I think I get what you’re saying about individual actions. But if no one brings awareness to an issue, how can collective actions ever take place in the first place? Some people need to have their eyes opened first.
So I have several thoughts about this. The first is that collective action needs to be led by people resisting their own oppression. I don't think that migrant workers or queer Qataris need to be made aware of their oppression.
This exposes one of the problems with 'awareness' - is that it absolutely centres those who are not oppressed, rather than those who are.
That's why I don't think raising awareness about what's wrong with the world is very useful most of the time. What's important is to raise awareness of how people are resisting and how it's possible to act in solidarity with their resistence.
The other thing I'd say is that I wasn't arguing that people should speak up and raise awareness (although I'm sceptical about the political impact). But responding to anons who appeared to argue that failure to speak about a particular issue to raise awareness is a grave moral failing.
As well as disagreeing with that moral framework - I also think it's terrible politics. The idea that everyone must speak about everything amplifies the wrong voices and crowds the discussion with people with loud voices and nothing to say. Who the fuck cares what someone in the UK, who has no special knowledge or expertise, has to say about Qatari's oppression of queer people or labour system?