#violent fantasy

[iron-shrike]

Until We Meet Again (Shin Hati/Sabine Wren)

Dipping my toe into writing Star Wars fic, inspired by these two aggressive maniacs. Hope you enjoy

An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works

[sissycensorslut]

Sometimes I feel like begging my mommy to let me hug her and hump her legs and kiss me so deep that I can't breathe, but I don't want to be a bother to her, I love her so much, maybe I should start messaging other mommy's so she has to break all my fingers then nurse me back to health, mommy's undivided attention would make the pain all worth it, she would paint my nails while applying just a little too much pressure, or unlock me and tell me to rub my little clit to a ruin or I don't get to cum for a month. She could do anything and I wouldn't be able to fight back, not that I'd want to of course ❤️

[brokenorbornthatway]

I want you to know that you’re kicking ass even though everything is hard. Keep doing what you’re doing and remember to say no to murder. I don’t think your wife would want to visit you in prison. (Though I bet she would.)

Due to wanting and deserving to live a long and happy life with my wife, I will always say no to murder. Even when I desperately want to rip our birth giver's skin off her body and feed it to her. Thank you for the kindness and support, dear.

[omymadness]

∙∙·▫▫ᵒᴼᵒ▫ₒₒ▫ᵒᴼᵒ▫ₒₒ▫ᵒᴼᵒ Violent Fantasies ᵒᴼᵒ▫ₒₒ▫ᵒᴼᵒ▫ₒₒ▫ᵒᴼᵒ▫▫·∙∙

💀🔪💕

[bluewatsons]

Abstract:

Predictability of dangerousness in association with mental disorders remains elusive, outside of a few relatively well-established risk factors for the prognostication of violence, such as male sex, the presence of a psychotic disorder, and comorbid substance abuse. In clinical practice, inquiry into the presence of aggressive or violent ideation, in the form of ideas of homicide or suicide, is part of a standard mental status examination. Nonetheless, fantasy life, when it concerns harm toward others, may not be as reliable an indicator of imminent danger as it may be in the case of self-harm. Five cases of young Italian men with Asperger syndrome and recurrent and extremely violent femicide fantasies are presented. While there is no direct correlation between autism spectrum conditions and violence, as other humans, persons with an autistic condition are capable of committing crimes, including homicide. All five had in common a number of characteristics and behaviors felt to be pathoplastic: All had been bullied, all had been romantically rejected, all were long-standing First Person Shooter (FPS) game players, and all were avid violent pornography consumers. The potential for an actual neurocognitive impact of violent video games, well documented in the literature, and its combination with personal life history and chronic habituation following long-standing violent pornography use is discussed in the context of social and emotional vulnerabilities. While aggressive fantasies cannot and should not be underestimated, in countries where duty to protect legislation does not exist, a clinical approach is imperative, as, incidentally, should be anywhere.

[robin-hood-for-freedom]

I dont expect anybody who isnt involved in the liberty movement to know who this guy is, but I’m sure to those who are, I’m sure Stephan Molyneux  needs no introduction.  

This video I embeded, although old, is really the main thing that led to me no longer caring much what he has to say.  Thats why I thought i’d give my own thoughts, and the specific problems I have with it.  Problems that, frankly, are typical of Stephan’s style of thinking and argumentation.  

First, I’m going to discuss his specific interpretations of Harry Potter or Star Wars.  The former because I’m not a huge fan of HP, I’v read the books and seen the movies, but dont really have the in depth knowledge needed to refute the specific points he brings up.  Although friends and family of mine who are Potter fans tell me Stephan’s interpretations(or technically his listener’s, which Stephan is clearly and unambiguously endorsing) are rather strained and bizarre.  And while I am a Star Wars fan, his interpretations are simply beyond refuting.  All I’m going to say is that the fact that Stephan sees Chewbacca, a nine foot tall monster made of pure muscle, as a ‘walking vagina,’ that says a lot more about Stephan than it does about George Lucas.  

What I want to discuss, however are some of the broader ideas he touched on.  First of all, while Stephan never explicitly says this, he does give the implication that stories involving fantasy violence is something relatively modern and culturally unique.  But this is not only untrue, its so blatantly false, I cant believe anybody can take the idea seriously.  Violent fantasies have been with us since The Epic of Gilgamesh(aka. the oldest story known).  And can be found in quite literally every human culture known, including ones as distant and distinct as the ancient Greeks, Chinese and Maya.  In fact, up until a couple hundred years ago, violent fantasy stories seem to be the dominate type of story that we told(and one might argue that it still is…).  I’ll go so far to say that it seem like, for some reason, creating and enjoying stories with violence and fantastic elements is something innately and uniquely human.  Why that is, I’m not sure, but it should give pause to Stephan’s assertion that enjoyment of violent fantasy is an aberration from the norm, rather than something profoundly human.  

On that note, I want to talk about this idea of ‘geek’ or ‘nerd.’ This central to his thesis: Stephan asserts, with no evidence(other than perhaps some badly outdated stereotypes), that its mostly these ‘losers’ who enjoy violent fantasy.  I literally cant fathom how anybody with open eyes can think.  I mean everything you could point to suggests that fantasy is massively popular: the fact that video games(an industry built on fantasy violence) out sells pretty much every other industry, the popularity of shows like The Walking Dead, Game of Thrones, and Supernatural, hell even the ‘gold standard’ by which we judge what is popular, Hollywood box office receipts.  In 2012, 8 of the top 10 grossing films were violent fantasy films, and Skyfall only misses this mark because its not ‘technically’ fantasy(although much of what James Bond does is just as fantastic as Thor).  2013 is slightly better if only because there is more sci-fi(which in a follow up vid, Stephan equates to fantasy), Gravity, and Fast and Furious 6.  2014 already has Amazing Spiderman 2, Noah, and Divergent(also Captain America: Winter Soldier, although one could dispute its placement), and we’ve only seen the first wave of ‘summer blockbusters’(which tend to be the most likely to fall into violent fantasy) and havent yet gotten the new Hobbit movie.  So, if Stephan is right, and its most ‘geeks, dorks, nerds,’ etc who enjoy violent fantasy, then they must be driving this trend.  But if so, where is the evidence of that?  And if they are driving pretty much all of current pop culture, then can they really be called ‘geeks, dorks,’ or whatever?  After ‘geeks and nerds’ are by definition(and certainly the way Stephan uses the words), the minority, the outsiders, those who are not popular.  

In fact Stephan contradicts himself on this very point.  He begins his video by saying he wants to explore why ‘mega hits’ like Harry Potter and Star Wars appear, but then later asserts(again without evidence) that its mostly ‘geeks, dorks, nerds, losers’ enjoying these things.  So which is it?  Are Harry Potter and Star Wars ‘mega hits?’  Or are they only(mostly) enjoyed by ‘geeks?’  

Thats not to say there arent things that are considered ‘geeky,’ but it has more to do with form that substance:  D&D, comics, Warhammer, many fantasy novels, etc.  I think there is a reason that the ‘nerdy’ among us are attracted to these things, but it has nothing to do with being abused or even with the content.  I may do a post on this later, but for now, I’ll just say that, until Stephan gives some real evidence that its the only the geeky who enjoy violent fantasy, he’s full of shit, at least as far as this is concerned.