In Defense of Thomas Boleyn
On our TVs and in our beloved books we see Thomas Boleyn acting like a pimp, using his daughters to gain power within the court of Henry VIII, this fictional tale of Thomas has rather slandered his name, blackened it. So, what was Thomas Boleyns actual thoughts Anne and Mary’s relationship with the king?
Let’s get the first thing out of the way— his status at court. Thomas Boleyn had been climbing through the ranks since the court of Henry VII, and had no need to pimp out his daughters.
Thomas Boleyn, at Henry VIII coronation, was made Knight of the Bath and in the early years of Henry VIII reign was given various offices including keeper of the exchange at Calais and the foreign exchange in England, joint governor of Norwich Castle with Sir Henry Wyatt, Sheriff of Kent. Also in 1518 Thomas Boleyn was made a member of the privy Council, and in 1519 Thomas was made the English ambassador at the French court.
This was all before Mary or Anne Boleyn became involved with the king.
When Mary did start her affair with the king it is very likely that Thomas Boleyn cut loose with her, perhaps disowning her (which isn’t a good thing— but it does contrast the idea of Thomas planning the affair, and supporting it for his own gain).
When Mary Boleyn was widowed after her husband William Carey died from sweating sickness in June of 1528, King Henry VIII had to intervene and ask Thomas to provide for her financially. This suggests that Thomas was taking no care in her, and that they weren’t in an extremely close nor happy relationship during this time.
Distance Chapuys, the imperial ambassador at the court of Henry VIII, records in February of 1533 Thomas Boleyns opposition to the marriage plans between Anne, his daughter and the King.
“𝘐 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘥𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘪𝘭𝘵𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵; 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘰, 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘶𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘕𝘰𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘬 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘮𝘦, 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘒𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘨𝘦,”
“𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘶𝘬𝘦 [𝘕𝘰𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘬] 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘨𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵, 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘒𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮. 𝘏𝘢𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘥𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘨𝘰; 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 (𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘶𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘥) 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳.”
In May of 1533, Chapuys also recorded Anne’s resentment at the opposition of both her father and uncle:
“𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘶𝘬𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘨𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵, 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘒𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮. 𝘏𝘢𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘥𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘨𝘰; 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 (𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘶𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘥) 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳.”
So, in likelihood, Thomas was against the marriage between his daughter Anne and the king, and with the evidence to suggest that Thomas tried to cut ties with his elder daughter Mary after her affair with the king in 1522 and initially didn’t help her when widowed, it can be said almost certainty that Thomas Boleyn didn’t use and manipulate his daughters to boost his own status, nor did he approve of his daughters sexual relations with the king. This is a great contrast to the power-hungry pimp we see on our TVs, and the popular belief of the character and morals of Thomas Boleyn.
ೃ༄
click here for more tudor history
sources: historyextra, the Anne Boleyn files, historyextra, and Wikipedia














