Today I was banned from “Cool Freaks’ Wikipedia Club” because the chief goal of all wikimedia/wikipedia related media is to laugh at inane subjects while pretending that those who run wikipedia are not intentionally withholding relevant information (ie about Cooper Union’s financial mismanagement or the 2012 Aurora Shooting ) whenever possible.
On a subthread about someone needlessly vandalizing the page of celebrity ray romano, "Wilbert Schuurman Hess” started a sensible topic wondering since it is not really an important (or interesting) topic, does it need to be reposted a 2nd time? My post to the thread is above.
A very very fast typing “play dumb” account by “Alyson Cruise” claimed very very rapidfire ignorance. My last reply was in response to her saying “I would like to hear an explanation as to why this type of content shouldn’t be posted”, and I explained how User:Beyond My Ken’s posts: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooper_Union_financial_crisis_and_tuition_protests&action=history in which he directly contradicts himself (by twice insisting on deletion & then copying the vast majority of what he deleted) is a much more salient topic to be discussed throughout wikipedia.
My post here I screencapped. The explanation, which was even more grounded and articulate was quickly deleted as I was banned (”Tyne C Uzo” said ‘good bye’ after i called this user out for posting 5 inane comments in an attempt to bury my posts). Very odd that the more money and resources Wikimedia gets, the more people are banned for reasons that make little to no sense either from the site itself or satellite sites (such as “Cool Freaks Wikipedia Club” facebook group or, in my case, with over a 1 month ban from Linkedin for commenting on wikimedia’s linkedin posts).
Board Chairman Patricio Lorente has absolutely no shame.