#three-dimensional

[roosterjohn]

Photo listed in Fine Art. Shot taken in Italy.

[miamaimania]

"Untitled II" by David Hanjani ◆ Earthy layers built up like terrain, topped with a crimson secret

[k00299471]

Sarah Sze. "Seamless"

Sze incorporates objects such as tools,ladders and spirit levels adding other components like miniature wooden bridges .The sculpture sweeps across the space in delicate curves connecting the objects into a larger construct.

The way Sarah Sze uses the wall space opens my mind up to sculpture in the space that you are working in, and the space that is available to you.

[cure-yo-curio]

The Fourth Dimension is something we can't perceive with the eyes.

After putting much thought, we can only imagine what the fourth dimension affects.

When we think of the word "expansion", we usually think of things that scale larger than another. When we use modeling software, we have been always familiar about tweaking the X, Y, and Z-axis to move or resize our objects to a desired direction or orientation. Considering the changes when we tweak such tools, I thought that it would be counted as an event of expansion.

When we put a square in the modeling software, we can see its set measures in every face, edge, and side. However, tweaking the X-axis could move or resize the square into a forward-stretched elongated rectangle. It might have changed the entire shape, but the face that comprised of measurements from the Y and Z-axis remained unchanged. Even when moving the object, the Y and Z positions remain the same.

We could observe the same when we move the Y-axis instead. We could also observe it when we move two axes simultaneously. Suppose that we move both the X and the Z-axis, the width and the position of the Y-axis would still remain the same.

This explains that a three-dimensional object, that we see naturally, can be morphed and moved into different directions. But, to morph the entire figure, it would require the modifications of all three axes. Otherwise, one axis will remain the same.

Now, going back to the thought of expansion. When we put negative values to modify the axes, we don't immediately perceive it as an event of expansion. Rather, for us, we would automatically see it as the opposite -- contraction. When something becomes smaller, it's not expansion. But similarly, contraction can be affected by moving or resizing an object with negative values.

When the square becomes a thinner rectangle by shrinking the X-axis measurement, the Y and Z-axis measurement would still remain the same like how the object would if expanded in the same fashion.

Now, we have been thinking about what the fourth dimension looks like. Personally, I saw a resemblance to how we understood Schrodinger's Cat theory. We will never know how the cat is doing unless we look inside the box. So while the box remains unopened, assumptions can only be made.

Judging by examining the three-dimensions of the cat-containing box, it remains unchanged regardless of the events that could already take place for the cat.

But what if the box was to be expanded and/or contracted? It would still be the same Schrodinger's Cat theory, except we cannot be certain anymore that it's only the cat inside the box. The cat here, could be what the inside of the box contains. It could also contain something else.

This is the idea behind the fourth dimension. I even personally think that we are affected by the fourth dimension. The smaller components that we have and us being part of a larger component, could be the fourth dimension. We can measure the three-dimensional sizes of the Earth, but the fourth dimension could only be assumed at best when viewing the Earth from an outer space perspective. We wouldn't know the exact state of the global population.

Similar to our own physiology, the fourth dimension could apply to the changes in our body. Molecules and bacteria are part of the fourth dimension that could be inside of us.

Given this, how are we supposed to manipulate an object in all four dimensions? The answer is: we can't. We can only manipulate an object in all three dimensions. Because to manipulate all four dimensions, we would have to simultaneously manipulate what comprises the object while we manipulate it's three-dimensional properties. The fourth dimension cannot be modified unless we can directly modify what's inside a solid enclosed object. It can also remain fixed as we modify the three-dimensional properties.

Even things outside the object counts as part of the fourth dimension. It did not mean that what's inside the object multiplied or expanded, it remained fix unless the fourth dimensional properties went through a change by itself like liquid turning into solid by natural freezing.

In conclusion, the fourth dimension is something that cannot be manipulated by physical means. It could be one of the unperceivable dimensions where it can be manipulated through the changes of properties.

[tsa23urban-hostel]

Model Makers: How OMA Transforms Architectural Concepts into Constructed Buildings - Architizer Journal

The Office for Metropolitan Architecture has long integrated model-making into their innovative design practice.

_ik

[growth-opprtunities]

A detailed market study on Global Three-Dimensional Radar Market, with detailed segmentation, key co

[alexartcollections]

Nordic Simple Creative Three-Dimensional Love Cobblestone Canvas Painting Posters and Print Wall Art for Living Room Decor