#this is solid

[dyke-dyke-goose]

recasting the pitt, but they’re all played by the muppets:

sam eagle as robby

piggy as dana

fozzy as mohan

scooter is obviously whitaker

beaker as javadi

maybe bean bunny as mel

animal as langdon

pepé as ogilvie

janice as joy

gonzo and camila as santos and garcia

and rizzo as mckay

[life-caretaker]

You can scroll if you want. I’m not gonna stop you, How ever I am gonna tell you what I think Activision should do to give us Call of Duty Ghosts 2!

Do I have your attention? Good okay here we go:

They just remade Call of Duty MW2 no I present you this, I don't know much about cod when to ready the fandom wiki to try and understand it more even though I have played many cod games and completed almost all of the campaigns how ever I don't know jack shit. The point is I believe this...

I believe the reason the Ghost team was created was in memory of Ghost right? That would make sense considering the task force dose a lot of things Ghost did like wear spooky balaclavas, Refuse to give up intel, Don't die easy, And are super skilled in their fields. 

Activision makes Call of Duty MW3 a remake. I don't know much about the game but considering the fact that technically Soap and Ghost were supposed to die in the Second game and they didn’t in the remake they will probably kill them off in three.

How ever what if they took a different rout with Ghost? 

What if instead he retires? Or he lives and become captain instead of Soap? then he has a reason to make a new squad because his old one died. 

It would be a lot like the Ghost team they made back in Las Almas and because of this hey would all be trained under ghost and follow his motives we could end Call of Duty MW3 with a really cool cutscene where we get to hear Ghost  talking to a man he Calls Scarecrow and then abruptly ending a game after Ghost says turning to the camera;

“I have a mission for you” We see ghosts face for the first time! and it could Segway into Call of Duty Ghosts. they could remake the game. How ever I feel like the original had a grate story line. What they could do how ever is make a Call of Duty Ghosts 2 explaining what happened to Logan and all that shit because what happened to my baby!?

You got me attached to him and for what!?

So you could drag him away after I thought I killed Rorke?!

Any way I believe this would be a very solid path to go down to continue/bring hype to the franchise. They could also continue down the path of Call of Duty Ghosts. make Logan a bad ass bitch.

Maybe give us a heated love story that end with a bullet through some ones brain and a revenge plot?

I'm just saying! 

They have options... (Activision hire me)

(Feel free to correct any of my knowledge of COD or rant to me about it i’m willing to hear you out just don't get mad at my lack of knowledge.)

[chenlesoulmate]

[virtchandmoir]

A music deep dive with Canadian royalty, Gold Medallists Tessa Virtue & Scott Moir. They remember the early days of making mixed CDs for road trips and Tessa using the library for MSN Messenger. We find out Scott is the better dancer, makes the playlists and doesn't love Hall and Oates like Tessa. Currently diving into documentaries about rock legend Queen, there anthems we hear at arenas and stadiums they don't care for. Scott had bleached blonde hair phase a la Eminem and we discover all of Tessa's nicknames. 

TOPICS 0:00 Introduction 1:00 Scrappy Kids 3:00 Nicknames 3:45 Who’s the Better Dancer? 6:30 Music Anthems We Hate 8:30 Creating The Playlist 9:30 Finding New Music 10:30 The Weeknd 11:45 Queen 14:00 Early Mixtapes / Burning CDs 16:00 Road Trips To Detroit 17:00 The Real Slim Shady 18:30 Cleaning Costumes 19:45 Rock The Rink Tour Ideas

[divine-bloodlines]

Video killed the broadway star

[bipilots]

voltron au where everything is the same except everyone pronounces voltron as "volt-ron"

does Lance start calling it Ron for the laffs and does it stick to everyone’s horror

[it-feels-like-a-perfect-night]

Taylor Swift's New Trademarks: What They Mean (And Don't Mean) For #Swifties

Savvy celebrities file trademarks all the time for ideas and products that may or may not ever come to fruition.

MAR 15, 2017

Taylor Swift fans went wild after a TMZ story speculated that Swift was "done fighting with Spotify" and instead launching her own music streaming service. The evidence? One of Swift's companies, TAS Rights Management, filed a slew of trademarks last month, which was noted by Reddit users several weeks ago. However, despite the filings to use the words "Swiftie" and "Swifties" (the nicknames for Swift's loyal fans) in several categories, including "a website featuring non-downloadable audio recordings [and] video recordings," it's highly unlikely Swift is planning a streaming service of her own anytime soon as TMZ postulates. Why?

For starters, Swift already has a very high profile—and presumably very lucrative—streaming partnership with Apple. Another one of her global partners, AT&T, launched a cross-device video streaming experience called Taylor Swift Now last November. It wouldn't make sense for Swift to compete with these already-established partnerships, and Swift certainly isn't known for making business missteps. You don't become the world's highest-paid celebrity with $170 million in earnings without being an exceptionally smart businesswoman.

Savvy celebrities file trademarks all the time for ideas and products that may or may not ever come to fruition. Sometimes it's done preemptively to keep others from taking ownership of marks that have a strongly perceived tie to the celebrity even though the projects may never see the light of day. For instance, in 2010, Swift filed for permission to use her name on makeup and cosmetics. No such product line was ever developed (although she did lend her name and likeness to CoverGirl around the same time), and the trademark was abandoned in 2014.

Swift's TAS Rights Management currently owns more than 90 active and dead trademarks, including for phrases like "Swiftmas," "Blank Space" and "A Girl Named Girl." Swift herself owns several other trademarks, including her name, various iterations of her logo and signature and other trademarks relating to her albums.

So, what could the filings mean? Perhaps nothing. Or—much more exciting for Swift fans—perhaps they point to an enhanced version of Swift's fan club launching in the months ahead. Swift doesn't currently have a paid fan club, which is unusual for a superstar on her level. Many artists generate hundreds of thousands of dollars of revenue each year from paid membership clubs. Fans, in turn, are granted items like early pre-sale access to concert tickets, exclusive content downloads, annual merch packages and a private forum to communicate.

Since "Swifties" is the term Swift's fans have embraced for years, it seems likely that an official "Swiftie Community" could be in the works to align with Swift's next album launch. Swift's next album release has not been announced, but her past releases suggest it will come this September or October. The specific merchandise trademark categories (musical instruments, clothing, stationary), plus the specific mention of online retail store services and content downloads, all seem to support an impending premium fan club, which would likely exist through both a premium app and a web platform. Swift's official website is run by Wonderful Union, a company well known for managing high-profile artist fan clubs.

Regardless of what the recent trademarks may or may not mean, #Swifties can count on lots more carefully crafted marketing from Swift as the year unfolds.