May 11
Without Title
Bridget Bate Tichenor
oil on Masonite, ca. 1960
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Burkina Faso
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
Without Title
Bridget Bate Tichenor
oil on Masonite, ca. 1960
Alexander Rothaug “Ohne Titel (Without title)” Mythologische Szene (Mythological scene)
you know how Mark Lee is so soft? but also really powerful and rude and savage? And then he giggles and then he raps with the strongest voice and then he dances with all his power and then he looks so smol and the next second he could crush the whole world and he is swag and flowers and nothing can stop him except for his members' kisses, except for when he strokes their hands and throws himself on them in laughter and then he is a prince and then he is a street rapper and then he is a gentleman and he gets so nervous but he is so confident and his face is soft and squishy but his cheekbones are blades and his jaw cuts glass and his eyes sparkle so warmly and he is everything and so so so beautiful
TOUJOURS PLUS DE MOINS. En art, “sans-titre” est le titre le plus couramment utilisé.
http://adieu-et-a-demain.fr
Without Title
Hello fellas, How are you today? I hope you are enjoying your study, love and life!
Ok, actually, Today I am 21 years old. Not older surely, because age is just about a number.
In my 21, I really have many plans, and I hope I am still in my high ambition degree, haha. In this year, which I called ‘Hey a great year, 2017”, I have list many dreams which I hope I can meet, Aamiin. And fortunately, One of my dreams list I reached today, that is to become A Delegate J
5th February, 2017 is the announcment date of the competition which I am joining, the name of the Competition is MIST. I think I have told you about what it is MIST, but I can’t make sure it, lol. In short, I become a delegate in MIST, and I really hope I can win this competition, that I can reach one of my dream list again, that is to become a WINNER. Aamiin Yaa AllahJ
In this year also, I plan to take the Internship, and I have several list of company that I interested. Btw, I’ve just watched the Film with title, ‘The Internship’ few minutes ago. That film told about team work, spirit, collaboration and any other positive things. And that Film I think is very good, I got some insight from it. I hope, when I will take an internship program later, I can remember and apply what this film told. And through this film I can imagine how is the internship program look like, hehe.
Okay, maybe just these the things that I can share now, I hope for the next, I can write something that not boring, such as love, friendship, and story about education life actually.
See you, Guys!
Revenue entries – for collection of revenue – without title No revenue entry get presumption under Sec.6 of A.P.PATTADAR AND PASS BOOK ACT. In my opinion, the said provision provides that every entry in record of rights shall be presumed to be true until the contrary is proved. The facts and the findings set out above are sufficient to rebut the presumption, if any, in favour of the plaintiffs under Section 6 of the Act that the entries in the record of rights in their favour are correct. 29. Admittedly, the adangal for the year 1421 Fasli (2011) issued on 08-06-2012 shows the 1st defendant as the pattedar and possessor for entire Ac.22.27 gts. and in the pahani for 1422 Fasli, 2nd defendant is shown as the pattedar and possessor to the extent of Ac.11.13 cts. and 1st defendant is shown to be the pattedar and possessor of Ac.11.13 1/2 cts. So on the date of suit, prima facie they are in possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The defendants had questioned the grant of pattedar passbooks to the plaintiffs in an appeal before the R.D.O., Adoni but the same was rejected directing them to approach the Civil Court. Therefore the defendants cannot be found fault with for not availing the alternative remedy of appeal under Section 5B of the Act. It is settled law that entries in revenue record are not proof of title [see (Thakur) Nirman Singh and Others Vs. Thakur Lal Rudra Partab Narain Singh and Others4]. Such entries facilitate collection of revenue. That is why there is no conclusive presumption provided in Section 6 of the Act. It is unfortunate that provisions like Section 5A of the Act are being misused by litigants in collusion with revenue authorities, unsettling settled title in favour of the actual owners. This case is a classic illustration of this phenomenon. 32. The conduct of the plaintiffs in suppressing (i) the regd. gift deed dt.12.5.1956 in favour of 1st defendant by Chittam Ramaswamy, (ii) the unregistered relinquishment deed by 1st defendant in favour of Venkanna Setty and (iii) the sale deed allegedly executed by him in favour of Padmavathamma, also disentitle them to grant of the equitable relief of injunction, as they have not come to the court with clean hands. 33. Since the plaintiffs are found not to have prima facie title, even assuming for the sake of argument without conceding that they are in possession of the land, grant of injunction in their favour would amount to granting an injunction against the lawful owner. This is not permissible in law. (See Hanumanthappa v. Muninarayanappa5) 34. For all the above reasons, I am hold that the orders passed by the court below are unsustainable. The court below unfortunately did not consider the matter in the above manner and it gave more importance to the entries in the revenue records produced by the plaintiffs and rejected those produced by the defendants ignoring the principles of law governing transfer of title referred to supra.
Revenue entries – for collection of revenue – without title No revenue entry get presumption under Sec.6 of A.P.PATTADAR AND PASS BOOK ACT. In my opinion, the said provision provides that every entry in record of rights shall be presumed to be true until the contrary is proved. The facts and the findings set out above are sufficient to rebut the presumption, if any, in favour of the plaintiffs under Section 6 of the Act that the entries in the record of rights in their favour are correct. 29. Admittedly, the adangal for the year 1421 Fasli (2011) issued on 08-06-2012 shows the 1st defendant as the pattedar and possessor for entire Ac.22.27 gts. and in the pahani for 1422 Fasli, 2nd defendant is shown as the pattedar and possessor to the extent of Ac.11.13 cts. and 1st defendant is shown to be the pattedar and possessor of Ac.11.13 1/2 cts. So on the date of suit, prima facie they are in possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The defendants had questioned the grant of pattedar passbooks to the plaintiffs in an appeal before the R.D.O., Adoni but the same was rejected directing them to approach the Civil Court. Therefore the defendants cannot be found fault with for not availing the alternative remedy of appeal under Section 5B of the Act. It is settled law that entries in revenue record are not proof of title [see (Thakur) Nirman Singh and Others Vs. Thakur Lal Rudra Partab Narain Singh and Others4]. Such entries facilitate collection of revenue. That is why there is no conclusive presumption provided in Section 6 of the Act. It is unfortunate that provisions like Section 5A of the Act are being misused by litigants in collusion with revenue authorities, unsettling settled title in favour of the actual owners. This case is a classic illustration of this phenomenon. 32. The conduct of the plaintiffs in suppressing (i) the regd. gift deed dt.12.5.1956 in favour of 1st defendant by Chittam Ramaswamy, (ii) the unregistered relinquishment deed by 1st defendant in favour of Venkanna Setty and (iii) the sale deed allegedly executed by him in favour of Padmavathamma, also disentitle them to grant of the equitable relief of injunction, as they have not come to the court with clean hands. 33. Since the plaintiffs are found not to have prima facie title, even assuming for the sake of argument without conceding that they are in possession of the land, grant of injunction in their favour would amount to granting an injunction against the lawful owner. This is not permissible in law. (See Hanumanthappa v. Muninarayanappa5) 34. For all the above reasons, I am hold that the orders passed by the court below are unsustainable. The court below unfortunately did not consider the matter in the above manner and it gave more importance to the entries in the revenue records produced by the plaintiffs and rejected those produced by the defendants ignoring the principles of law governing transfer of title referred to supra.
2013 http://judis.nic.in/Judis_Andhra/list_new2.asp?FileName=10574 P.Veerabhadrappa Setty ….Appellant -vs- Polliki Chandrahas…..Respondent in C.M.A.Nos.286 of 2013 AND BATCH
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.M.A.Nos.286 of 2013 AND BATCH 26-11-2013 P.Veerabhadrappa Setty ….Appellant Polliki Chandrahas…..Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sri T.S.Anand Counsel for the…
View On WordPress