#syria discourse

[reginalucem-archive]

darudma replied to your post: laxreinextwilit replied to your post: ...

YOURE SHITTING ME

//I FUCKING WISH M8

[reginalucem-archive]

houndofhyrule replied to your post: houndofhyrule replied to your post: ...

Reading further (without using just the NYT… like please give me other news sources) apparently there were 86 deaths in the chemical attack against civilians. So in a way, I can see the justification of attacking Syria. Obama said he would have direct military intervention if the leader didn’t go through with the chemical weapon ban and I guess this is a follow up to that promise.

//On the surface, that will probably be the justification. But the cheeto hasn’t done anything that hasn’t benefited him or his property, so I still believe there was an ulterior motive

[reginalucem-archive]

houndofhyrule replied to your post: houndofhyrule replied to your post: ...

Where this really strikes hard is that the leader of Syria signed a chemical weapon ban with Obama after being threatened with direct military intervention after a chemical weapon attack. So I guess this is a follow up on that threat. I can see the reasons but this is going to end badly. Who knows how many chemical weapons they have underground.

//And I haven’t heard ANYTHING about congressional discussion. Which worries me a hell of a lot

[reginalucem-archive]

houndofhyrule replied to your post: houndofhyrule replied to your post: ...

Reading more into it, apparently the Syrian leader used chemical warfare against civilians. That’s fucking horrible. I’m still reading into it though but it seems a military airstrip was targeted.

//I heard on Twitter, and i remember the chemical warfare as well. Still unacceptable imho because this canNOT lead anywhere good