit (no link for that one, sorry)
Non-cited works include the Wikipedia entry for Simone de Beauvoir (too much of a tangent, Wittig sufficed) and body snatching (not relevant, out of fashion by the 20th century and most likely not the origin of any donated gonads)
It is kind of a wild response to a post where I a) link a source and b) had to sift through the notes to find your non-attributed and incorrectly cited source in the first place.
Do feel free to provide any sources for your animal testicle xenotransplant conversion therapy claims or verification that Lili Elbe received a transplanted uterus of a dead woman. Considering the amount of documentation from the time lost to Nazi burnings and World War bombings, historians would certainly be grateful for any clarity.
