#ruthenian

[furordinaricvs]

Ruthenian/Rusyn religious procession, village of Šumiac, Czechoslovakia 1955.

[allethnicities]

Ethnonyms: Rusyns, Carpatho-Rusyns, Ruthenians, Lemko, Rusnaks

Total population: 1,097,850

Ethnolinguistic classification: Indo-European → Balto-Slavic → Slavic → East Slavic

Homeland: Transcarpathia

Regions with significant populations: Ukraine (Zakarpattia Oblast), the Slovak Republic (the Prešov Region, the Košice Region), the Republic of Poland (Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Podkarpackie Voivodeship), the Republic of Serbia (the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina), Hungary (Budapest, Pest County, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Heves county, Nógrád County), the Republic of Croatia, the Czech Republic, Romania

Languages and dialects: Rusyn, Prešov, Lemko, Subcarpathian, Pannonian Rusyn

Religion: the Eastern Catholic Churches, the Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church

Related ethnic groups: Ukrainians, Belarusians, East Slavs

Rusyns are an East Slavic people whose name, identity, and classification have been historically fluid: the ethnonym comes from Rus (Ruthenia), and in older sources “Rusyn” and “Ruthenian” could refer more broadly to Slavic Christians in the medieval and early modern lands of Kievan Rus’, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, while in modern usage it most often denotes the Carpatho-Rusyn population of the Carpathian arc. They are also known by regional or older labels such as Carpatho-Rusyn, Lemko, Rusnak, and Ruthenian, and their historical homeland—often called Carpathian Rus’ or Carpathian Ruthenia—spans the borderlands of today’s Ukraine, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, Romania, and Serbia, with important diaspora communities in North America that formed through large-scale emigration from Austria-Hungary before World War I. Linguistically, Rusyn refers not only to the people but also to an East Slavic language tradition and a 20th-century codified literary standard, which sits close to Ukrainian in the East Slavic continuum but is also treated by many speakers and scholars as a distinct language with regional varieties. Culturally and religiously, Rusyn identity developed in a mountain borderland shaped by shifting empires, local village life, and a strong Eastern Christian heritage; the community has long been associated with both Orthodox and Greek Catholic traditions, and the Union of Uzhhorod in 1646 became a major turning point in the religious history of many Carpatho-Rusyn communities by drawing them into communion with Rome while preserving the Byzantine rite. Their history is marked by repeated reclassification by states, alternating periods of recognition and suppression, and enduring debate over whether Rusyns should be regarded as a separate nationality or as a subgroup of Ukrainians—an argument that remains especially contentious in Ukraine, even though the term and tradition continue to survive in family memory, local culture, liturgy, and language across the wider Carpathian world.

[diemelusine]

Kamianets-Podilskyi Castle, Ukraine. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ggolob

[sonyaheaneyauthor]

Old Austrian photochrom postcard of a couple from western Ukraine.

[yakasha]

Jewish and Ruthenian musicians in Verecke, Ukraine (then Hungary, Bereg county), 1895

[evilelitest2]

Ukraine Russia ConflictPart three, the Kievan Rus

Ok so where did this conflict start?  To understand that, we need to go back to the 9th century, where records are short, legends are long, and nationalists search the seas for mythological times to pine back too.  Welcome to Kievan Rus, aka Ruthenian, aka Svitjod the Great, aka Svitjod the Cold, aka “The place where Russian and Ukraine both trace their origins to this point. 

If anything, this map makes things too clean

 But before we talk about the Rus, we need to talk about “Periodization”.  Periodization is one of the most important concepts about being a historian, it's the dividing the past into distinct parts so it can be easier to understand. If you’ve ever studied Japanese History and are looking at the “Edo Period” or the ‘Showa Period” that's periodization, it's cutting up the past into distinct units.  Periodization is in many ways necessary to understand the past, you can’t study all of it or you will go mad, but it can create these divisions in time which don’t necessarily exist naturally.  A great example of this is the Early Modern Period, which historians use to highlight the development of the trends that will eventually emerge into the modern world.  The slow rise of capitalism, the slow death of feudalism (except in Russia), the downfall of the hegemony of the Catholic Church, the start of mass media, the first movements towards industrialization, the rise of the first global colonial empire and the creation of modern states.  It’s a very useful framework to understand the changes that happened in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries.  However, if you are a random Hanoverian peasant, as far as you know, there isn’t any difference between 1491 and 1492.  Time periods are useful but they aren’t ironclad things, like money, it's an illusion, just a functional and useful illusion.

nice and simple

The reason why that tangent mattered is that when it comes to what is called “National History”.  So you have a nation right, a whole new cool nation.  How do you make sure everybody is part of this nation?  Oh well you have public schools and in those public schools you have textbooks which teach the history of your country, how neat is that?  So..where do  you start?  History is long and it can be difficult to teach.  Like if the US finally got a national history curriculum, where would you start?  People have lived in the lands of the United states since at least 10,000 BCE, do we start there?  Do we start with the first European arrival in the colonies?   These aren’t neat or easy to answer questions, debates over “where do we start our history” can get really intense.   A lot of French history books will teach the Gauls to be like “look, these are our ancestors” but there is literally a thousand years separating the conquest of Gaul from the Emergence of France.  

Utterly uncomplicated in every way

Periodization matters for our purposes because both Ukraine and Russia point to the Kevian Rus as “the start of their civilization.” and while the events of the late 9th century shouldn’t be affecting us today, apparently it does.

 Another note is that the Kevian Rus is a bit hard to document due to the fact that the people didn’t have a writing system, so what we know comes from archaeological evidence and outside sources, so the make up and borders of this region is a bit hard to define with certainty but fuck it lets go. 

The Kievan Rus consisted of most of central and eastern Ukraine, Belarus, and the western chunk of Russia, and as the name implies it was based in Kiev, what is today the capital of Ukraine, though it wasn’t known as the Kievan Rus at the time, it was called the land of the Rus (due to the ruling Rurik dynasty) or just “Rus''. The earliest version of the word Russia refers to the eastern half of the Kievan Rus, while the western half (what is today Ukraine) was known as Ruthenia.   Since its origins are the stuff of legend, it might have been founded by Norse traders, or Norse people were invited to rule, or a bunch of Vikings settled peacefully in the area, it's a huge flame war among nationalists that isn’t relevant other than to show how much people still care about this area.  The Rus was a major trade network in the area and it was more of a loose confederation of city states rather than a strong centralized empire.  

Most relevant to our story is there relationship to the Byzantine Empire

Byzantium at its largest extent

  TANGENT TIME.  The Byzantine Empire was never called that during their time, they always thought of themselves as the Roman Empire.  When Constantine the Great converted the Empire to Christianity, he moved the capital to the new city of Constantinople (famously the modern city of Istanbul).  A century or so later, the empire split into East and West, with the East being seen as the greater and more powerful of the two.  The Western Roman Empire fell in 476 AD, the east just…kept on going until 1453.   No I’m not kidding, this matters for understanding Ukraine, those Zelensky memes were created in the legacy of Justinian the Great, keep watching.  As mentioned earlier, Western Empire goes Catholic, the Eastern goes Orthodox, and after the west falls, the Eastern Roman Empire keeps on going.  We call it the Byzantine Empire for…complicated reasons I might explore some day.  Anyways, by the time of the Kevian Rus, the Byzantines are the supreme cultural, military and most importantly economic power of Eastern Europe, and the Rus are basically massive fucking simps for them.  Like “please notice me Patriarch senpai '' simps.  They even played a major role in the Varangian Guard, the personal bodyguards of the Byzantine Emperor.  

The Rus were pagan at the time, a mix of the norse pantheon and the Slavic pantheon (pagan religion is complicated and deeply synthetic, I might talk about that in another post), but due to its location it always had Christian, Jewish and Muslim minorities, but it should come as no surprise that in 988 Volodymyr the I or Vladimir the Great converted the kingdom to Christianity, and due his taking a Byzantine bride and thus marrying into the Imperial family, it was of course Orthodox Christainity, thus starting over a thousand years of Orthodoxy in the region.  Anyways, eventually all good things came to an end and by the 12th century it suffered the weaknesses of feudal confederacy (succession crisis) and had largely broken apart in all but name, as local feudal lords sort of went their own way.  This is where the Russian/Ukrainian split first sort of not really occurs, the informal overall Rus still exist but you get these smaller Rus within it, the Novgorod Rus, the Moscow Rus, the Vladimir Rus.  But the distinction between the various Rus comes to matter less than you’d expect because suddenly…MONGOLS 

I really can’t empathize enough how big of a deal the Mongols were on the world stage, and probably one of the few legitimate examples of the Great Man theory of history proving true.  Temujin’s abandonment issues eventually result in an empire which destroys the Status Quo of the Eurasian world, and leads to the largest continental empire in history.  In the Mid 13th century, Temujin, later known as Chiggis Khan (Ghengis Khan to the West) would create the most terrifying military machine in history to that point, which would wipe out whole civilizations.   So suddenly all these Mongols show up and wipe out…basically everything.  The Rus?  Gone.  The Civilization that originated both Russia and Ukraine is now definitely gone for good.  The Mongols keep the East, which becomes part of the “Golden Hoard”, while the west reforms as the Galician-Volhynian Principality, and eventually gets eaten by Poland and Lithuanian.  

Now there have been entire series of books written about the culture, political structure and history of the Kievan Rus but what matters to us is its legacy in the historical memory of Slavic nationalists, the Rus is considered the origin point of both Russia and Ukraine, and many Russian nationalists feel that Kiev is there birthright.  For Americans, this can be a bit hard to imagine because the US has never lost major territory in its history but imagine if Pennsylvania became an independent nation, and now we have all these places of national significance in another country.  Hell we can take this further, Imagine if the East Coast became independent, and Texas history books talk about the founding of the US, but all of the places where the US was created are now outside there territory.   Now that isn’t a justification, “oh my ancestors once lived there so I get to invade’ is stupid.  Also the later Principality of Moscow and the Princedom of Galicia-Volhynia will each claim to be the “true” heir to the Rus, in a manner very similar to the Holy Roman Empire actually.  This isn’t the only thing causing the conflict, but nationalist fanfiction about the origin of the Slavs still plays a major role in modern politics.  This also is a big part of why Russian nationalists don’t consider Ukraine a thing, to them Ukraine is just a different part of Russia with funny accents, not their own nation with their own history.  The Russian conquest of Ukraine (the first one) was presented as a reclaiming of traditional Russian land, not the taking of a foreign land.

Next time, Russian history, because nothing says “I’m going to explain the conflict in Ukraine” like spending most of it on Russia. 

[artinpl]

Portrait of Hurrem Sultan (Roxelana, ca. 1504-1558), attributed to the German school of the early 17th century

This copy of Titian's painting from 1542 (with attributes of Saint Catherine of Alexandria), once thought to depict Catherine Cornaro, is in the National Gallery in Prague. It comes from the collection of Václav Hořejš (1898-1990), owner of a gallery and auction house in Prague. According to the inscription at top right: Sophij Persaru / Imperatoris / Vxor, it depicts the wife of the Persian shah named Sophia, a common female name in Eastern Orthodox countries ...

Browse >>> Renaissance Poland-Lithuania - The Realm of Venus - Art in Poland (Artinpl) >>> for more …

Identification of the sitter by Marcin Latka (Artinpl), 25.02.2023

Interesting and useful? Now you can buy me a coffee.

[bobemajses]

Different ethnic groups of the historical Bukovina region (today part of Ukraine and Romania) on a postcard from Austria: Romanians, a Jew, Hutsuls, Lipovans und Ruthenians.