tartpants replied to your post: First anon here: you missed the point of my ask -...
Tell that to the thousands of people studying psychoanalytic criticism within the field of literary studies? It’s not about diagnosing characters and using the DSM, but is rooted in the theories of Lacan, Kristeva, Zizek, Jung, and others. I understand being frustrated when your field is simplified or misunderstood by laymen, but I see a lot of misunderstanding and simplification about literary studies in both of these posts.
Then it has nothing to do with the point made here, though? I may be missing the connection entirely, but this whole debate was (to me) solely about using medical diagnosis applied to literature.
Like it’s not about not analyzing psychologically, it is specifically about not misusing medical terminology where it doesn’t belong.












