Ok, a little tangent based on my War Thunder: Why do people think that the Tiger 1 is this killing machine that is invulnerable to Shermans and T-34s l? I know they were hyped up, but really? I done experiments with Realistic with my M4 76mm Sherman, and I found I can tank multiple shots from Tiger 1s in the front. Very few hit my notable weak spots in the armor, ie the Machine Gun Port. And I can hit Tigers with well placed shots. Why people go for the Tiger 1 is beyond me, with the Panther series being superior in most ways, including firepower.
I also did a run within the Tiger 1 H(a 'better' version), and found out that the Tiger has trouble penning Shermans from the front by just pointing at the tank. I had to aim. On the flip side, I found out that the Tiger 1 was too vulnerable to 'inferior' tanks from the front, with well placed shots.
What I'm saying is that people have a "Tiger is invincible" problem. It does dumbfound to see a large number of Axis teams being made up of Tiger 1s. I normally run inferior tanks, such as Panzer 4s and the like. Anyways, that's the end of my Ted Talk, have fun this Sunday!
