Speaking from my own experiences as a chronically online media analyst who writes auDHD-fueled diatribes about my favorite (and most hated) media on Tumblr and reddit - if you want to get better at media analysis, whether it be literary or artistic or a combination of both, then it's not just a matter of watching and consuming other peoples' analyses of media, but learning how to distinguish between tangible objective analysis, and reactionary critique.
I think a large part of the "literary analysis is dying" argument is both rooted in and suffers from the fact that many people exclusively watch clickbait rants on Youtube about why a certain piece of media sucks or how its creator is a Terrible Person Actually™️, and they don't understand that that's not actual analysis, it's just reaction. That's not to say these videos don't have value in their own way (I myself often jump between reactionary critique and tangible objective analysis, based on whatever I'm feeling that day lol) but they're often just skimming the surface and not really getting into the art itself. They often start and end with "I like/dislike this work because xyz". They're designed to keep your attention, with snappy editing, quirky copyright-free music, and loud simplified language, while offering little else outside of what you could find in your bog standard reddit post.
And ironically, these "analysis" videos aren't even treated like their own pieces of art, rather just settling for a baseline template that follows the same "optimized for the algorithm" formula and structure, without any unique writing or editing to show for themselves. So ironically, the people who make these kinds of videos can't even lead by example themselves.
But if you want actual analysis, you need to find the videos that are quiet, thoughtful, patient, and intentional. Find the video essays that actually talk about the techniques used to create the work, the visionaries behind it, the influences it drew from, the era and culture that compelled it to exist in the first place. Find the video essays that actually treat themselves like their own work of art, an extension of the art they're analyzing, demonstrating the techniques and philosophies they're trying to teach you about.
While subjective opinion is still an aspect - it would be impossible to exclude it entirely - you'll find you'll learn a lot more about the craft of storytelling and media, and subsequently get better at analyzing that craft, just from watching someone talk about how the directors created a certain shot in a film from 30 years ago, or about their editing process and where they would choose to let scenes sit and linger and other scenes cut prematurely.
And if you feel like this post is talking to you specifically or if you're actively trying to get better at media analysis but have no idea where to start or what kind of analysis content I'm talking about, here are some of my own recommendations:
Taylor & Tony are gone again! Thanks for watching!
We returned in late 2024 for a limited series featuring brand new video essays, followed
CinemaStix is a series of filmmaking stories & video essays, with a focus on popular & classic movies.
Hey, I’m Danny Boyd! CinemaStix is
Talking about video games, history, politics, empathy, and more — typically at the same time, always unpredictably. For more info, visit my
I talk about music. A lot.