#scironex

[kynimdraws]

I've only played Advance Wars 1 - The GBA one - but I gotta say, your Andy almost looks more like Andy than the official one. For real, though, I love the expressions you give him.

sakjdfjkajlksdjf thank you ;w;

icb I'm assigned CEO of Andy Advance Wars

[taffybuns]

Hi, are you on Cohost? I reblogged a post from someone saying they are, and I want to also follow them over there, but I can't remember who it is.

sorry, not me ! all my social medias are linked in my pinned and bio. hope you find that person though!

[splendidcitrus-arts]

Crag, Psychic Surge

PANK

[splendidcitrus]

Revali, Usuki

wasn’t sure to barbie-fy Revali in the way the usuki brush technically barbifies the Usul or just give him a design based on an Usuki Usul so i did the latter

[the-videodame]

Signe and Teldryn, 5. But, like, in a badass, back-to-back way.

MEME TEAM DREAM TEAM

[dahniwitchoflight]

Grimdark might just be an indicator that one has ultimately failed their role (for lack of better words) whether it be from overembracing or inversion. Certainly, there have been other instances of such, but maybe Grimdark is just the farthest extremes? Like, Vriska chronically overembraced her role, but it never got so far that her role was essentially her entire personality. Rose got to the point where she couldn't even speak (void), and Jade lost any semblence of foresight (space).

the problem with that is that Vriska herself is the poster child of overembracing Light, Light pretty much IS her entire personality, especially when she’s at her most selfish

as is Caliborn and LE being overembracers of Time even moreso than Vriska

so if Caliborn/LE doesn’t even get that dark visual indicator “grimdark” than who does? and why?

what about Aradia when she was dead? she literally lost her entire personality to her inversion during that state, and only regained it once she god tiered back to life, that’s quite clear in her case, yet she never “goes grimdark”

again there’s just, no set definition that will fit every single case, the term itself is just a meaningless term, used by people who can kinda tell something bad’s going on with a particular character, but not exactly what or why

[tratserenoyreve]

I was extremely confused for a moment, because the interest rates I was thinking of were the ones on savings accounts. i.e. the system that grants you money. (Though I would be interested in hearing if THOSE are harmful as well.)

savings accounts can be bs too depending on how your bank handles it, especially since premium rates are given to people who already have excess wealth, meaning a guy with a million in his account can have a 7.25% interest rate or something similar that quickly returns a decent amount of money just by existing versus a person who can only manage to have maybe a couple hundred saved as their cushion who only gets a 1.15% interest rate on their savings.

i think my rate is something less than 3% on my account? which is bs since the bank overall has a much higher interest rate given to it purely by having your money in it.

like, have you ever bought something off of an apple service, like the itunes store? you’ll notice that the purchase takes a few days to complete, right? what’s happening is that while your money is in limbo, it’s accruing interest. so that ten dollar purchase you made becomes something like 10.75 once the company receives it. they get free money purely by holding it.

i may be exaggerating some percentages, i don’t know the exact amounts, but the point still stands that it’s bs that corporations are able to accumulate free money from millions of microtransactions thanks to delaying purchases to take advantage of interest rates that are unfairly skewed in their favor.

the trend of purposeful delays in service and roundabout deliveries of payment can be seen in a lot of things in the US, from how medical care works to the delivery industry, and it exists purely to manipulate, accumulate, and take advantage of interest rates.

[bran-draws-things]

Kass

musical bf (bird-friend)