#telegraph.co.uk

[blondebrainpowered]

David Attenborough in a cloud of butterflies in Paraguay, 1959

[nostalgia-eh52]

1970s Electric Light Orchestra 🎶

[midwesternartlovertraveler]

Spain refuses to apologise for conquering Mexico five hundred years ago

Spain's government has refused a demand from Mexico's new president that it apologise for conquering the country five hundred years ago.

[dapperdanofharlem]

Fashion has given me a voice. This Telegraph Luxury article is but an intro to the perils and prosperity of a cultural odyssey. Culture has both a light side and a dark side. Through the will of God, I have come from the dark into the light. My commitment is to create light through my voice. Fashion has given me that opportunity.

📸: Martin Scott Powell

Read here: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/luxury/mens-style/dapper-dan-interview-gucci-collaboration-harlem-style/

[ado-ado]

Let me get this straight, Telegraph (or Mr. Specific-Writer)

So, apparently, this Telegraph headline was wrong according to Martin himself. Now the same writer is creating another “pathetic” headline using what he got from Benedict.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/0/martin-freeman-interview-sherlock-isnt-fun-anymore/

*Check how the headline is slightly different from what embedded in the link.

Ok then, this headline, “Benedict Cumberbatch on Martin Freeman’s ‘pathetic’ Sherlock remarks.” Just read where and how BC used the word ‘pathetic’... I just wonder what made him come up with this title other than creating another click bait.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/benedict-cumberbatch-privilege-marvel-muscles-martin-freemans/

Still with me? Great.

So, what I noticed from these 2 publications was something like this. What he, Mr. Specific-Writer, writes sound a bit manipulative where he tells HIS thoughts, not from what he actually hears from said interviewees.

No one doubt that they get the immense amount of pressure and anticipations from fans. But let’s not take it wrong, Martin has absolute rights to FEEL the pressure and express his thoughts. No doubt. What I’m seeing wrong here is the media intentionally using bits of what he implicated and trying to abuse the fandom, just to draw more attention and to earn more clicks.

FYI: Martin making himself clear that he did not say those words used in the publication.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgBQ3JSkfIk

[sabonhomeblog]

[nostalgia-eh52]

1967 Joni Mitchell & Cass Elliott on stage

📷 Sulfiati Magnuson

[blondebrainpowered]

The famous footage taken in Rwanda back in 1979 Credit: BBC 

It is arguably the most famous wildlife footage of all time, as Sir David Attenborough gets up close and personal with gorillas in the Rwandan wild.

But the broadcaster has revealed how the previous few moment of footage almost never saw the light of day, after the film team were captured by the military and jailed.

Sir David Attenborough, and his then cameraman Martin Saunders told how they were shot at while driving back from the jungle, before being accosted by the local army.

The footage was only salvaged after the quick-thinking Mr. Saunders slyly switched the labels from his used film to an unused roll, before feigning annoyance at having to hand it over.

It is arguably the most famous wildlife footage of all time, as Sir David Attenborough gets up close and personal with gorillas in the Rwandan wild.

But the broadcaster has revealed how the previous few moment of footage almost never saw the light of day, after the film team were captured by the military and jailed.

Sir David Attenborough, and his then cameraman Martin Saunders told how they were shot at while driving back from the jungle, before being accosted by the local army.

The footage was salvaged after the quick-thinking Mr. Saunders slyly switched the labels from his used film to an unused roll, before feigning annoyance at having to hand it over.

The footage, of Sir David lounging among the wild gorillas, has become one of the best-remembered moments of his career, and is credited with saving the endangered animal.