Nothing directly tying this user to Edward Fitzgerald, but an anonymous person banning all of T-Mobile because "anon . only" raises a lot of red flags. Similar to behaviours seen in Ponyo & Bbb23 ..
Phantogram Three
Cosmic Funnies
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Interview Vampire Daily
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
The Bowery Presents

izzy's playlists!

blake kathryn
Fai_Ryy
tumblr dot com
NASA

#extradirty
hello vonnie
$LAYYYTER
official daine visual archive
untitled
YOU ARE THE REASON

Jimmy Eat World
𓃗
RMH

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Georgia
seen from Poland
seen from Czechia

seen from Chile
seen from Indonesia

seen from Indonesia

seen from Venezuela
seen from Jordan
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from Thailand
seen from Brazil
seen from Colombia

seen from Japan

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
@wikipediacorruptedwardfitzg-blog
Nothing directly tying this user to Edward Fitzgerald, but an anonymous person banning all of T-Mobile because "anon . only" raises a lot of red flags. Similar to behaviours seen in Ponyo & Bbb23 ..
User:Tenebre stands accused of trying to erase John B. Poindexter from mention on Wikipedia & of any association with Antonin Scalia - enhanced as he intentionally misspells "John P Poindexter", while claiming Poindexter's unimportant. It's quite obvious when looking at the history of wiki pages of Antonin Scalia & John B. Poindexter that User:Tenebre has been trying to do just that. But more problematic is that he is clearly backed by admins Bbb23 & Ponyo, who have continually shown that they are ready to abuse their authority. Bbb23 deleted the sentence mentioning John B. Poindexter, claiming the sentence "made his head hurt", while refusing to comment on more grammatically sound revisions. Ponyo very rapidly deleted a query he was not tagged in & then proceeded to ip ban all of t-mobile for 48 hours (t-mobile generates a new ip every time data is turned off & on), when it was pointed out that he deleted the note that Tenebre could be a Bbb23 sockpuppet within 2 minutes of its posting (obviously not investigated). It is time that Wikipedia strip Ponyo & Bbb23 of privileges since both do more harm than good.
Edward Fitzgerald has once again censored the truth on Wikipedia and banned a t-mobile ip for pointing out that he responded instantaneously (despite not being tagged) to a very valid accusation that Tenebre appears to be a sockpuppet of Bbb23. Bbb23 essentially confirms that he is Tenebre's sockpuppet in the "joke" above. As you can see from Antonin Scalia's talk page, a detailed discussion including John B. Poindexter is underway.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antonin_Scalia yet the article's edit history involves consistent deletion of this by Tenebre https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antonin_Scalia&action=history Edward Fitzgerald (as User:Tenebre) has also tried (& failed) to convince all that John B Poindexter's page should be deleted.. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_B._Poindexter&action=history Edward Fitzgerald is losing his touch. He is very much in danger of losing his sockpuppets because this is way too blatant
Today I was banned from “Cool Freaks’ Wikipedia Club” because the chief goal of all wikimedia/wikipedia related media is to laugh at inane subjects while pretending that those who run wikipedia are not intentionally withholding relevant information (ie about Cooper Union’s financial mismanagement or the 2012 Aurora Shooting ) whenever possible.
On a subthread about someone needlessly vandalizing the page of celebrity ray romano, "Wilbert Schuurman Hess” started a sensible topic wondering since it is not really an important (or interesting) topic, does it need to be reposted a 2nd time? My post to the thread is above.
A very very fast typing “play dumb” account by “Alyson Cruise” claimed very very rapidfire ignorance. My last reply was in response to her saying “I would like to hear an explanation as to why this type of content shouldn’t be posted”, and I explained how User:Beyond My Ken’s posts: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_Union_financial_crisis_and_tuition_protests&action=history in which he directly contradicts himself (by twice insisting on deletion & then copying the vast majority of what he deleted) is a much more salient topic to be discussed throughout wikipedia.
My post here I screencapped. The explanation, which was even more grounded and articulate was quickly deleted as I was banned (”Tyne C Uzo” said ‘good bye’ after i called this user out for posting 5 inane comments in an attempt to bury my posts). Very odd that the more money and resources Wikimedia gets, the more people are banned for reasons that make little to no sense either from the site itself or satellite sites (such as “Cool Freaks Wikipedia Club” facebook group or, in my case, with over a 1 month ban from Linkedin for commenting on wikimedia’s linkedin posts).
Board Chairman Patricio Lorente has absolutely no shame.
OK. Over 2 months ago, I insisted that one wikipedia user (jm3) was correct to say there was more than "possible financial mismanagement" at Cooper Union & that wsj/nyt are more notable than a diverseeducation.com article which offered little substance. Clueless about the real issues at Cooper Union, Beyond My Ken incomprehensively replied many times before it became incredibly obvious that he was a sockpuppet of Ponyo & possibly Bbb23 as admins fell in line behind the vindictive, libelous checkuser/oversight admins to preserve their title and ban Ferociouslettuce for "personal attacks".. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ferociouslettuce (several posts were repressed, a function that admins do not need & is primarily used to cover their own asses) By not banning Bbb23 & ponyo, the wikipedia / wikimedia board are in the awkward position of being supporters of high ranking admins who actively ensure the truth is not printed. Am I the only one who's been censored by Ponyo from printing truth? Nope. Here's a more obvious case: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Nightly_Show_with_Larry_Wilmore_episodes_(2015)&diff=679369852&oldid=679369127 User:Nymf insisted on deleting all episode descriptions for a show. User:Nymf, a likely sockpuppet of User:Ponyo, was not reprimanded. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Nightly_Show_with_Larry_Wilmore_episodes_(2015)&diff=prev&oldid=679365806 User:166.170.48.58, whose edits were erased by Nymf, was prohibited from editing the article by User:Ponyo https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Nightly_Show_with_Larry_Wilmore_episodes_(2015)&diff=682154377&oldid=679369852 Today that article has specific suggestions for edits (revert to User:166.170.48.58 version), despite User:Ponyo prohibiting this user from editing. Wikimedia Board Members are sitting in their ivory towers, feigning ignorance. Meanwhile wikimedia foundation $ are pouring in. If Costco found out one of their high ranking admins was actively endangering their brand, would their board claim they are powerless to stop them? The database at wikipedia is rather impressive. The bulk of free editors on the site make it a wealth of information. But the site cannot continue to back up stories that don't make sense (Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests , 2012 Aurora Shooting , ..) if they want to remain the most relevant encyclopedia on the web.
Too Obvious. Edward Fitzgerald
I was looking up episodes of “The Nightly Show With Larry Wilmore” on wikipedia and realized the list of episodes is outdated.
Being the good wikipedien that I am, I intended to update the article. However, it has been protected. And the page is protected by none other than User:Ponyo.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Nightly_Show_with_Larry_Wilmore_episodes_(2015)&action=history
Yet strangely, a few weeks ago, many of the old episodes were added to wikipedia before being deleted inexplicably.. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Nightly_Show_with_Larry_Wilmore_episodes_(2015)&oldid=679365806
and then the article became “protected” because of “persistent sock puppetry”.
I was not the ip address that made these objectively (and evidently) beneficial edits, but a blind man could see that the way this article is treated by Ponyo and probable sockpuppet Nymf, who erased the work of people who added relevant descriptions to the article, is disruptive.
Harper Camp is a downright embarassment. I was quickly blocked from his page again. He really doesn't like being reminded that the $15B/yr surplus he inherited turned into $126B in debt for Canadians..
Unfortunately, I did not screencap all of my salient points before I was blocked and my points were deleted. But needless to say, I am significantly better at arguing that Stephen Harper should no longer be Prime Minister of Canada than stephen Harper and all his paid cronies are at arguing stephen harper should be the Canadian prime minister.
With new media, mainstream narratives need constant attention. So people such as Edward Fitzgerald are called upon more and more often to censor wikipedia to appease the narrative pushing overlords. In the case of 2012 Aurora Shooting, User:DisuseKid deleted all mentions of the many people who questioned Dan Oates and James Yacone's narrative https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012_Aurora_shooting&diff=670138428&oldid=669998051 "established" User:VQuakr then appeared to suggest that anything other than the mainstream narrative is loony and also to delete an extensive talk page section with reasons being WP:Deny (you're a vandal), WP:Fringe (you're talking about a controversial subject) and TW (I am a registered user so I can do whatever I want) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2012_Aurora_shooting&diff=674187508&oldid=674186276 fast forward to Cooper Union financial crisis and tuition protests. User:Beyond My Ken, whose talk page proudly proclaims "ignore all rules", deleted a legitimate warning from his profile https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=679508698&oldid=679508282 and again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=679514495&oldid=prev and again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=679650678&oldid=679615624 while VQuakr resurfaces to do sketchy things like blanking a user's profile https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ferociouslettuce&diff=680422428&oldid=680419301 and erasing their attempts to talk on their own talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ferociouslettuce&diff=680494865&oldid=680493073 Apparently the name Edward Fitzgerald strikes a nerve in User:Beyond My Ken and User:Ponyo has been very forthcoming with protecting him. There is a gray area as to which wikipediens are true vandals and which are jockeying for positions of greater prominence with Edward Fitzgerald. But it is definitely time for Edward Fitzgerald to be banned from Wikipedia. And if it requires knocking out Patricio Lorente and dragging wikipedia's current editing practices to do so, then so be it. Jimmy Wales is entitled to more than "a seat" ; he is entitled to "THE seat".