Do you think slashers have like state fairs where they all come together, and there's ribbons being handed out but instead of biggest tomato or best pig, they get ranked on most creative kill with an unconventional weapon
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Kosovo

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Brazil
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from China
Do you think slashers have like state fairs where they all come together, and there's ribbons being handed out but instead of biggest tomato or best pig, they get ranked on most creative kill with an unconventional weapon
Just want to put a clarification.
The black phone is NOT a slasher movie. The grabber is NOT a slasher. I am just getting super technical with terminology, you don’t have to listen but hear me out.
Slasher movies are the movies like Halloween, nightmare on elm street , Friday the 13th etc. Where a big bad hacks and SLASHES through a main cast of teens etc etc. Not much plot besides a good ol chase and kill. Sometimes there’s motivation, sometimes they’re just evil etc .The black phone, despite being around abduction, murder etc. We only - to my memory- get two on screen deaths.
The Grabber is a Spree killer.
Quite literally by definition. He’s much more like real life killers than slasher villains, which is one of the reasons I love this movie so much? The degree of realness/rooting with true crime etc. It’s fresh compared to how horror now likes to overuse the slasher genre(which I’m still a fan of btw).
He’s a crime of passion type killer. Also staying to the particular suburb(where as depending on the kind, slashers will follow and go anywhere. Usually without limitation or worry)
This is just me mumbling about semantics. I’m not saying you can’t compare or put him in with other fictional killers just that he’s not a Slasher like most.
After being found guilty of murder, Caril Fugate broke down in tears as she was lead out of the courtroom. She was only fourteen-years-old when she was sentenced with life in prison. Between November, 1958 and June, 1959 Fungate accompanied her boyfriend, Charles Starkweather, who was five years her senior, on a murder spree in which they claimed eleven lives. Those victims included Fugate’s mother, Velda Bartlett, her stepfather, Marion, and Betty Jean, her baby sister.
Friday the 13th Asks 🔪
Send in a match up, (character) vs Jason Voorhees, and I'll tell you who I think would win in a fight
Slasher 🚫 Murderer
Slasher 🚫 Film with murderer
Slasher 🚫 The grabber
Slasher 🚫 The black phone
Guys it’s quite literally the opposite of a slasher and never intended to be a hack and slash teenage gore fest I don’t know where this expectation came from but I’m losing it.
I feel like now days in the dull of horror people started using “slasher” to mean killer when it’s a very specific term?? Like the grabber is a spree killer (crime of passion killer. Little breaks. Constant) and the movie is more of a supernatural true crime drama so I’m genuinely at a loss here
Barry Loukaitis, who started shooting his classmates during a maths lesson in 1996. The fourteen-year-old shot and killed his teacher, Mrs. Caires, along with students Arnold Fritz, Jr. and Manuel Vela. He then took the class hostage, telling them “This sure beats algebra, doesn’t it?”
“Before I realised what I was doing, the gun had gone off”
On March 8th 2013, Nathon Brooks, a high-achieving and apparently happy 14 year-old from Moses Lake, Grant County, Washington, walked into his parents’ bedroom while they were sleeping and shot both of them multiple times in the head. No one, not even Nathon, seems exactly sure why he did it. Chilling CCTV footage from the night shows Nathon running through the house in his underwear, carrying a revolver, just prior to the shooting. We now know, from Nathon’s confession in police custody, that he had taken the .22 Smith and Wesson pistol from a locked case in a bedroom within the house, walked into his parents bedroom, aimed and emptied the pistol.
-CCTV footage from the night shows Nathon running through the house in his underwear carrying a gun. It is unclear why the cameras were set up in the first place.
Remarkably, both parents survived and were conscious enough to make the 911 call. Beth Brooks was shot beneath the eye and has permanent damage to her sight. Nathon’s dad, Jon, was shot in the forehead. When the police arrived on the scene, Nathon was treated as a victim initially and stated that a tall man with a mask broke into the house and shot his parents. It wasn’t until detectives saw the video footage that they discovered that the Brooks’ own son was the “intruder”. Nathon immediately admitted to his crimes and showed a great deal of remorse.
After Jon and Beth’s ordeal, they went through PTSD and struggled to sleep at night. They moved into a new home after the incident, partly to escape painful memories. It’s hard to comprehend how the parents could begin to come to terms with what had happened, but Jon perhaps makes a telling comment when he says, “I’m extremely good at bottling up emotions.”
- Forgiving: Jon and Beth visiting Nathon in prison.
Though the true motive for the shocking attack is still unclear, Nathon expressed that he was sick of the strict rules back at home and that him getting grounded was what finally caused him to snap. He stated that his father banned him from participating at a basketball tournament and that was the final trigger. Unlike most shooters, Nathon speaks candidly about his crime, a crime that could have easily resulted in a much more severe double homicide. His remorsefulness has earned his parents’ forgiveness, though it’s likely their relationship will never be the same again.
Nathon’s story was told in the critically acclaimed BBC Documentary, I Shot my Parents.
In American slang, the phrase “going postal” means flying into an uncontrollable rage at work. It’s likely many of us have had moments where we’ve felt like this, but the origins of this saying are a lot darker than you’d expect.
In 1986, a post office worker by the name of Patrick Sherrill shot 20 of his post office co-workers, killing 14 of them and drastically injuring the rest. He then ended the rampage by fatally shooting himself in the forehead.
As is the norm with most rampages, the perpetrator’s motives are unclear and shrouded in rumour. Sherrill said he felt ridiculed and berated by the post office management. He was constantly being messed around and given less hours than his co-workers, which made him angry. Other sources claim that he was an irritable worker who was under performing due to his poor attitude. Records show that he was reprimanded by his supervisors on the day before the shooting, so it’s likely that the bitterness he felt over this caused him to ultimately snap and take so many lives with him.