made me think of this (a foreigner on the street in the evening of zhongyuan festival in singapore)

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Morocco

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from Russia

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Portugal
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Maldives
seen from Spain
seen from Türkiye
made me think of this (a foreigner on the street in the evening of zhongyuan festival in singapore)
Source | Day 78
I have another Vivziepop critical post to make. This time it is a VERY important post on stereotypes and how they cause harm to society. We will be looking at three parallel cases.
We all know Angel Dust being a harmful gay stereotype, right? Gay men have spoken about this, only to be shut down by Viv and her cult. Here is one of the complaints:
Remember the musical Pokémon Live? For those who don't know, it was a touring stage show from the 2000s featuring the characters from the original series (Ash, Misty, Brock, Team Rocket, ect.)
Well for those who don't know, James of Team Rocket was played by Andrew Rannells, a gay man. Well basically, in the musical, James was written like a stereotypical gay man (very familiar, right?) Years after the musical, Andrew did a video on his experience as the character in it and said some things that well, upset stans. Although he was grateful for the experience and being with the cast, he felt very uncomfortable being James and didn't want to offend anyone, thinking of all the queer kids who would watch it in person on on TV. During the pre-show he was thinking of making James different and not offensive like in the script, but the directors and the team said otherwise, that he needed to follow the script. His stress only worsened once the musical started touring. While explaining his experience, many stans harassed him, saying that he was "being sensitive and pretentious" and that he's "making it up". To those who sent him those hurtful comments, you are not a gay man who feels like he's invalidating his community and feels uncomfortable. He was also not criticizing the show or media, in fact, he's actually a fan of Pokémon. He was actually very grateful for the job, and that the enthusiasm of the kids made his day, and he was also grateful due to him being in a financial crisis before the show, which leads to the next parallel case: Kesha. For those who don't know, Kesha was Beelzebub in Helluva Boss. During the time, she was in a financial crisis and lucky for Viv, she was obsessed with Kesha and due to the crisis, was taken control of. Both Andrew and Kesha were also typecasted for superficial roles that don't reflect who they truly are. Kesha being seen as the mean white party girl and Andrew being seen as the stereotypical gay man. It's like if I, a pansexual woman, was casted as an "It's a hole it's a goal" character. I wish the best for them and I hope they do well moving on.
Best regards, Matcha
Here are the posts I found on the Angel Dust and James cases:
💬 4 🔁 21 ❤️ 184 · Let's be real here. · If Angel Dust "wasn't meant" to be a gay stereotype... Why is it that Vivziepop only made him obs
💬 5 🔁 28 ❤️ 110 · Hello. I just came across a YouTube video of Andrew Rannells talking about Pokémon Live! and how he felt while doing it,
ғʀᴀɴᴋ ғʀᴀᴢᴇᴛᴛᴀ 1952
Me when I accidentally prove the stereotypes right AGAIN by accessorizing a bit lmao
So I did see Uncle Walt
So yeah! I did see Uncle Walt and it felt like a 60s YTP mixed with Newgrounds Flash Animation.
But there are also a lot of racist streotypes and content that made me realize that I really only like the Disney's Renaissance and Post Renaissance movies for the most part because they are far less racist than the older works(Post-Renaissance especially since there was more of a focus on BIPOC characters getting more positive uplifting roles(Especially Native Americans and Hawaiians) even if the voice actors aren't of that race most of the time sadly).
I also think the Ren and Stimpy episode where Stimpy makes an animated short with the moral of "Don't meet your heroes" might be inspired by this film.
Still crazy this film predicted internet culture without the internet.
*** This ask has been edited and condensed for clarity and context.
Anonymous asked: I have 3 Asian characters in the main friend group of my story. One is mixed race (Indian and Dominican), one is Chinese (comes from a Cantonese-speaking family), and the last one is a Japanese critique on Tumblr coquettes and the effects of of toxic internet communities on teenage girls. I'm kind of concerned about my South Asian character coming from a low income household, but I'm worried that my Japanese character might embody some traits that fit into stereotypes about Asian girls being rude and unhinged, especially because I explore a lot of complex and taboo subjects with her character. I do have sensitivity readers and was told (by an Asian person) that the character is a a breath of fresh air because she defies a lot of expectations placed on Japanese girls, but is there something else I should do as well? Could this be an offensive portrayal of a Japanese-American girl with a mental illness?
I'm not Japanese-American, so I am not the best person to tell you whether or not this could be an offensive portrayal of a Japanese-American person. What I can tell you is when it comes to writing about race-based and cultural-based experiences (like racism, diaspora, and being raised by immigrant parents), and exploring sensitive topics (like mental illness, addiction, sexuality, and violence) through a racial and/or cultural lens, if you are not yourself of that race or culture, you have to ask yourself whether you're the best person to tell these characters' stories.
We do need more diversity in fiction, and not only does that mean boosting "own voices" writers, it means making an effort to create casts of characters that are reflective of the world around us. However, there's a big difference between including diverse characters in your cast versus presuming to explore the experiences of race, culture, ability, and identity from the outside, having never had that experience yourself.
And yes, as writers, a big part of what we do is write about things we haven't or can't experience. Andy Weir has never been to Mars. Stephenie Meyer has never been a vampire. Leigh Bardugo wasn't born able to manipulate the elements. But, what all of these things have in common is they're things either no one can experience or anyone could experience. They're not something you could only experience only based on your race, culture, ability, or identity.
There are those who deeply feel you should not write about racial, cultural, ability-based, or identity-based experiences you have not yourself experienced, even if you do a lot of research and use sensitivity readers. And there are those who deeply feel all writers should be able to write about anything they want, no matter what. I can't tell you where you should fall in that, but I can offer advice, which is this: if you choose to portray racial, cultural, ability-based, or identity-based experiences that you have not had and could not have because you're not of that race, culture, ability, or identity--even if you do a ton of research and use lots of sensitivity readers, you have to be prepared to be heavily criticized by people who don't feel you had the right to write about these things coming from outside the experience.
And most of all, if your gut instinct is telling you you're doing something potentially offensive and/or harmful, you absolutely are. Listen to your gut and reconsider why you're even writing this in the first place. Far too often, it's coming from a place of fetishism rather than a unique desire to tell a story that has yet to be told.
So, just some things to consider. At the very least, continue to do a ton of research and make sure to work with multiple professional sensitivity readers from the backgrounds you're choosing to portray.
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
I’ve been writing seriously for over 30 years and love to share what I’ve learned. Have a writing question? My inbox is always open!
Learn more about WQA
Visit my Master List of Top Posts
Go to ko-fi.com/wqa to buy me coffee or see my commissions
I know I've said this before but studying Dracula in English lit at the same time as it's big on Tumblr is so funny
I end up writing this (please note that it's very context specific, I'm talking about a comparison to staking Lucy here, alongside fears of the time):
"staking Drac can be read as an analogy of society getting rid of gay men so they can't turn their women into groomers/ getting rid of foreigners/getting rid of Jews so we can't turn women into a blood sacrificing savage"
Next to:
"you plunge a stake into his heart? Kind of gay bro"