Auditors say that the EU's five billion euro Africa fund was "spread too thinly," to address migration, that job creation was overstated and
In a scathing report, the European Court of Auditors said the European Union’s (EU) €5 billion Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF) was "spread too thinly" to address migration as it financed "too broad a range of actions in the areas of development, humanitarian aid, and security." The fund was created at the height of the refugee crisis in 2015 and intended to address the root causes of instability, irregular migration and displaced persons in Africa. But a year before it lapses, the auditors said it didn’t concentrate "enough on priorities," to tackle the root causes of migration. The objectives and priorities were "kept as broad as possible, so that most types of actions could be considered eligible." But some of the projects funded seem to have little to do with migration such as renovation of a Roman theatre in Libya or a radio station in Sahel, the report said. In key findings the auditors said that the allocation, "was not based on migration-specific indicators such as the number of irregular migrants arriving in the EU," job creation was overstated, and human rights risks were not properly addressed. Furthermore, in some cases there was a risk that increased revenue could have the opposite effect of triggering more migration instead of containing it. "Substantial increases in revenue may not automatically lead to greater resilience towards irregular migration but may even trigger a risk of realizing 'dormant' plans of irregular migration – due to the high costs involved and due to the strength of the perception of migration as 'the' key to success and a better future," the report explained. Bettina Jakobsen, the ECA Member in charge of the audit, added that although the EUTF helped to keep migration high on the development and political agenda, there was little change in the "fund’s focus, which remains too broad," despite similar findings in the last report in 2018
continue reading
So, they sat on their hands for 6 years. What's the point in having an audit if you're not going to act on its finding? It's cute that they thought €5bn would cover it, though, like putting a sticking plaster on a gaping wound. €500bn wouldn't cover it.
