Discover Top Posts Tagged with #theme1

Fantasy ✦ Semi Eita

✦ Pairing: Semi Eita x fem!reader

✦Warnings: dc, yandere, nsfw, smut, alcohol and weed use, sex under the influence, spit, oral (m. receiving), face fucking, fingering, full nelson position, anal play, creampie. All characters are aged up! Time skip spoilers ahead!

✦Word Count: 2.7k

✦Written for the HQ in the Club dark content collab! Masterlist to the other writers can be found here!!

✦A/N: Thank you to my betas @bunbyy, @garoswife @oneblonded

A special thanks to @atsumuse !!! Without your help, my fic would not be where it is! So thank you so so so much Mimi!!!!

Also how could I so rudely forget!! Thank you to Yuli for the wonderful idea!! Without you it would not be here!! You are definitely a lifesaver!! @anime-nymph

#tw yandere #yandere haikyuu #semi x reader #semi eita #semi smut #semi eita smut #haikyuu imagines #haikyuu!! x reader #dark content #tw dc #tw dc mention #haikyuu!! fanfiction #haikyuu smut #dc #hqintheclub #cafe employee #underrated character corner #greyscollab #theme1

My first collab -open

Hello! I am doing my first collab, with a twist. I will have two themes, you can either do both or pick one. Ones dark content and the other is not (unless you want it to be)

The first theme is:

My nii/nee-chan's best friend

You are trying to get with your nii/nee-chan's best friend, or you're already with them and your nii/nee-chan is against it. (The character you're writing about is suppose to be your brothers best friend, sorry if I didn't make that clear 😅 I hope this makes sense if not feel free to DM me)

The second theme is:

"Are you crazy!?"

Yandere, possessive, manipulative, gaslighting, cheating, dubcon, basically toxic relationship. Or any other dark content you'd like to add. ⚠️YOU MUST TAG ALL THE TRIGGER WARNINGS ⚠️

Rules:

You MUST be 18+ to join. Minors go away.

You can choose to do one theme or both! Totally up to you! If you do both you can pick a different character for each theme. The word count minimum is 500 words if you'd like to write more than the minimum go ahead! Drabbles, full fics, head cannons, drawings/images welcome.

Open to all fandoms! Send me an ask or a DM of who you'd like, the fandom, and which theme you're doing or if you're doing both.

Dark content is a must for "Are you crazy" but if you'd like to include dark content to "My nii/nee-chan's best friend" you are more than welcome to! SFW is welcome for the first theme as well! TAG EVERYTHING CORRECTLY PLEASE

The due date is September 2nd ☺️

Please reblog after you are added to the list. 💞 When you're ready to submit your work please tag me and use #GreysCollab and either #theme1 or #theme2 to keep everything organized. 💞

✨ THANK YOU! ✨

HAIKYUU:

Theme 1:

Theme 1: Matsukawa @haikyutiehoe

Theme 1: Iwaizumi @lazy-azie

Theme 1: Kuroo & kenma @bokuroskitten

Theme 1: Levi @ruomii

Theme 1: Makki @solarchuu

Theme 2:

Theme 2: Semi @rosesandtoshi

Both themes:

Both themes: Bakugo and hawks @cupcake-rogue

#GreysCollab #theme1 #theme2 #minors fuck off #all fandoms are welcome #haikuu #mha #my hero academia #AOT #fanfic #drabbles #writing event #first collab #💀-dark content

Countdown for Jiminie's 26th birthday!!!

D-4

#bts #jimin #dailybusans #busanboys #MINIEDAY21 #theme1 #Cutie

Print-at-Home Riverdale Valentines

1. Save file as .png 2. Print as full page image on desired color* of paper** 3. Cut along lines to separate.

*note: white areas will be the color of the paper, see example image. **note: use cardstock for better durability

#riverdaleevents #riverdale #bughead #varchie #cheryl blossom #sweet pea #fangs fogarty #riverdale valentines #theme1 #my edit

#nct #nct dream #nct edit #nct dream edit #renjun #huang renjun #renjun edit #huang renjun edit #kpop #kpop edit #edit #theme1 #pt1 #lol #something a lil different i wanted to try uwu

#Theme1 #Origin1

Death of the Designer?

Introduction

Reading I: Discourse and Authorship in Design Practice

Tintin Rosvik 19.9.2019

Who was the first to make the statement designer as author?

It is an odd question to ask about something that seems to be such a general discussion. Equally odd as Andrew Bennett asking the origin of the first author. But unlike the long list of men given the honour to be called the first author, Michael Rock’s name stands alone in the list of google results when searching for “designer as author” or “designer authorship”. It puzzles me, that though we often refer to authorship in design as a long ongoing and widespread debate, the discussion as we know it today seems to be primarily fuelled by the words of Rock.

Paradoxically, Rock opens his writing by introducing the term authorship, in one form or another, as frequently used in graphic design circles. This indicates that he is actually not the first one to state “the designer as author”, and is probably writing in reaction/response to a previous debate. But who is Rock addressing his critique to? The designers who claimed themselves as authors? If so, why did designers of the time feel the urge to take on an authors’ role? Did they want to take part in the ownership and authority that comes with the term? Or which of all descriptions of authorship did the designers identify with?

What does it mean to call Michael Rock (a graphic designer) an author?

Another question of interest, how come that Rock, who critiqued designers in taking on the role as authors, has himself become the conventional author of this discussion? Conventional in the sense that his writing fits into several of the descriptions of a “pre-Barthes” author:

1. A unified voice. Rock’s text is repeating pre-existing words and thoughts, and at the same time, he is formulating new ideas. In ancient Greek terms: “He both repeats the song and invents it as he sings”. In medieval terms: “he is the auctor who writes both his own words as others, but with his own in prime place and others’ only for purposes of confirmation”.

2. A writer. The author has become synonym with someone who writes, and in Rock’s own words he certainly fits the category, “perhaps the graphic author is actually one who writes and publishes material about design”.

3. © Michael Rock. At the bottom of the text, a small c surrounded by a circle next to the name Michael Rock declares his authorship in terms of being the “originator and therefore the owner of a special kind of commodity, the work”.

Even though Rock is in many ways an author, it is relevant to ask if this authorship is connected to graphic design. Do Rock’s identity and practice as a graphic designer have anything to do with his authorship in writing, or is he merely a writer in this context? I would say his role as a graphic designer is as relevant as in any other part of his practice. Primarily because his thoughts on authorship in graphic design have come to influence the discourse of the field for over two decades. He might not be the first or the only one to say the words, but he certainly has become the original voice of the statement “designer as author”.

Death of the designer?

From a reader’s point of view, it is interesting to take the power of an author’s text and twist it around. I am quite sure I have not read Rock’s text the way he intended and have probably left out all of his key points. Instead, I have taken his words and used them against him, not because I disagree with him but because as a reader, I can.

However, taking this kind of control was not my intention from the beginning and I was only able to break my usual habit of reading because I had Barthes radical words on the top of my mind. I became aware of the fact that we easily fall into conventional roles and that it is much easier to “kill the author” in theory than in practice. Old hierarchies and power relations are hard to owercome when it comes to taking on the role as author or receiver of creative work. Rock for example, establishes his position as an author while critisizing it. That is why I decided to consiously take authority as a reader and analyse Rock's text on more of a meta-level in order to challenge the power balance established by authorship.

Barthes critical writing on authorship was relevant in order to foil a culture of self-appointed geniuses (or the author´s powerful empire) and instead, acknowledge the reader as the endpoint of meaning creation. Looking a few years back on the design industry, I feel like there has been a similar culture present – with high-status designers who have more or less the final say in every aspect of the field. In some ways, it is even hard for me to believe that there ever was a need to claim the conventional form of authorship in terms of ownership, status and credibility. But I am sure there have been times when this was the case.

However, I believe it has been equally important for the design field to gain entrance to “authorship” because of the critical debate initiated by Roland Barthes accompanied by Michel Foucault and others. If nothing else, I believe there was a need for stating designers as authors in order to declare the designer dead.

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px 'Helvetica Neue'; color: blue; line-height: 1.4em;} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px 'Helvetica Neue'; min-height: 15.0px; color: blue; font-style: oblique; letter-spacing: 0.5px;} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 5.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px 'Helvetica Neue'; min-height: 17.0px;color: blue;text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.5px;}

#tintinrosvik #introduction #theme1

INTRODUCTION Reading 1 Jolanda Jokinen 18 09 2019 Author, me? That was the first question which came to my mind when I red the first chapters of this first texts. I have never identified myself as an author in my own design practice. I haven’t heard that term being used in graphic design field in my own point of view. Im that kind of a designer who just practice practice practice. I rarely think about who I am as a designer and what’s my role in this bigger picture. Am I really an author? My first presumption about myself not being an author changed after I red the whole text. Not really changed because I still think that I’m not an author but this text gave me a perspective about that. I have always thought that author is person who writes. But there are many ways how to describe the word and meaning of the word author. It was interesting that the earliest definitions of the word author was not associated with writing. One of the definitions was the word ruler and director. Those words resonated with me. For example I like to work alone and be the only one who is in charge. I want to be the one who rules and decides how, when, where, what to do although as long as you work as a graphic designer you are not your own boss. You always have to consider the clients needs. It was also an interesting to realise that there is also texts which are not authored by anyone for example the old gospels and sacred history texts. These texts reminded me of Arjas ”epägenesis” project which she introduced to us last week. How she made these poems by letting the computer choose randomly the words. Who is an author of that poem and who owns it? I mentioned the word director earlier and how it was one of the first definitions of the word author. Art directors are a common title in creative field and also in film industry where the director is the one who have all the strings in their hands. The directors have to have their own stylistic signature and vision and meaning if they want to success in their own field. As Roger Ebert summed up the idea ”A film is not what it is about, it’s how it is about it”. And I think that this is still valid and appreciated quality in our field - that the director/author/designer have to have a strong personal style. I also liked the idea that designers are not the authors but performers who expresses content through graphic devices. I was thinking about the authorship and the anonymous authors with their manually copied books. Its funny how the writers names became irrelevant because the writers was not known to readers outside their community. It reminds me of advertising. For example when you see a nice poster at the bus stop. They are always anonymous because ”nobody” cares about the makers because the idea is to sell the product or event etc. And even if there was this ”made by advertising agency X” the name would be irrelevant for so many people just because its outside the readers community. And other hand for example in literature and novels the writers name is often the one major factor which sells the books. If the designer or creative person or any kind of person reaches that status of being known in a community, the name will thrive you forward. Its interesting approach to think about authorship in that anonymous perspective. Is it relevant to know who the author is? It was familiar thought that author does not have the power- it belongs to the reader. I was thinking this already when I red the Rocks text. When Im doing for example illustration I often have this inspiration or story or character in my head. But I don’t need to tell that to anyone, when people see the illustration they can create their own story behind it. Im not interested to share what I was thinking and why and when I did it.

#jolanda #theme1 #introduction