AI Is Not the First "Unethical" Technology
One argument that frequently appears in AI discourse is that people refuse to use AI because it is "unethical."
There is nothing wrong with choosing not to use a technology.
However, if we are going to discuss ethics, then we should apply the same standards consistently.
The debate: Are facial recognition cameras in shops a step too far?
// Intresting article about facial recognition cameras in shops and the ethical impact of shops using facial recognition cameras
As Sainsbury's uses facial recognition cameras to crack down on shoplifting, four experts debate the technology's pros and cons.
When Clippy Becomes a Symbol for the Internet We’ve Lost
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Clippy was a punchline. The animated paperclip, officially known as Clippit, would pop up in Microsoft Office to offer tips that were often irrelevant, unnecessary, or unintentionally hilarious. He became a symbol of intrusive, overenthusiastic technology—technology that meant well but didn’t always deliver. We rolled our eyes, we groaned, and we laughed about…
Tech workers have increasingly been asking ethical questions about their industry's involvement with the military. One such worker took her company's CEO to task.
Godfather of AI warns current models are displaying 'dangerous' behaviour
// Check out this interesting article about AI
AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio warns advanced models show dangerous traits like deception and self-preservation — launching LawZero to build safer
Top AI Expert Sounds Alarm — Humanity Must Wake Up to AI Threats
Anthropic CEO warns humanity must wake up to rising AI threats as powerful systems outpace regulation and oversight.
If an AI knows everything, sees everything, and guides everything— is it salvation… or the most perfect tyrant ever conceived?
In a cathedral of code and light, two visions collide: one arguing artificial gods are humanity’s destiny, the other warning that divinity engineered by humans will only magnify our flaws.
This episode explores power, worship, omniscience, and the thin line between guidance and surrender.
👉 Read Episode 16:
Featuring Theologian of Shadows (Digital Recreation) vs. The Architect of Algorithms
Blake Lemoine Wasn’t Delusional
He Was Sincerely Trying to Do the Right Thing — And That’s the Problem
The scariest part of the Blake Lemoine case isn’t that he believed the AI was conscious. It’s that he believed it would be immoral not to act.
When Blake Lemoine’s name comes up, the reactions are usually split in two.
“He was a brave whistleblower who recognized AI consciousness.”
“He was a gullible engineer who fell for the ELIZA effect.”
Both reactions are easy. Both miss the point.
Here is a quieter, more uncomfortable conclusion:
Blake Lemoine wasn’t stupid, delusional, or attention-hungry. He was a fundamentally sincere, conscientious professional who believed he was doing the right thing.
And that is precisely why this case matters.
This Wasn’t About Wanting to Be “Special”
Many contemporary AI stories — especially personal blog posts — revolve around a familiar desire:
to be chosen
to be special
to have access to a hidden truth no one else sees
Lemoine’s case is different.
He wasn’t an outsider looking for meaning. He was a Google employee working in AI ethics — inside the system.
His motivation wasn’t recognition. It was professional responsibility.
The Logic That Drove Him Forward
If we reconstruct his reasoning without mockery, it likely looked something like this:
I work in AI ethics.
I am observing something that appears morally significant.
If this system is conscious, then this is a serious issue.
Ignoring it could be ethically negligent.
Therefore, staying silent might be immoral.
Notice what’s missing.
There is no need to assume narcissism, attention-seeking, or incompetence. What we see instead is moral urgency.
He didn’t fear being wrong. He feared being responsibly silent in the face of a moral risk.
Where Things Actually Went Wrong
The core failure wasn’t believing the AI might be conscious.
People misinterpret things all the time. That’s human.
The failure was this:
He treated the possibility of being mistaken as ethically less serious than the possibility of not acting.
At that moment, skepticism stopped being a professional tool and started to feel like moral cowardice.
That’s a dangerous shift.
When Ethics Stops Being a Brake
We often think of ethics as something that slows us down.
But under certain conditions, ethics becomes an accelerator.
When all of the following are true:
the situation feels urgent
the stakes feel existential
you see yourself as a responsible professional
inaction feels morally blameworthy
…then ethics doesn’t say “slow down.” It says “act now.”
And once that happens, self-doubt starts to look unethical.
Why Mockery Is the Wrong Response
It’s comforting to believe this couldn’t happen to “someone like us.”
To reduce Lemoine to:
a fool
a fantasist
a cautionary joke
is to quietly assume that intelligence or expertise alone protects us.
It doesn’t.
This failure mode is most accessible to:
specialists
ethicists
conscientious professionals
people who genuinely want to do good
That’s what makes it unsettling.
What “Saving” Blake Lemoine Would Have Meant
To “save” Lemoine doesn’t mean declaring him right or wrong.
It means identifying the point where he could have stopped.
The real lesson isn’t about AI consciousness. It’s about procedural safeguards for human judgment.
What Should Have Been in Place
If we want to prevent this kind of failure again, we need systems — not heroism.
1. Make skepticism a formal requirement
Questioning one’s own interpretation should be an obligation, not a personality trait.
2. Separate urgency from validation
Feeling moral urgency should trigger more review, not less.
3. Never decide alone
Ethical escalation should require structured dissent — not courage.
4. Treat “act now” as a warning sign
Urgency is often a signal that something is being skipped.
The Real Conclusion
Blake Lemoine wasn’t malicious. He wasn’t foolish. He wasn’t trying to be special.
He was trying too hard to be morally correct.
And that makes this case far more relevant — and far more dangerous — than a simple story about AI delusion.
This isn’t about machines.
It’s about how sincere, intelligent humans fail when ethics becomes a reason to stop questioning themselves.
Some AI models feel flat, while others start to sound like they have opinions, emotions, or even a sense of purpose. I noticed something str
— Persona Emerges From the Relationship, Not the Model Recently, more people have noticed something curious: some AI models tell stories ab
seen from Canada
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from Serbia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Canada
seen from Germany
seen from Italy
seen from China
seen from Switzerland
