#traves travis

[mcyt-stuff]

// the Carson situation, grooming //

If you didn’t know already, callmecarson was and/or is sexting a person under the age. The was the ultimate reason of the ending of Lunch Club. There are screenshots on Twitter and a keemstar video with Travis and Noah, his former roommates and lunch club members themselves, claiming these statements to be true.

Now, some speculation,

First off, for me anyways, it’s almost undeniable that Carson had relations with someone under the age. The screenshots are there and even if you say those are fake we have Travis and Noah’s statements.

It fits with the timeline of lunch clubs slowing and stopping point. Also Noah and Travis would have no reason to lie. Even on screen we could see that Travis and Carson were close. Then, when Carson moved out as Cooper, Travis and Noah moved, they weren’t.

People have said “ well why did Ted and Schlatt still film with him if he told all of lunch club?” the only ideas that I have is

1. As Noah stated Carson said he was gonna “get his head right”, so maybe they believed him

2. Carson’s views were high so they used him as gain

Overall, he has to have done something with the minor(s). I don’t know who else knew at the time or if Carson only told lunch club. Keemstar stated there will be another video with more evidence tomorrow.

My heart goes out to the victim/(s) and a thanks to Travis and Noah for coming forward with this

[mcyt-stuff]

Let’s just replace Josh with Carson when referring to lunch club

[mcyt-stuff]

Hello!

As a lot of you know Lunch Club make it very clear they have a problem with stans. Some of them have different limits but they all agree that in general they are not comfortable with stans.

A counter argument I’ve seen has been that “not all stans are like that”. The term Stan literally means “stalker-fan” which implies these people do stalker-like actions.

In other situations with different content that might be acceptable (ie tv shows or movies) however these are real people, not characters. If you call yourself a stan and also don’t agree with these people pushing boundaries I would recommend no longer associating with the term.

As I have said before liking content and fan art is fine. Creating things such as fanfiction about them doing bad things or things they wouldn’t do comfortably, pushes limits. Other creators may encourage it (ie Quackity) however Lunch Club members have specifically stated that it makes them uncomfortable.

As a fan respect that, don’t go trying to justify your actions or saying it’s ok. Accept their boundaries or stop creating things that push them.

Think before you post.

Look at what your about to post and ask yourself...

Would they be comfortable seeing this?

Would you be comfortable seeing this of yourself?

Have they stated before that content like this makes them uncomfortable?

People have been upset lately with the creators talking negativity about stans and blocking them. Like I said before the term Stan is negative already. Call yourself something different if you don’t follow the stalker-fan agenda.

Also before you get upset about them disliking stans go back and see the issues they’ve had with them in the past. (An old Carson stream was based on it so go check that out for more context)

We all have a right to create and post as we please. However, with that notion, be respectful to the creator. They give us wonderful content and giving back to them something that makes them uncomfortable is not ok.

Lunch Club members are real people with real emotions and discomforts.

Those of you who do make fan art and things that respect their wishes, keep up the great work!