#user:ponyo

[wikipediacorruptedwardfitzg-blog]

User:Tenebre stands accused of trying to erase John B. Poindexter from mention on Wikipedia & of any association with Antonin Scalia - enhanced as he intentionally misspells "John P Poindexter", while claiming Poindexter's unimportant. It's quite obvious when looking at the history of wiki pages of Antonin Scalia & John B. Poindexter that User:Tenebre has been trying to do just that. But more problematic is that he is clearly backed by admins Bbb23 & Ponyo, who have continually shown that they are ready to abuse their authority. Bbb23 deleted the sentence mentioning John B. Poindexter, claiming the sentence "made his head hurt", while refusing to comment on more grammatically sound revisions. Ponyo very rapidly deleted a query he was not tagged in & then proceeded to ip ban all of t-mobile for 48 hours (t-mobile generates a new ip every time data is turned off & on), when it was pointed out that he deleted the note that Tenebre could be a Bbb23 sockpuppet within 2 minutes of its posting (obviously not investigated). It is time that Wikipedia strip Ponyo & Bbb23 of privileges since both do more harm than good.

[wikipediacorruptedwardfitzg-blog]

Today I was banned from “Cool Freaks’ Wikipedia Club” because the chief goal of all wikimedia/wikipedia related media is to laugh at inane subjects while pretending that those who run wikipedia are not intentionally withholding relevant information (ie about Cooper Union’s financial mismanagement or the 2012 Aurora Shooting ) whenever possible.

On a subthread about someone needlessly vandalizing the page of celebrity ray romano, "Wilbert Schuurman Hess” started a sensible topic wondering since it is not really an important (or interesting) topic, does it need to be reposted a 2nd time? My post to the thread is above.

A very very fast typing “play dumb” account by “Alyson Cruise” claimed very very rapidfire ignorance. My last reply was in response to her saying “I would like to hear an explanation as to why this type of content shouldn’t be posted”, and I explained how User:Beyond My Ken’s posts: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_Union_financial_crisis_and_tuition_protests&action=history in which he directly contradicts himself (by twice insisting on deletion & then copying the vast majority of what he deleted) is a much more salient topic to be discussed throughout wikipedia.

My post here I screencapped. The explanation, which was even more grounded and articulate was quickly deleted as I was banned (”Tyne C Uzo” said ‘good bye’ after i called this user out for posting 5 inane comments in an attempt to bury my posts).  Very odd that the more money and resources Wikimedia gets, the more people are banned for reasons that make little to no sense either from the site itself or satellite sites (such as “Cool Freaks Wikipedia Club” facebook group or, in my case, with over a 1 month ban from Linkedin for commenting on wikimedia’s linkedin posts).

Board Chairman Patricio Lorente has absolutely no shame.

[wikipediacorruptedwardfitzg-blog]

With new media, mainstream narratives need constant attention. So people such as Edward Fitzgerald are called upon more and more often to censor wikipedia to appease the narrative pushing overlords. In the case of 2012 Aurora Shooting, User:DisuseKid deleted all mentions of the many people who questioned Dan Oates and James Yacone's narrative https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012_Aurora_shooting&diff=670138428&oldid=669998051 "established" User:VQuakr then appeared to suggest that anything other than the mainstream narrative is loony and also to delete an extensive talk page section with reasons being WP:Deny (you're a vandal), WP:Fringe (you're talking about a controversial subject) and TW (I am a registered user so I can do whatever I want) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2012_Aurora_shooting&diff=674187508&oldid=674186276 fast forward to Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. User:Beyond My Ken, whose talk page proudly proclaims "ignore all rules", deleted a legitimate warning from his profile https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=679508698&oldid=679508282 and again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=679514495&oldid=prev and again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=679650678&oldid=679615624 while VQuakr resurfaces to do sketchy things like blanking a user's profile https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ferociouslettuce&diff=680422428&oldid=680419301 and erasing their attempts to talk on their own talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ferociouslettuce&diff=680494865&oldid=680493073 Apparently the name Edward Fitzgerald strikes a nerve in User:Beyond My Ken and User:Ponyo has been very forthcoming with protecting him. There is a gray area as to which wikipediens are true vandals and which are jockeying for positions of greater prominence with Edward Fitzgerald. But it is definitely time for Edward Fitzgerald to be banned from Wikipedia. And if it requires knocking out Patricio Lorente and dragging wikipedia's current editing practices to do so, then so be it. Jimmy Wales is entitled to more than "a seat" ; he is entitled to "THE seat".