Now i may have just read 1 wikipedia article about ben smith and skimmed 1 article to find out what he meant by resistance journalism but. He's the one who published the trump documents no one else wanted to touch. Vs ronan farrow? Meticulously sourcing and fact checking his work and showing how he did so in a published book which i did read with a critical eye.
Like from just the most superficial perspective it seems a little hypocritical
that’s part of what was so gallingly hypocritical -- smith has arguably the biggest resistance journalism stain on his record of any journalist working today but he gets an nyt column and suddenly he wants to talk about how ronan farrow is a supposedly sloppy resistance journalist who leaves out details to push narratives in an opinion column that had to immediately be corrected twice and left out key details to push a narrative he wanted readers to believe with a clickbait hack headline? give me a break.









