early supernatural aesthetic
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from Australia
seen from Thailand
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Yemen
early supernatural aesthetic
x: oh, you don't understand. Sam from the first season was so sweet, cute, a radiant ray of sunshine, so tiny.
like that son of a bitch looked:
he was a sweetheart if you were dean and a victim whose patience you hadn't exhausted, but in the second instance, he wanted to hit a guide and had to be pushed back by dean before he hit an older man HAHAHJSAHD
bbygurl is bbygurling hard
Is this not how it went?
s1 Sam reminds me of a wet dog. I miss his hair from s1.
Been rewatching Supernatural and felt like trying out paint tool with a little season 1 Sammy as my muse.
Little out of practice, I couldn't capture his puppy dog eyes as well as I'd've liked
A lot of people seem to be taking that "s1 sam is kinda spoiled" post as wank and sam negative/dean glorifying and... idk if I'm just reading it wrong, but I didn't take it that way AT ALL, and seeing people pop off upset over it is weird rn. I'm kinda reeling. It's just...commentary on s1 dynamic? Yeah 'spoiled' is not exactly the term I would've used, but I didn't take it as a negative like others apparently have??
Bratty, somewhat self centered S1-Sam is my beloved. Because he has to be that way. Because he doesn't have all the info --and that's not his fault, and it was self preservation to want out of that life, but the fact remains that some of the things Sam doesn't KNOW he doesnt know gives him space to BE self centered. Most young people are self centered in some way -- this is not a moral judgement; it's how brains work. And Sam HAD to be self centered, because he was so often responsible for himself.
Sam being alone a lot does not negate the ways his family sheltered and babied him, though. Some people also seem upset about this word choice, as if it means Sam had it easy and didn't have to deal with the trauma of hunting life -- um, NO, that is not what I mean. When people shelter and baby someone, it hampers their agency. Life is multifaceted that way. The reasons for doing it may come out of deep love -- in spn it's a combination of misguided love AND emotional self protection that lead both John and Dean to not tell Sam key things about their life. Even so, Sam not having all the information DOES affect his behavior -- even his snark -- but because of the baby of the family effect, s1 Sam isn't even aware of some of the ways Dean tried to protect him by omission; has seemingly never considered there's things about Dean he doesn't know, or aspects to situations he wasn't aware of at the time -- things that may have, in his own opinion, changed how he reacted to Dean about it.
Maybe it's the part about Dean sheltering Sam from truths 'the way a mother would' that has everyone really upset. I think the post took liberties with their read of parentified Dean there, but I still enjoy the idea that some things Dean never told Sam was him trying to preserve some vestiges of Sam's innocence. Liking/exploring that idea doesn't have to mean thinking Dean was a selfless paragon of motherly virtues or whatever. C'mon, y'all -- nuance.
The silly >.<