I love making smart characters, they’re my favorite to write. Unfortunately, they’re written by me, who has a brain operated by a goblin with a joystick.
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
I love making smart characters, they’re my favorite to write. Unfortunately, they’re written by me, who has a brain operated by a goblin with a joystick.
(pondering my characters, which i have been calling an old married couple for literal years now) …….would they ever *actually* get married though
The mask we care not for. (INTJ: Post 1)
Behold the Rot: The INTJ as the "Bypasser" of Masks
(We don't want the pretty inheritance of a mask you've spent your life creating; rather, we long for the rot underneath from maintaining it. We want you to face it. Behold yourself in your Becoming yourself, finally!)
Let’s talk about why people are often deeply uncomfortable with INTJs and why we are consistently cast as the villain. It isn’t necessarily the perceived arrogance or the bluntness—that is surface-level noise which may or may not be present depending on what the circumstance calls for. The true issue is that we see the mask you are wearing, and we refuse to engage with it.
This realization surfaced while I was examining my "method-acting" of Henry in a specific scene. His counterpart, Richard Papen, presents a carefully constructed persona: the anxious, repressed intellectual, the "Apollonian" man striving for a sacred ideal. Richard wants Henry to validate this performance… to dance the intricate social dance with him.
Henry’s response: "Does it really matter?"
A simple cut through all of the wordiness of Richard trying to convince himself in the same breath as he was trying to convince Henry that the societal norms that they’ve transcended are still the correct “one true” way. And then, the facing of the truth: it really didn’t matter because they’d moved past that universality mindset into a new one that was not yet defined.
I once saw Henry’s behavior as purely cruel. Now, I understand that his coldness isn’t a lack of empathy; it is a total bypassing of the persona. To an INTJ, a social mask is merely static obscuring the actual signal of who you are. The mask is inefficient, inauthentic, and a waste of time. We aren’t looking at the character you’re playing; we are looking at the underlying operating system. We want to understand how your system works, which is why we often seem cold when we are, in fact, observant in ways few others are.
The Pattern-Detectors of the Shadow
(Please note: I use “shadow” loosely for the reader's familiarity, but I do not see things as dualist as Jung’s system makes them. That’s for another post and essay I’m working on.)
We are "shadow figure" catalysts. We see the contradictions and, if we care enough, we highlight them—which is to say, we bring them to light so others can not just see them, but know they can accept themselves fully as they are. We embody the unspoken fears of the collective: the shadow self fully realized and integrated. We are the ones who will not only see, but profoundly understand the inner mechanisms you are desperately trying to hide from. We engage with these hidden points not because we are “psychos,” or "psychic," but because we are involuntary pattern-detectors. It is simply our autopilot.
To us, masks are just another data set, and their inconsistencies are glaring. When we refuse to play along—when we ignore the performance and respond only to the core truth—it feels like a profound violation to the performer. It triggers reactivity, projection, and rejection. We are refusing to participate in the "societal dance" that everyone has been told is the only correct way to exist. But as a catalyst, I’ve accepted that we aren't meant to be embraced with open arms; a bold truth is rarely loved by those running from it.
I used to tread lightly because people told me that being seen by me felt like being "seen naked to the bone." It is unnerving. To this I say: I don’t mean to be any more frightening than a lightning storm intends to scare, but I am aware of the effect now, and so, I keep it in mind.
It is a shame that we are vilified for not playing along. The real tragedy is the play itself, which serves no one. People would prefer we compliment their lovely curated clothes, while we're busy trying to figure out why they are bleeding through the fabric. To the performer, our inquiry is a rejection of their identity. To us, it's the only honest form of engagement there is. We are trying to connect with the real you, and the mask is in the way.
Sovereignty and the Honest Signal
There is a concept of “Sovereignty” which I’m still fleshing out, but honesty is inherently tied to it. This is why I am forward about my truth, observations, and preferences: I would rather have blunt honesty as a mark of respect for myself than a lie told to "save my feelings." Feelings are fickle and fleeting; they are not the foundation of a dynamic, much less a “self.” To coddle me is the greatest disrespect.
We read between the lines of things you haven't yet acknowledged. We spot the patterns connecting your deepest wounds in a passing comment, yet we completely ignore the elaborate curation of your public self. We see the person, not the act. And for many, that is the most terrifying thing of all.
A Note to My Fellow Catalysts
To my fellow INTJs: remember that when people ignore the "blood seeping into their clothes," they aren't always lying. Many genuinely cannot see or feel parts of themselves. The mask acts as blinders, and society holds the reins. They are often unaware of their own experience.
I am finally at peace with this aspect of myself—this drive to connect only with the human behind every mask. But a lesson I’ve learned the hard way, time and time again, is to listen to a sleeping actress: if they do not wish to be woken up, leave them be in peace. We all have our own necessity in life and cannot force a chapter we are not yet ready for, much less one that isn’t meant for our book to begin with.
Focus on your story. For those that "get it" and wish to share their journey with you, so be it. But do not ever force, for wisdom has taught me this: what must be will always be in the end.
I see my past experiences not as "woe is me" narratives, but as data that expanded my understanding of the human system to which I belong. This is my alignment with Dionysian Monism: the action is less important than the understanding gained from it.
I’m writing this in the hope that others might see themselves represented, or at least come to understand a perspective that sees through the fabric to the heartbeat underneath.
I think Simon is a lot softer, or has the chance to be much softer, than we see in Iron Lung. He just wants to live. He's been jailed for most of his life, absolutely miserable and unloved - why wouldn't he crumble in the face of Grace? Along with his creator saying he'd do exactly that, well...
To kill Arthur again or to let him *unrealistically* survive tb for a happy ending?
Ngl, while working on some of these snippets (and writing the fic on and off the past few months), I’m tempted to make an ask blog for Mr. Puzzles just so I can dump Mr. Puzzles-centric related responses for the fun of it, in order to write him more often (though likely a mix or 1st and 3rd) and maybe sketchy doodles, as I like (tormenting) him because he’s a bastard (affectionate).
But I will be posting that angst snippet tonight, and a silly one to be its opposite either tonight as well, or in the morning.
Writing is staring at a sentence for ten minutes only to change the word "can" to the word "are."
A truly, deeply unserious exercise.
One thing about a Writing Mobster fic — the beginning is gonna take its time.