In this space, Teaching Artist correspondents from around the U.S. and the world bring you stories of their work at the crossroads of art and learning. ALT/space is a project of the Teaching Artist Journal, a peer reviewed print and online quarterly that serves as a voice, forum and resource for teaching artists and all those working at the intersection of art and learning. Individual online subscriptions of the TAJ print journal gives you access to a very useful, easy to access, 55-issue archive--the only such archive of its kind.
When Product Meets Process | Annie Harrison Elliot
When teaching, I often feel caught between my love of the creative process and the desire for a polished end product. Both are important, but limited time frames to work with students is always challenging. I generally only have 45 minutes to an hour once or twice a week to work with a group of students.
On the one hand, my proclivity is to invest more heavily in the creative process by allowing plenty of time for students to explore their art form unencumbered. On the other hand, I personally feel there is a need for an end-product, which requires focus on performance technique, polishing, and other important tasks. Particularly with the performing arts, I believe if students are not getting a chance to actually âperformâ in front of an audience (big or small) they are not really learning the art form fully. Is it fair to cut out the âperformanceâ element in favor of process? I lean towards no. Recently, I was fortunate enough to experience a fantastic solution to the product vs. process problem.
The collaborative performing arts activity I experienced was developed by Christy Robinson, Director of Enrichment at The Childrenâs School in Atlanta, GA. I am currently working as a choreographer at The Childrenâs School and we were in the midst of working on the musical Thereâs a Monster in My Closet.
Production paused over winter break and, when we returned,, instead of rehearsing for the musical in the typical fashion, Christy devised a refresher/warm-up had the students work collaboratively and write a musical scene about what they did during their time away from school.Â
All of the adult teachers were in charge of a station that the children rotated through. For example, I was in charge of the choreography station, Talal and Jerrell, the drama teachers, were in charge of the scene station, Chief and Carina were in charge of music and lyrics, and Christy polished the final product. After each group performed their musical scene, the students had an opportunity to ask questions or share critiques.Â
I couldnât believe it! It was a process that addressed everything! The students developed the concept of the scene, wrote the scene, wrote the lyrics and came up with choreography. With our help, they were able to develop a final polished product. Not only did they have a blast doing this, but their technical skills improved as well. The students were projecting their voices more onstage, they were physically inhabiting a character at a more advanced level and as a whole making stronger theatrical choices. Even after we returned to rehearsing the actual musical I noticed that these new skills, which emerged over just a few days, had definitely transferred to the larger project.
The whole process took just two sessions to complete from start to finish. I learned so much from getting to be a part of this collaborative activity and it inspired me to examine my own âprocess to productâ philosophies and structures. I realized that if the artistic experience is structured correctly, there should be enough time to include everything. Unfortunately, I often work alone so collaboration with other teachers is often impossible. However, I did realize I could still utilize a modified version of the ârotating stationâ idea and I implemented it in several of my classes.Â
For example, for my dance class, I set up four cones marking the different stations, and each station had different sets of objects to explore. One had top hats, one had hula hoops, one had scarves, and one had rhythm sticks. Each station became its own different âworldâ for students to investigate using movement and props. Then we made a performance based on studentsâ movement discoveries at each station. The experience at The Childrenâs School reminded me that not only does the quality of the process matter, but the structure of the artistic experience itself also bears heavily on the outcome of the final product.
Annie Harrison Elliott is currently a teaching artist in Atlanta, GA and is the founder of Eyes on the Sky, Arts Learning. Through her organization, she teaches and implements programs in dance, drama, creative writing, and playwriting for children. Annie has a BA in Dance and Creative Writing from Franklin & Marshall College and a MA in Arts Education from New York University. As an actor, dancer, and playwright, she has been a teaching artist for Education in Dance and the Related Arts (NYC), The Fulton Theatre (PA), a guest artist for Franklin & Marshall College, and an acting and dance instructor in various studios throughout the United States. www.eyesontheskylearning.com
Also in ALT/space by Annie Harrison Elliott:
What Young Children Can Do
Breaking Down Barriers to Dance: A Multi-Disciplinary ApproachÂ
This semester I will have two courses with our freshman. Â Freshman year of college is always a difficult time but I think being a dance major makes it a little more challenging.Â
Most of these students have been the âstarsâ at whatever school they attended  before college and it is always a real eye opener to them to suddenly be in a class where they are more like equals to the other students. These students also have a different schedule than their peers in other majors. They take their dance and academic classes all day long and then spend the evenings in rehearsal. They have between 6-8 courses on their schedule while their peers may have four. Their âDanceâ classes also contain many writing and reading assignments. They donât get to just âdance all dayâ like their peers assume. When they are not working on all of this, they are cross training. They work at least as hard as the athletes but without the respect.
I am most excited to be working with the freshman in the dance conditioning class. Dance conditioning teaches students alternative techniques for training their body. The complimentary approaches of Pilates and Yoga, for example, help them with the alignment with their torso and pelvis and also with incorporating more breath in to their movement. This course also spends a good deal of time focusing on anatomy. For many of these students, it is their first look at the anatomy of the body and how that anatomy can influence their dance and their performance.
Dance conditioning makes visible just how much unlearning and relearning my freshman dancers need to do. Many of these students have come to us with bad alignment habits. As an instructor, there is a fine line to walk and a lot of trust that needs to built up with the students in order to begin to have them make changes to their alignment and the way that they have been training. Much of this work began when they arrived at school in the fall, but in this class we can really focus on it.Â
Studying anatomy helps this transition. As they learn about the shapes of the muscles and bones, they begin to truly understand why body parts move as they do. In one class, we were discussing the vertebral column. We were also talking about the anatomical terms for movement in the body, flexion in particular. I said to the students:
âFlexion of the vertebral column or spine is forward bending. In between each of the 24 vertebra is a joint- movement is possible there. Think of that the next time you are in modern dance class and asked to roll down in your spine. Are you using all 24 joints or just 3 or 4?â You could see the wheels turning as they pondered that thought. Itâs really a simple and obvious thought but if they are not aware how the body works they will be unable to dance to their fullest potential.
In the first few weeks of the class, the students float between being overwhelmed with names of muscles and other anatomical terms to wondering why no one ever talked about this before. I tell them that the same re-learning process that they are going through is happening in dance programs all over the country.
As the semester progresses and they begin to see and feel the changes that are happening in their body, their trust of the process grows. They start to notice that that hip does not pop any more, their turns are easier, their arabesque higher. At this point for many of the students, there is a renewed excitement about their dance training and what they can accomplish.Â
Angela M. Gallo is Artistic Director of Sapphire Moon Dance Company and Associate Professor of Dance at Coker College. Performance highlights include: the Edinburgh Fringe Festival in Scotland; Dance Theatre Workshop, White Wave Cool NY Festival, The Dancenow Downtown Festival, the Fringe Festival of Independent Artists (Toronto), the Piccolo Spoleto Festival and others. She has danced with numerous companies and has often been sought after as a guest choreographer and instructor. Angela holds an MFA in Dance from the University of Michigan and a BFA in Theater and Dance from Central Connecticut State University. Angelaâs work is influenced by her dance and somatic training. [email protected] | www.sapphiremoondance.org
Also by Angela M. Gallo in ALT/space:
This is Hard
Exploring the Line, Part 2
Exploring the Line, Part 1
In many classrooms sitting still and being quiet is the expectation but, to me, it is the death of a class. Certainly, there are times when I need my students to engage in listening behavior, but the key word here is âengageâ. Hearing is easy â listening takes engagement and practice.
Recently, I was teaching a storytelling unit to a class of third grade students. Each student had to retell a folktale in a minute. I needed to hear all their stories as a baseline. To try to keep them engaged as listeners, I gave them each a simple rubric to fill out; they were to tally how many storytellers they could hear, understand, smiled, etc. It quickly became apparent that these adorable children weren't listening to each other.
Some would randomly check boxes on the rubric, while others creatively doodled. Some started off with good intentions but, after the third or fourth storyteller, would start drifting off. And there were over 25 storytellers in each class! As it became increasingly apparent that these children had no idea how to engage a live audience, I shortened the time each child had for their initial presentation. I was there to teach these students the art of oral storytelling. I realized I couldn't do this without first working on listening skills.
I needed a plan. I had to get the students invested in each otherâs stories. I separated the class into groups of four or five. Each group had to learn all of their stories. The narrator for each story had to direct a set of three tableaux illustrating the beginning, middle and end of their folktale. All of the students in the group had to be involved in all the tableaux, even if they were part of the scenery.
During the residency, we worked on other aspects of storytelling and engaging an audience; the hook, character voices, projection and more. Rehearsals incorporated these new tools, while each group of students practiced engaged listening.
After the final presentations for parents and classmates, one of the classroom teachers shared with me how worried she was with the depth of the task I was asking her students to tackle. She bit her tongue at the time because we had worked together before and shared a lovely trust. She was amazed with the results. It enabled her to see how her students could collaborate, command attention, engage each other and really, really listen. Â
Elise May is a Teaching Artist who has performed and taught in the U.S., Canada, Bermuda and England. With degrees in Theatre and Communicative Disorders and Sciences, Elise has developed many educational programs using theater arts for vocal empowerment with mainstream, Special Education and ESL students. Creating interactive, multisensory programs with curricular and thematic connections allows Elise to work with school districts, libraries and corporations on performance, communications skills and community development. Her mission is for all to be heard, be understood and be confident. www.expressive-elocution.com
Conspiracy Theories at the âNormalâ School | Laura Reeder
Art and human development students at Massachusetts College of Art & Design (MassArt), 2013
When I am not on the road engaged in professional development with teachers and teaching artists, I am at a state-funded art school in Boston, Massachusetts working with graduate and undergraduate students who aspire to careers as artists who teach. Our program is called âArt Educationâ in alignment with traditional art school nomenclature. But, like many art schools, we have multiple pathways for preparing artists to apply their learning as teaching artists, art teachers, community artists, museum educators, artist-educators, engaged artists, artist/researcher/teachers, and artist-activists. There is no regular label for what they will be called when they leave our program. This broad menu of possibilities is intentional because our department encourages students to explore their options and define their work in an always changing world.
Yet, sometimes the students do not find these open-ended options to be helpful. Last semester, after an especially inventive series of workshops on teaching strategies where we studied literacy development[1] through playacting elements in a story, and we studied collaborative learning[2] through choreography and dance, some of my students expressed concern that these playful methods might be too weird to convince parents and administrators that this was effective teaching. This led to a conversation about their identities as artists who teach.
âThe TA takes on a variety of roles in leading a group, including facilitator of group process, as well as the roles of designer, leader, colleague, teacher, and witness. Good TAs are nimble in changing their role relationships to learners, enjoying each role, and modeling the multiplicity of roles that artistry requiresâ (Booth, 2012).
To them, it just sounded like more academic justification for the fuzziness and open-ended difficulties of the arts. Fortunately, we study at a school with some history in this area. So we turned to our own foundations for some insight.
Our college is Massachusetts College of Art & Design (aka MassArt). But, it was founded as the Massachusetts Normal Art School in 1873. Normal, at that time, indicated that this school would establish standards or norms for teaching art to working class students.
At the time it was an extraordinary organization, because it also proposed to teach not-so-normal folks to use artistic concepts in their everyday work and lives. It was not normal for working class, female, immigrant, or brown-skinned people to be included in the privilege of artistic activity. It was not normal for people who had little money or privilege and who had few choices about career paths to be invited into the exclusive world of art. But, even then, the students must have held similar questions about their future lives. Even then, they must have hoped that there was some guidebook or standard label for sharing their unique work with the real world.
Students at Massachusetts Normal Art School, circa 1890[3]
When I shared a photograph of Normal School students from 1890 engaged in some wacky airplane-angle-exercise it was impossible to ignore the similarities to the methods we were studying in our own class in 2013. My students were amused to imagine that it was some sort of not-so-normal conspiracy theory against standardization of teaching artist careers. Since the word conspiracy comes from the Latin conspirare which means âto breath [the spirit] togetherâ, it was completely fitting that they should be suspicious. Â
I really hoped that the teacher of that class did conspire with us, and that this was not a photo of a physical education class that was filed incorrectly in the archives. I imagined that teacher (daringly) saying: Letâs just do this thing together and figure out the important ideas from the combined spirit we are breathing today. Gratefully, it did the trick. My students expressed pride in coming from a legacy of resisting normalcy. While we had not solved any identity crises of teaching artistry, we did gain a greater degree of comfort with the truly unique practices that empowered us.
[1] Wootton, K., & Landay, E. (2012). A Reason to Read: Linking Literacy and the Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
[2] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[3] Courtesy of the University Archives & Special Collections Department, Joseph P. Healey Library, University of Massachusetts Boston:Â Boston State College photograph collection, ca. 1876-1975.
Booth, E. (2012). The universal elements of teaching artistry: takeaways from the worldâs first international teaching artist conference. Teaching Artist Journal blog, November 6, 2012: http://tajournal.com/2012/11/06/take-aways-from-the-worlds-first-international-teaching-artist-conference/ .
Laura Reeder is a teaching artist who interrogates systems of teaching, learning, and social justice through her artistic practice. She trains next generation teaching artists in the Art Education program at Massachusetts College of Art & Design (MassArt). She is completing research on Teaching Artistry as a Critical Community of Practice at Syracuse University and continues to advocate for social change through artistic work in national policy making. Laura keeps all of her passions alive by maintaining her teaching artistry in both Syracuse, NY and Boston, MA. Contact LauraÂ
Also by Laura Reeder in ALT/space:
Exquisite Corps(e)
The Opposite of Anesthetic
My dad, Jim Carlson, used to run the Arts in Corrections (AIC) program at New Folsom Prison (as highlighted in Michel Wenzerâs award-winning film, At Night I Fly). Since the remnants of AIC were finally cut out of the California state budget in 2009, Carlson has been working at the institution as a recreational therapist. This move to mental health services has fundamentally changed the physical space and materials he uses in his teaching practice. In response to the demands of the teaching contextâparticularly the interplay between mental illness and confinementâCarlson has new students explore drawing through a directed doodling process. The process of doodling provides students with the opportunity to learn about, and employ, the principle elements of art while eschewing some of the intimidating expectations associated with representation.Â
I do not often get to observe him teaching. Recently, however, I was meeting with an individual writer in the same room as one of Carlsonâs visual arts courses and overheard something that has been haunting me since. This particular class was for inmates in the psychiatric security unit (PSU) who have been removed, or âadministratively segregatedâ in prison bureau-speak, from the rest of the mental health services unit based on a serious infraction. PSU is, more or less, the Mental Heath Services version of âThe Hole.âÂ
Carlsonâs PSU class meets in a small, windowless rooms with eight phone booth sized cages crammed against three walls. The space has an unrelenting echo. It is difficult for inmates to see each other, and the plexi-glass spit-guard on the front of each booth, by design, distances participants from the teacher. Inmates come to class in a chain gang, hands cuffed at the small of their backs. They patiently wait their turn as, one by one, their feet and wrists are unshackled and they are locked into the booths. As they shuffle in, Carlson hands each artist a box of crayons and some print-making paper. When they need additional sheets, he slides them through the gap where the door of the cage does not quite meet its frame.
The night I was there, one particular artist came in loud, shouting at Carlson over the din of cuffs and rusty hinges, motioning him to take the stack of papers he had pressed to his body with his left elbow. Carlson had been gone for a few weeks and this artist was eager to update him on what had happened in his absence.Â
Artwork by M. Dement | Photo by Jim Carlson
On this night, Carlson walked from cage to cage, showing the other students how the artist has juxtaposed colors in a way that added energy to the drawing. The artist was pleased with his work and welcomed the praise. Then his voice lowered and he shook his head. He started to recall how he had given a stack of drawings to a different staff member while Carlson had been away. Now that person did not know where the drawings were.Â
âWe lost seven good mermaids,â he said in all seriousness.Â
I stopped what I was doing and looked at his face. I saw between the brindled beard and creased forehead, the effect of the loss. Those mermaids were real. Born between his mindâs eye and his drawing hand, onto a 6x6 inch canvas in a 6x9 foot concrete room. This artist had accepted Carlsonâs invitation to create, to make things come alive. And someoneâeither careless or cruelâhad taken the mermaids away, misunderstanding their value as more than brightly layered crayon on paper.
I have been thinking about the mermaids and what they mean for my own teaching practice. They remind me that when we invite artists to create, we ask them to call forth new life. And with that invitation comes the sacred responsibility to hold things recently-born with care and respect. Of course, we might encourage artists to add color here, re-draft there, imagine additions, push limits, and resist the temptation to fall in love with their own made-objects. But when those same objects are in my teacher-hands, I want to handle them with dignityâcradle them same way I would hold any living thing new to this world.Â
Anna Plemons is a guest teaching artist at California State Prison-Sacramento, where she works with groups of writers under the bureaucratic umbrellas of mental health services, inmate self-help programs, and protective custody.  She is also a PhD candidate in Rhetoric and Composition at Washington State University where her primary research interests revolve around teaching and writing in prison, and the complications and implications of such work.  Contact Anna Â
Also by Anna Plemons in ALT/space:
The End of the Prison Honeymoon
Color Theory for Writing Teachers
Poem Number 99
The Teacherâs Chair
The Worst Teacher Ever
Showing Up
Working in Impossible PlacesÂ
This is the final post in our January series inspired by an interesting confluence of December submissions from our contributors around how perceptions of who can and can't make art affect their teaching practice. Enjoy! âMalke Rosenfeld, ALT/space Editor
âŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠ..
Sharing a table with several parents at a school event, conversation came around to my being a music teacher. In the course of the conversation comments came out of a type I have come to accept as inevitable when discussing my field with those outside it. If I had to categorize it I suppose it would be something like this âTalent: those who have it and those who don't.â It tends to crop up in relation to some child or another, my having it as a professional in the field, or poignantly, the adult's perspective that they themselves do not possess this âtalentâ which is required to make music.
It boggles my mind how universal this perspective is. I have heard the same tone, the same assumptions from individuals for many years. As to the source of such perspectives I can only speculate although I have learned of an alarming number of instances where an educator has informed some child that they âcannot sing.â It seems apparent to me that many individuals have years of practice envisioning themselves as ânon-musicians.â
Marco came to class a beginner; he was in his early thirties and had purchased a guitar several years before. He was very attentive and put in the time between classes to learn the skills we covered. Right away he stood out as one of the best players in the class. This made it easy to achieve my first goal: establish an open and positive relationship in the context of trying out new things on the instrument and with the music. His ability to succeed on first or second try saved him the anxiety that students commonly feel in attempting to make a sound (the âright soundâ) and failing.
How did I facilitate all of this? Actually, my method is simply to listen and watch acceptingly â I tend to make students feel at ease in this way, structuring my comments to first support what is good and effective in their playing. Marco tended towards shyness but I think that my support and his skill resulting from good studying helped him to get his first successes as a musician.
After our nine-week class ended, Marco continued by taking private lessons with me. Near the beginning of this time he happened to mention a song he wanted to learn and this request brought about the next level of this student's comfort. It was a song he liked and I knew it was within his reach to learn it.
When a person learns to perform for himself a song that has already earned a favored place in his heart, it is truly magical. It goes beyond mere achievement; it creates a bond with the individual and the music. As we sat there in our little room playing and singing this song together I could feel him gaining confidence and enjoying the sounds he was making. My backing him up was also very helpful--it's a technique I use often that allows us to participate together and, at the same time, allows me to cover him up just enough so he doesn't feel overexposed.
Each achievement described here helped Marco build the foundation for the next. Crucial to this work was that Marco allowed himself the very new experience of performing music.
I had given him composition exercises along the way, and experiences with improvisation too, but one day we started talking about writing a whole song. I helped him set parameters such as key, chords, structure, topic to help him make sense of the many-faceted task of songwriting. Marco came back with the entire song in a workable draft. After a few more lessons revising it settled into what we both felt was a pretty final form.
His song was beautiful. The lyrics were subtle and witty, with a charming balance of poignancy and humor. The melody and harmony were perfectly suited stylistically. It was simple and effective, I was thrilled. He played it, I played it for him, we recorded him playing it, we wrote out a lead sheet for it.Â
Talent: Not innate, simply the ability to persevere, learn new skills, take risks and enjoy the challenge. Â
Jay Albert is a musician and educator. His professional vision is to share music and help people achieve more of a connection to it, whether helping students learn to play or âteachingâ an audience by means of a performance. He founded his company Songdog Music to further that vision. Jay holds degrees in guitar, music theory and composition from Baldwin Wallace Conservatory of Music and Kent State University. He has taught at both of his alma maters and elsewhere, from PreK to graduate level, and has presented at and supervised arts education departments for several organizations. Contact Jay  www.songdogmusic.com
Also by Jay Albert in ALT/space:
What I Learned in Summer Camp
From Eye to Ear
Errors, Trials and Process
Birth of a Song
Finding the In Door to Music
What Young Children Can Do | Annie Harrison Elliot
This is the third post in our January series around how perceptions of who can and canât make art affect their teaching practice. Enjoy! âMalke Rosenfeld, ALT/space Editor
âŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠ..
I teach young kids, but at some point I realized my assumptions were getting in the way. The reason I teach very young children in the first place is because I believe strongly in their capabilities and creativity, but at the same time their age was limiting how I was thinking about teaching them. Once I adjusted my thinking from âwhat are they too young to do,â to âwhat they can do,â my teaching process became much more fulfilling.
I decided to challenge myself by encouraging my three year old drama students to participate in a scene or at least a âscene-like-structure.â I racked my brain on how to approach this in the classroom. âAre they too young for scene work?â I wondered. In the traditional way, yes. A 3 year old is not going to do a scene analysis of Romeo and Juliet. I thought about how we had begun our dramatic learning earlier in the session with one-word story circle with pass the sound games, and by acting out fairytales and fables as a group. Through these games, they had begun to understand (at their learning level) concepts of beginning, middle, and end, as well as narrative structure. I felt we were making progress, but I also felt like somehow they could be doing more. I needed to ask myself again, âWhat can they do?â
In order to create a scene-like-structure, I decided to bring in two non-working cell phones to drama class. I set up two chairs in the stage area of the classroom and the students took turns being the audience and the actors. The students who were the audience decided on what character each actor should be, starting with âmommy,â âdaddy,â âgrandma,â or the âfamily pet.â Then we decided that âmommyâ would call âdaddyâ on the phone and talk about ______________. I would invite the students to come up with the topic of discussion and fill in the blank. Then the two actors would call each other on the âphoneâ and voila! An improvised scene! The concreteness and familiarity of the phone -call served as an effective vehicle to introduce the concept of dialogue. Each of the students had previously witnessed their parents and other adults having conversations on the phone, so they could actually utilize their âown experienceâ to make a scene. This allowed them to translate their own powers of observation about the world into an art form.
Over the next few weeks, I gradually took away the cell phones and, over time, the students started creating more complex scenes with a wider variety of characters and topics.
I now apply the same approach to my dance classes for the very young. Once I changed my thinking from âwhat are they too young to doâ to âwhat they can do,â I noticed more gains in my studentâs creative abilities. For example, we turned a game of freeze dance into a choreographic exercise. Every time the students froze I would give them a new instruction such as, âfreeze in the shape of a triangle,â or âfreeze down low or up highâ or other directives such as âwhen you freeze find a friend.â
Once we did this for a while, I gradually pulled back, and found they were able to start making shapes and choices on their own. They were starting to grasp choreographic process at age 3. Now, if I ever catch myself thinking, âWhat are they too young to doâ I pause and remember these important lessons Iâve learned as a teaching artist. âNo, they are never too young..âÂ
Annie Harrison Elliott is currently a teaching artist in Atlanta, GA and is the founder of Eyes on the Sky, Arts Learning. Through her organization, she teaches and implements programs in dance, drama, creative writing, and playwriting for children. Annie has a BA in Dance and Creative Writing from Franklin & Marshall College and a MA in Arts Education from New York University. As an actor, dancer, and playwright, she has been a teaching artist for Education in Dance and the Related Arts (NYC), The Fulton Theatre (PA), a guest artist for Franklin & Marshall College, and an acting and dance instructor in various studios throughout the United States. www.eyesontheskylearning.com
Also in ALT/space by Annie Harrison Elliott:
Breaking Down Barriers to Dance: A Multi-Disciplinary ApproachÂ
I have spent my life learning to be a good collaborator. I create performance work together with groups of people including actors, dancers, visual artists, musicians, and writers. As a director of devised work I facilitate collaborative processes with adults all the time. When I work with people I know we use a process we have developed over the course of the past few years, but we also try all different things. We sometimes talk about throwing cake at the wall and seeing what sticks; itâs not a clean process. Collaboration is messy; it means fights, and feelings sometimes getting hurt. It means stepping back and trusting that the group knows the right direction, it means letting the story come organically instead of trying to force it.Â
This year I have been working with Ms. Hoke, a third grade English teacher at Andrew Wilson Charter School in New Orleans, to devise radio dramas with her students. The students have been working over a course of  ten weeks in groups of six to create an audio drama from scratch. They designed their setting as a group, created a storyboard as a group, choose music and sound effects as a group, and even wrote a script as a group.
I spent a lot of time talking about character voice, and how music can create mood and tone. Ms. Hoke taught the students about logical advance of events in a story.  We carefully scaffolded the creation process so that the writing would not overwhelm the students. But on day one problems started arising. We asked the students to work in their groups to pick the setting of their story and draw it as a group on a huge piece of paper. We asked them to go around and share their ideas, and pick the one the group thought worked best.Â
When we gave the signal to begin everyone started talking at once. When the din subsided some peopleâs ideas had been put down and students were devastated that people werenât listening to them, and frustrated that they had to go along with ideas they did not think were as good as theirs. Most groups were at a stalemate, fighting over what to draw instead of drawing. Ms. Hoke and I realized that we needed to scaffold more than the writing process if our students were going to be successful in the project. We were going to need to teach collaboration. I was terrified. After all, I feel like I am still learning lessons about collaboration-- how was I going to teach it to my students?
Ms. Hoke and I started throwing cake at the wall.  We added extra steps to every lesson. We made âcompromiseâ a vocabulary word and talked about its meaning before every class. We started talking about strategies that can help us come to a decision as a group, instead of just thinking that a group decision would happen.
Sometimes the results were beautiful. One group in our first class of third graders decided to combine their ideas for a setting to come up with something better. One eight-year old wanted to do a story set inside of Popeyeâs (a fast food chicken joint), the other wanted to do a story set inside of an octopus. They decided their final setting was an octopus inside of Popeyeâs. I had to trust the process as much as they did so I let them go with it. What came out at the end was a hilarious story about a group of people who go to Popeye's only to have the whole restaurant eaten whole by a very hungry (and very giant) octopus. (You can listen to it at [email protected] if you want, itâs great.)
Sometimes things were stillâŠmessy. Personality conflicts arose and I ended up routinely taking students out of the room to talk them through what to do when they felt like they were not being heard, or when they were having trouble listening. I learned that I could coach a student through a rough spot individually, but that it was also important for them to learn the skill of stepping up to be heard when they needed to be heard, and stepping back when they needed to listen. It was okay that things got a little messy, as long as at the end of the day every student was proud of and invested in what they had made as a group.
1. Hold on tight, let go easy. A colleague of mine from Hand2Mouth Theater in Portland gave me this language, and I love it. It means own your ideas enough to hold them close, and trust the group enough to let them go when someone has a better idea. So when one student wanted to write a story that took place at the beach, she had to adjust when everyone else was exited about having a story that took place inside a mall. She fought hard for her idea, and it was difficult for her to be engaged for a few days after her setting wasnât chosen. However, by the time we got to storyboarding her story she had released her idea so that she could be fully engaged in what the group was doing.
2. Listening is hard; we need to work at it. Often when it was time for us to make a decision everyone in a group would start taking at once, and no one would give way. The students had to discover that if we all talk at the same time, we canât hear each other, let alone listen. Itâs really difficult to stay quiet when someone is talking about an idea that you donât like but if you donât listen you come to stalemate and canât move forward.
3. Our ideas together are better than our ideas alone. When in doubt, combine. This is how we got a beach party in space, a burger shop on the moon, a volcano in a mall and more.
4. We cannot be afraid of glorious failure. This might be a mantra for me as much as it is for my students. When Iâm not afraid to fall flat, or am able to go out on a limb and support with all my power a character like Mr. Cheerios, who could have become a flop but instead became a class favorites.Â
Collaboration is messy, but it is a skill I use every day in the working âadultâ world. Itâs a skill I know my students need to succeed, and itâs a skill my art form can instill. I canât be afraid to let my students go through the messy process of throwing cake at the wall if I want them to develop essential skills. The bigger the risk, the bigger the reward.Â
Bonnie Gabel is a director, theater maker, and arts educator. She has taught theater, creative movement, acrobatics, digital storytelling, puppet making, and costume design and construction to children and adults of all ages. Bonnie currently works as a drama integration specialist with grades preK-8 with KidSmART in New Orleans. She leads workshops for teachers on using theater techniques to reach multiple learning styles. She is artistic director of Night Light Collective, a multi-city womenâs ensemble performance company that works through physical improvisation to create original work and re-envision classic texts. Â
Here's the second post in our January series about can't, not, and aren't in relation to art making and teaching. Â We had an interesting confluence of December submissions from our contributors; completely independent of each other, four of our writers sent in a story on this theme of limits. Two more to come later in the month. Enjoy! âMalke Rosenfeld, ALT/space Editor
âŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠ..
Iâve been doing a lot of thinking lately about why so many of my students are quick to emphatically tell me, âI am NOT an artist.â For many of my students, (high school seniors enrolled in a one year exploratory teacher preparation program), the artist/non-artist dichotomy prevails, and there seems little room for the liminal spaces in between. But why is this? How did my students land hereâso certain in their state and fate as non-artists? In encouraging my students to embrace an arts integrated pedagogy in their future classrooms, Iâve been forced to recognize and acknowledge their anxiety about making art and facilitating arts-based lessons.  This has left me pondering a question that kept surfacing throughout the year: Do you have to be an âartistâ to make art?
This seemingly simple question would appear to have an obvious answer: No! Of course you donât have to be an âartistâ to make art! A passing glance at some of the work my students have produced confirms this answer (image below). But in talking to my students over the course of the year, and trying to figure out the why and where of this question, a few things have become clear to me: this is a complicated question tied up with studentsâ identities and perceptions about what counts as art; and just because we tell students they donât have to be artistic or artists to participate in art experiences doesnât make it so. If students donât feel some level of success and pride in their work, they tend to give upâand with art class available to âgive upâ or drop once they hit high school, art becomes the outlier, only available to those with âtalent,â and it rarely makes an appearance in any of their other classes.Â
Academy students' individual & collaborative silk-screen projects
So why is it that so many students give up art? Artist and author Lynda Barry (2008) suggests we are all plagued by what she calls âThe Two Questionsââthe questions we ask ourselves when judging our own artistic work: âIs this good?â and âDoes this suck?â These are questions Barry argues emerge as we age and as we begin to judge our work as an object rather than as an experience.Â
What Barry and my students so clearly identify is an overemphasis on the final product with little attention paid to the rich and valuable practices present within the process of making art. This is not to say the focus should shift entirely to the process, which would create yet another problematic dichotomy: process/product. The process/product dichotomy is quite prevalent within my studentsâ discussions about art, with many of them seeing art experiences in two distinct ways: either as âcool way to express emotionsâ where the final product has no value; or an exercise in futility resulting in a subpar product. Â
I myself have been guilty of reinforcing this dichotomy, always favoring the process over the product, insistent that if we just focus on the process we would open the doors for more students to feel comfortable attempting art. But this vision is limited as well, and thanks to one of my students, Jessica, I have begun to rethink my position and consider the grey areas, the recursive spaces that feed both the process and the product. Jessica, who actually took studio art in high school, still does not identify as an artist and struggles to see the art she made in my class as âgoodâ despite her powerful work (see earlier post, Snow Angles and Silence). While the process is important to her, it canât be separated completely from the product, and for Jessica, the final product is what plays into whether or not you get to call yourself âartist.â Jessica describes it like this:
âI think that part of it is that by identifying yourself as an artist, you've set a bar for yourself. And I think for myself, I donât have confidence in my abilitiesâI wish I did, but I donât. So, I donât have the confidence to put that bar for myself or have others judge if I hit that bar. I donât think I hit that bar. I have a certain image in my head about what kind of art an artist would create and mine does not come to that levelâŠFor me itâs the process that I enjoy and honestly, usually, Iâm disappointed by the final product, which makes it, it dampers the experience, because I can see what Iâm going for, I can see what I would want it to look like, and I donât have the ability to do it.â
For Jessica, like many of my students, the process is inextricably linked to the product and the judgment attached to that final product. My conversations with Jessica have illuminated my understandings of how a studentâs perception of their final product plays into their ability to engage completely with arts experiences. They also have forced me to rethink my own facilitation of arts based lessonsâdid I provide enough structure and instruction of arts techniques that would result in studentsâ âsuccessâ or did I vaguely offer my students an opportunity to âexpress themselves through artâ? How is this different than my writing pedagogy, where I provide extensive and detailed instruction about technique, language, and the all important revision process? As an academic teacher implementing an arts-integrated pedagogy, how might I be positioning the arts in ways that might actually hinder my studentsâ capacity for imagining how the arts could be used in their future classrooms? A true arts-integrated approach it seems should honor both the process and productâand the arts should not be the outlier, but rather, an integral part of the learning.
References
Barry, Lynda (2008). What it is. Montreal: Drawn & Quarterly
Debora Broderick teaches outside Philadelphia, in a dual-enrollment program for high school seniors interested in education careers. A former English, Creative Writing, and Art teacher, Deb employs an arts integrated pedagogy and methodology in this early pre-service teacher preparation program.  Deb is also an EdD Candidate at The University of Pennsylvania in Reading/Writing/Literacy, where her research focuses on using the arts as a method of inquiry into teacher identity development and critical literacy issues. As a creative writer, poet, and (sometimes!) visual artist, Deb is interested in exploring the role the arts can and should have in teacher preparation and education. [email protected] | Twitter: @debbroderick
Also by Debora Broderick in ALT/space:
Multimodal compositions: Using sketchbooks for critical inquiry in teacher education
Snow Angels, Silence, and Finding Places of Freedom in the ClassroomÂ
Between the Rattle and the Ease: Artâs Role in Teacher Education
This is the second in a four-part series illustrating the work happening at KID smArt in New Orleans, LA featuring both teaching artist and administrative voices. There's a new post every Monday this month. Read the first post in this series here and donât forget to put ALT/space in your feed reader so you wonât miss a thing! âMalke Rosenfeld, ALT/space Editor
⊠⊠⊠⊠⊠⊠⊠.
Through the years that I have worked with KID smART and, especially in the last eight years, I have come to understand one truth that guides my work--the best use of our resources is investing in artists.Â
As a program director and manager, I have always believed that decisions should be made by the people who will be living with the repercussions. Since we started investing in training our artists and building their skills and capacities, I feel like this is truer than ever. Our organization works in a transitional and complex environment. So much is different from school to school and classroom to classroom. Organizationally, we are driven by our flexibility and responsiveness to our individual schools and teachers and it is impossible to do that from behind an administratorâs desk. Our artists are our lifeline to the teachers and kids we serve and they know best what they need to do their job well and to make the work relevant and powerful for our schools
In New Orleans we have a fractured public school system. Since Hurricane Katrina, our public school system has transformed into an almost exclusively charter system. Currently, over three-fourths of the 90 public schools in the city are charters and 84% of our students are enrolled in charter schools[i]. We have also seen a great influx of new, young classroom teachers coming through alternative certification programs such as Teach for America and TeachNOLA. These teachers have passion and drive but sometimes lack the experience, tools, and knowledge of student culture that could make them truly effective. In the years after Katrina we found that often KID smART teaching artists were the most experienced educators in a school.Â
We realized that we could help build the capacity of the classroom teachers with whom we worked. We started the Arts Experience in Schools (AXIS) program in partnership with local arts organizations to create an opportunity for classroom teachers to come together and learn arts integration strategy. We brought together teachers from around the city together with a consultant from out of state. These monthly sessions helped teach our teachers how to develop arts integration strategy in their own schools.Â
After the first year we realized that our own team of artists, who were already working in residency in the schools, had the potential to lead these workshops just as  powerfully and with the added bonus of having already established relationships with the schools and teachers.Â
We also realized that over the long run, paying for someone to train our artists in how to create and present workshops would not only build artist skill and earning potential, but cut that consultant budget by over 75%. We would have better trained, local artists leading workshops and being paid presenter fees and at the same time save the organization money by taking travel and hotels out of the budget. Â
We also utilize our teaching artistsâ expertise when we expanded our programming team. Rather than hiring from an arts administration program (my own background!) we decided to give full time programming positions from our teaching artist faculty. We currently have three teaching artists who spend twenty hours per week during the school year leading residencies in schools and the remaining time working with us in our office. Each of the artists has a different background and area of expertise within our administrative structure.Â
Heather Muntzer is a visual artist and has been the key in making our program documentation and publications shine. She has designed templates for our teaching artists to use for parent newsletters, bulletin boards in schools and has taught us all how to create beautiful and impactful work-in-process blogs to make our students' learning visible.
Aminisha Ferdinand is a theater artist and native New Orleanian who has moved into full time arts integration coaching at three of our schools. She has a strong interpersonal intelligence and is a guide for all of us in developing relationships with teachers. Because of her years as a teaching artist she also spends time coaching teaching artists who are struggling with co-teaching or need support making connections with students.
Sean Glazebrook is a theater artist who also founded and helps run a local theater company. Because of his experience with running logistics and dealing with all of the spinning plates of theater production, he focuses on some of our special projects and state wide work which require someone with the patience, focus and organization.Â
Without the initial realization that we should invest in our artists, our organization might look much different, and not be nearly as powerful or effective. We now feel like a truly artist driven organization and over the past few years the quality of our work has increased as we have engaged in real and deep conversation about how and why we do this work.Â
As Program Director at KID smART, a New Orleans based arts education organization, Elise Gallinot Goldman has been crafting imaginative and instructive collaborative artist residency and professional learning programs in arts integration for the past thirteen years. Elise has been instrumental in developing partnerships with New Orleans cultural partners and has designed and presented engaging professional development for teaching artists and classroom teachers.  She received her B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Georgia in Athens, her Masters Degree in Arts Administration from the University of New Orleans, and has researched and trained in best practices through national models including the Kennedy Center, Understanding by Design, ArtsConnection, New York and Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education. Â
Our second January series here on ALT/space was inspired by an interesting confluence of December submissions from our contributors. Completely independent of each other, four of our writers sent in a story relating a can't, not, or aren't in relation to art making. This is truly the beauty of ALT/space for me -- how our stories of teaching practice are at once unique and related at the same time! Enjoy! --Malke Rosenfeld, ALT/space Editor
...............................................
There is a point in any drama workshop, no matter if it is a single session or nine weeks long where I hear a familiar phrase. I hear it from adults and children alike, middle to high school. It is uttered when we are doing improv, when we are brainstorming, when we are developing a story or a character or a movement sequence. It can surface when the only instruction I have given is, âyou can do anything in the world you want, but you must do somethingâ.
âI canât think of anything.â
I love this phrase! I used to hate it, thinking it was the death of the energy in the room, but now I look at it as a challenge because I know this is when my job really begins. After all, generating ideas is essential to creation and students will never be able to move forward if they âcanât think of anythingâ.
A while ago I had a new group of eighth graders starting their drama exploration. It didnât take long for someone to say it. It came out during an exercise where they were each to take the lead at some point in creating a simple movement that the rest of the ensemble was to support by matching the leader. It was a simple beginning ensemble exercise that came to a screeching halt when the action froze and the next student in sequence said, âI donât know what to do.â
Creativity doesnât magically happen. John Cleese of Monty Python fame delivered a lecture on the process of creativity in 1991 that has recently resurfaced on the Internet in which he says that creativity âis not a talent, it is a way of operating.â
In the drama classroom it is all about a way of operating. Giving students the tools with which to invent and develop ideas.  Making time, giving space, and encouraging a willingness to be open to anything. I encourage them to try different approaches because I know without a doubt that they absolutely can think of something to do. The drama room is a laboratory with the space and time for ideas to be born.
One way I create space and time for ideas is with an exercise that goes by many names-- creative visualization, guided imagery, dramatic imagination--but I just call it âplay timeâ. As children this kind of activity was just part of the way we operated when we had free time, but as we got older it became more difficult to squeeze it into our busy schedules. In the drama room, the exercise is rekindled.
Guiding the students into relaxation and breathing, they center themselves and open their minds. Focusing inward on their body sensations and breathing patterns takes away stress and enables them to think beyond their own personal insecurities. Once we have spent time getting into the proper operating mindset the imagination takes over and they are open to possibility.
Since it is theater, we need to get up our feet and move into the scene. I count backwards from ten and clap my hands. They sit up and are allowed to move at their own pace. Using their body in the space they tentatively explore the world they created. Hands run across the top off tall grass, eyes half close and noses breath in the sweet smell of wildflowers, and for some the frame of their body opens up to soak in the sunlight.
I am there as a guide, keeping them safe and making sure our session is uninterrupted. After giving them stimuli and a few checkpoints along the way they write their own script. They are the director, the designer, the dramaturg and the main character using the entire space as their stage. In silence they explore, only interacting with another if the situation seems right and they are invited in.
Lasting anywhere from 30 to 60 minutes, the session ends with the final checkpoint being the stage that they started from. Counting backwards again, they slowly come out of their play. Breathing returns to normal, they make eye contact with one another, and look at a space filled with possibility. We take a short break and begin to talk.
What kind of field were you in? Did you seek out shelter from the storm? Was the helicopter friendly or dangerous? What was in the package that fell? How did you feel when you were being chased? Where did you go when the pursuers had passed?
It isnât that students canât think of anything; itâs just that they have not been shown how to get in an open frame of mind. They are often not allowed the time and space to create or be imaginative. And in the absence of operating with an open mind, they havenât developed the ability to trust their own instincts.
Their journals come back to me the next day after a session filled with pages and pages of text. Vivid descriptions fully thought out ideas, and conflicts of all varieties. Pieces of their stories re-surface as we develop ideas throughout the course. It is a reference point for theatrical terms such as being in the moment and emotional recall. The more we practice the process, the easier it is for them to bring themselves to an open frame of mind when they need it.
While I do teach them acting techniques and theater history, the most important thing I do is giving them the experiences that build confidence to createâpracticing with them the process of getting into a space where their imaginations are endless. Â
Jeff Redman is the middle school drama teacher at American International School Dhaka, Bangladesh. He founded the Ivey Award winning Workhouse Theatre Company in Minneapolis where he served as Artistic Director for six years. Jeff leads workshops for educators and was invited to present his workshop, Injecting Drama! at the NESA conference in Athens, Greece. He holds a B.S in Theater and M.A. in teaching.  Jeff is currently working on connecting ex-pat students to local Bangladeshi artists. [email protected]Â
Also by Jeff Redman in ALT/space:
Drama Class, Day One
When Art Meets Life
Bamboo: Tools of Storytelling
Making Sense of Modern Day Slavery through Theater
What If? Making Way for Collaboration
It's a New Year with lots of fabulous new stories for ALT/space! Generally, in this space we share multiple smaller stories of individual practice that, over time, create a multi-dimensional picture of the contributor's teaching personality and approach. But what if we did the same thing with an individual organization? This is the first in a four-part series illustrating the work happening at KID smArt in New Orleans, LA featuring both teaching artist and administrative voices every Monday this month. Don't forget to put ALT/space in your feed reader so you won't miss a thing! --Malke Rosenfeld, ALT/space Editor
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I have unique task for a teaching artist: I am supposed to work with a group of fourth graders who have particularly intense behavior struggles to improve their overall classroom behavior. While arts integration is generally used to help students access core academic content like math, science, and reading, our class employs visual arts integration to target social emotional objectives â like being able to express oneself, and working safely and successfully as a group. Particularly, I work with students have characteristics of depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and we use advanced visual art techniques to tap into coping mechanisms and self-acceptance.
For our first class together, I asked the kids to compose self-portraits. They were supposed to use elements of collage and pay special attention to the shapes on their faces -- triangular noses, circular pupils, and lips shaped like bows. This was an introductory activity to get us acquainted with supplies and artistic concepts, building up to some larger, full-scale art pieces that would incorporate a variety of media and techniques.
For the most part, this was a calming and engaging project. Fourth graders in New Orleans have to take high-stakes standardized tests, which makes fourth grade a year that everyone cares about, and simultaneously dreads. As a result, fourth grade teachers necessarily give their students lots of test prep; filling lessons with bubble-in answer documents and daunting packets of worksheets. The students making self-portraits that day seemed generally grateful for the momentary respite from right answers and ScanTron pages. I say âgenerallyâ because there was one noticeable exception. Iâll call him Justin.
Justin -- a short nine-year-old with big, square-shaped glasses, tightly-cropped hair, and endlessly skeptical facial expressions -- started his self-portrait several times, but he never got very far. He cut out a large, brown oval out of construction paper for his head. He ripped up the large, brown oval immediately after cutting it out. âIt looked like a potato,â he said. âMy real head is no potato.â
There are lots of kids like Justin, and they become more and more prevalent as classes get older. These are kids who want their art to look a very particular way, the first time they make it. If they canât achieve perfection, they shut down and give up. These kids, of course, blossom into the kinds of adults who say to their colleagues, âOh, I canât draw. Iâm a terrible artist.â Unfortunately, thatâs a statement we have all heard far too often among our grown-up friends. At some point, art stops becoming something everyone can create and be successful at, no matter who they are; and turns into something that a person can get ârightâ or âwrong.â
This mentality is a fabrication, of course. Creativity is all about mistakes, and the only thing that makes art âgoodâ is the honesty and dedication of the person who created it. This is why, in my opinion, very young children are the best artists. Young children use pictures to translate the world in a way that makes sense to them. Justin, for one reason or another, got a grown-up mindset about art a little earlier than his peers. This, unfortunately, was to his detriment.
For our next session, I had students create large body shapes to which they would attach their head self-portraits. This time, I sat with Justin the whole time. Every time he told me he couldnât do something (like draw hands, or feet), I guided him through the process. Much of the time, I did the drawing for Justin. I know this is a huge no-no in teaching art, but I thought of it the way I think about reading out loud to a child who is learning to read: You donât want them to depend on you forever, but you do it at first so they donât give up on themselves.
For a few weeks, I sat with Justin, helping him through the tough steps. Slowly, he asked me for less and less help. He started drawing eyes on his own after a particularly in-depth lesson on the shapes that make up eyes. There were still classes where heâd tear his work up. He never said he was proud of it. But nevertheless, the training wheels started to come off.
Then one day, we were doing a particularly difficult project. It was a 3-D mask built out of scraps of corrugated cardboard. The cardboard was hard to cut, and lots of kids were feeling frustrated so I was spread pretty thin in the classroom, helping students with tougher shapes and making sure their pieces were attached the way they wanted. For the most part, kids created masks that looked a lot like my model: a prism-shaped nose, a rectangular mouth, and a jutting jaw line. I didn't have enough time to help Justin. I didn't even think about it.
But then, as class was ending, I noticed him. He had been working so quietly and with such focus that I had almost missed him. His mask was almost done -- and heâd done it all on his own. It was amazing: huge, blocky eyebrows; jutting, conical eyes; a big, screaming mouth. Honestly, my heart skipped a beat when I saw it. It was just the kind of weird, amazing, unique work of art that every teacher dreams of seeing their student create.
I practically ran over to Justin once I noticed his work. âDid you do this yourself?â I asked him. âYeah.â He said. And then, really quietly, almost too quietly to hear, he said, âIt looks cool, huh?â
In teaching art, I find that I am not only teaching children the skills and techniques necessary to craft an expert practice. I am also -- if not mostly -- teaching children how to be self-confident enough to eventually make art without prompting or help. I want them to love art, and to feel like they have the capacity to create it. I want them to silence their own internal voices that tell them they canât.
Sophie Lucido Johnson is a writer, artist, and teacher in New Orleans. She is the editor-in-chief of the artistic literary magazine Neutrons Protons and the co-producer of the New Orleans storytelling show and podcast Shipwrecked!. She has been a special education teacher and coordinator for five years, and is collaborating to write an arts-integrated social emotional curriculum for students with emotional differences and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.Â
ALT/space is about the work of artists who teach in schools, communities and prisons. ALT/space contributors advance the teaching artist field by writing specific, concrete, and powerfully personal stories about what they do and how they do it.
2013 on ALT/space gave us a deep, rich, wide, and timeless swath of stories about teaching artist practice. To celebrate the New Year, let's take a look back at some of the most evocative and relevant ALT/space stories from the past year. Â Â
As you read, I ask you: How can you ignore the deep expertise and passion for art and learning evident in these posts? Â Some question, some observe and ponder, some struggle, but ALL show the power and impact teaching artists have in schools and communities everywhere. Please consider your role in advocating for the teaching artist field and the work we do by sharing ALT/space with others. I also encourage you to consider adding your own stories to the mix in 2014.
Happy New Year!! Â --Malke Rosenfeld, ALT/space Editor
______________________________________
January brought us Working with Children on the Asperger-Autism Spectrum by Holly Adams.  This is perhaps the best, most nuanced piece of writing I have read about working with students on the spectrum. Holly's expertise in this area is applicable to all classrooms, arts-based or otherwise.
In February Ryan Conarro wrote a highly nuanced and helpful post about what it means to collaborate with teachers. Read his thoughts in Listen to Your Teacher. This is a must read.
In March Alison Holland wrote Taking My Daughters to Work which highlighted the struggles of balancing family with a freelance lifestyle. I hope 2014 brings more discussions like this one.
In all her posts, Anna Plemons reminds us and herself to question one's assumptions about art making in prison. In May Anna told the story of Poem Number 99, about a writer wrestling with the unspoken expectations about what he should write.
In June, in her post Head Spinning, Kate Plows shows us that the world of educational technology may be upon us but what we do with it, and how we think about it, is up to us.Â
In July, Jeff Redman brought us the third of four stories on collaborating with a humanities teacher to create theater about modern day slavery. Read Bamboo: Tools of Storytelling--it's a fabulous story.
Speaking of which, in August we celebrated two years of ALT/space online in the post The Well-Told Story!
In September I shared a series of interesting conversations I had with artist J.E. Johnson that proved to be generative and instructive on a lot of levels, especially about what it means to call yourself an artist who teaches. Read all three posts in the series: Beginning of Something New?, Interactions Between Art and Craft, and Wondrous Things.
In October Victoria Row-Traster brought us a story about the power of live theater...and all the work leading up to the magical moment when eleven-year-olds spontaneously began speaking the lines of Romeo and Juliet with the actors during the performance. Truly a marvelous story: Now You're Really Speaking My Language.
In November Anglea Gallo shared a story about college dance students working to find their own unique artistic voice in This is Hard.
Finally, December brought the excellent first post from new ALT/space contributor Meghan Zanskas called Planning for Play. She writes, "As an artist I find pleasure when playing around in the studio. As a teacher, I have long wanted to afford my students the same sense of creative freedom within the classroom. As a researcher, I've decided to see what happens when I try giving them that freedom."Â
What a great year. Â See you in 2014!
âŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠâŠ
Malke Rosenfeld is the editor and curator of ALT/space online and its associated print section in the Teaching Artist Journal.  Find out more about Malkeâs work as a teaching artist at www.malkerosenfeld.com.
As an artist I find pleasure when playing around in the studio. As a teacher, I have long wanted to afford my students the same sense of creative freedom within the classroom. As a researcher, Iâve decided to see what happens when I try giving them that freedom.
Keri Smithâs book, How to be an Explorer of the World, begins with a set of instructions: How to use This Book. I have found that this six-point list lends itself very well to art education. Itâs the last two that I like the best and use the most: number five, âTreat everything as an experiment,â and six, âStart with whatever makes you feel a twinge of excitement.â (Smith, 2008).
I kept these two instructions in mind when planning a recent lesson for my third grade artists. When inviting them to create, I wanted my plan to be less about what they would make and more about where they would start. Â I had a seed of an idea, something that gave me that twinge of excitement, so I decided to use Keri Smithâs advice and give it a try. I wanted to invite them to play during art class, without the goal of a final product in mind.
This wasn't entirely new for me. I've been reading a lot about the importance of play and freedom in student learning, and trying to implement it in my teaching. Being an elementary school art teacher, Iâm in the exciting position to impact the art experiences of over 600 students. Peter Gray says play is, âperhaps the key to repairing our broken education system â returning joy, fun and excitement to learning and education,â (Gray, 2013). In a chapter of The Learner-Directed Classroom, George Szekely says that âPlay is where art begins â in life and in an art class,â (Jaquith, 2012). With these statements in mind, and permission from Keri Smith to follow the twinge of excitement, planning for play has become my main mission in an effort to connect studentsâ school experiences with the important work of childâs play.
I started small, trusting that the kids would take the project wherever they needed it to go; and they did. After all, who doesn't like to play?
The permanency of the project had vanished with the glue â now it became a play workshop. My third grade artists arranged shared paper pieces to make things like these:
and a series like this:
and imposed self-directed limitations to create a series like this:
and expanded beyond their photograph to create narratives like these:
Meanwhile, Neil held up his photo face in front of his nearby friends, creating the illusion that his head was on each of their bodies. This erupted into a hysterical head-switching dance in part of the classroom. It seemed like a great time to treat everything as an experiment, so I offered them the class camera/tripod in case they wanted to make some photographs. Then they made things like this:
while collaborating like this:
As an artist, I was pleased with the creative acts happening all around the room. As an educator, I know that my students were experiencing the freedom to create without the pressure of a teacher-designed final product. Their ideas were celebrated, valued, recognized and documented.Â
When one art prompt can diverge into dozens of different creative concepts, the work of teaching becomes active and exciting. In this particular lesson I became a mentor and guide, not a director and expert. Rather than asking me what to do next, kids told me about their process, their exploring, their decisions, and their ideas; this play was serious stuff.
The creative tasks that my students designed for themselves came as naturally as any play game evolves. They were silly, serious, funny, scary, weird, crazy, and thoughtful. Some were slowly perfected and some were casually rushed. Everyone had her or his own momentum and purpose. It was an art studio and a laboratory of exploration.
The resulting art products capture the incredible imaginative and playful energy of that day.
At the close of every art class I make a note in my lesson plan book, to help jog my memory next week when the same students arrive at my door. That dayâs note: Best Day Ever.
That day I was lucky to witness the transformation of students given freedom to play, explore and create. And being there for the experience empowered me to continue planning for play.
References:
Gray, P. (2013). Free to Learn. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Jaquith, D., & Hathaway, N. (Eds.). (2012 ). The Learner-Directed Classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Smith, K. (2008). How to be an Explorer of the World. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Meghan Zanskas teaches visual art in two Maryland elementary schools. In her teaching, Meghan encourages creative exploration and development of expressive voice through student-centered learning. She believes in the strong connection between a student's growth in the arts and their over all well-being. Accordingly, her students learn to engage deeply with their artistic process, developing habits of mind that transfer to all areas of school and life. She holds a Master of Arts degree in art education from the Maryland Institute College of Art. Meghan and her students keep a blog at CCES Art Studio.Â
Teaching Art History through the Visual Culture of Contemporary Film | A. A. Sieunarine
I have been teaching a foundation course in Art History at Boricua College for two years. Although all the students live in New York City, home to a plethora of art museums and galleries, getting them to look at art seemed like an arduous chore. After many lectures and slide shows I realized this method had lost its effectiveness. As I entered through the majestic grand entrance way and staircase of the prominent architectural structure of the college (Audubon Terrace, a landmark early-20th century Beaux Arts/American Renaissance built in 1907) I thought about finding a way to connect the old with the new. How  could I paste the past visuals of old histories, art and artifacts within present human existence and help my students connect it to their contemporary world?
To start, I identified contemporary films that integrated the art and artifacts of ancient cultures with the present day. Â As an experiment, I showed the memorable ending of the film Tess of the DâUrbervilles that displayed the ancient megalithic ruins of Stonehenge, commonly believed in Thomas Hardyâs time to be a pagan temple and an ancient burial site. The visual imagery of Tess laying on the ruin, and the sun emerging thoughtfully behind her, created a moving contemporary visual of a pre-historic monumental past. Â
The students were alert and excited with the new approach. Integrating an excerpt of a contemporary film into teaching ancient art incited their curiosity. I wondered what would happen if I showed an entire film. Would the students get bored or loose track of the art history objectives while watching the film? I introduced Baroque art with the 17th Dutch painter Johannes Vermeerâs work through the film, The Girl With a Pearl Earring which fictionalized the creation of Vermeerâs painting.  I was a bit concerned that the students may not have the capacity to sit through the slow-paced film, but when I told them that Scarlet Johansson was the lead actress they were eager and excited. I decided not to show any visuals of Vermeerâs paintings until the end of the film, as I wanted them to extract the characteristics of Baroque art from the visual imagery in the film.
Image Source
As they watched the movie, I watched the students. Some stared at the screen with starry eyes, while others had conversations with each other. One student asked âWhy was Johansson so white? Is she really that white? Look at her skin, it's as white as her head tie." One male student who claimed to be in love with Johansson looked intently at her sultry performance as Griet, Vermeerâs assistant and ultimate sitter, with a penetrating gaze. I realized then that they were smitten with the actress and wondered if they had the sensitivity to see the Baroque-ness of magical play of light and color? At the end of the film, as Griet slowly opened the handkerchief that was sent to her by Vermeer, I heard one student say, âItâs those pearl earring, I bet you it is." As the lights went on another student said, âI felt as if I just saw a living painting." The students described the film as a magical experience and how they felt as if they were a part of the 17th century Dutch streets. We discussed how the film transcended time and place of a historical novel, which was based on the semblance of Vermeerâs life, and how the story itself was just that â a story.
Still, they argued that it felt so real, like a true story of how the Girl with a Pearl Earring was painted and that they understood the history behind paints and the importance of light in Vermeerâs paintings. They saw the contrast of the whitest white and the darkest dark, and they gave examples of scenes in the film. One student said there was a white light that glowed throughout the film. The emotional impact of the film left us all in a trance filled with images of bursting beauty that no text or words could equate. Need I say that the students captured the Baroque-ness effortlessly?
The next week in class we looked at slides of Vermeerâs paintings and they realized only then that they saw almost all of his paintings in the film. With excitement, a student said she went into a coffee shop and was startled to see a print of the painting Girl With a Peal Earring on the wall looking at her. She said, âIf I had not seen the film I would not have known who she was." âThat was done by Vermeer a Baroque artist,â she said she told her friend who was with her.
Understanding ancient art through contemporary film became a new paradigm in my pedagogical practice and seemed like a successful attempt to bring old cultures into the ever-changing classrooms of the 21st century. But, I was left wondering if an unknown actress would have had the same impact on the students. When I said, âNext week we will look at the film Persepolis,â one student asked, âWill Scarlet Johansson be in it?â
Androneth A. Sieunarine graduated with a Diploma of Education from Valsayn Teachers College in Trinidad, a Bachelors degree in Studio Art /Art History, a Masters in Art Education from Brooklyn College and  a Doctorate in Art Education from Columbia University, NYC. She is the curator and arts coordinator for New York City Art Teachers Association (NYCATA/UFT) and a delegate for New York State Art Teachers Association (NYSATA). As a painter and a cultural researcher Androneth teachers visual arts to High School students in New York using visual culture as a catalyst for motivation in the classroom. She also teaches an introduction to Art History from Pre -Historic to 20th Century Art at Boricua College in New  York City.
Also by Androneth Anu Sieunarine in ALT/space:
Inspired by Hopper: Seeing the Unfinished as Finished
Pop Portraits and Oscar Wilde
Bicycles in Studio 529
The Children of Abentenim
From Ghana to New York: Forming Art Communities
Doing arts-based professional development in lots of different places has presented one consistent, universal challenge: How can we explore complex, pedagogical ideas when our art-making materials must be simple enough to pass through airport security? While this is not a deeply critical concern, it does mean that adult students work with materials that have led to outdated âschool artâ (Efland, 1976) stereotypes being reinforced. I have seen too many hearts and rainbows made by default when grown-ups are frozen by child-oriented tools.
When confronted with those old limitations of markers, paper, and glue-sticks, I have used an Exquisite Corpseparlor game as an exercise for unpacking contemporary teaching and learning ideas with a wide range of professional development communities. The resulting outcome has been an increasing army of grownups who remember that playfulness still has an intellectual role in their serious work.
Exquisite Corpse was named by Surrealists in the early twentieth century as a working metaphor (and drinking game) for synthesizing playfulness and individual ideas with assigned structures and multiple voices. A single piece of paper is folded into three or four sections. A head, body with arms, legs, and feet is drawn or collaged onto each section and it is passed along so that each part is completed by a different person, and a final corpse or body is created. The flexibility of this simple artistic structure has provided a dynamic form for many professional development situations.
Creativity Corps
Pre-service, undergraduate teacher âcorps of creative corpsesâ, Syracuse University.
I played Exquisite Corpseas a game with education students who were trying to let go of fears about creativity and picture making. The final corps of corpses, or body of bodies, was thrilling because each individual was off the hook for creating something perfect on their own. The emphasis moved from their individual abilities or perceived disabilities and toward their shared roles in the work. Each individual was hunting actively for the parts that they contributed to different bodies. They could not believe that they created something so unique in fifteen-short minutes. This set the stage for a semester of fearless explorations and new ownership of creativity in their future classrooms.
Critical Thinking Corps
While the Surrealists were using Exquisite Corpse as a drinking game, progressive educator John Dewey (1938) was urging school systems to slow down highly-scheduled and standardized school schedules to incorporate more time for contemplation so that learners could reflect on their play or work. Similarly, when I used this game as an exercise in reflective and critical thinking with elementary teachers and teaching artists, we slowed down the process and used it to reflect on a day of study in an art museum.
Veteran teacher and teaching artist âcorps of critical corpsesâ, Parrish Art Museum.
The conversations that took place during each of the twenty-minute collage sections and the final critique were about frustrations teachers and teaching artists felt with school systems that did not allow them to work and play this deeply. Critical conversations emerged about using this as an instructional method for reading concepts, mathematical skills, and human ideals. The method became a possible tool for instruction, but being reminded about a slower pace and depth of thinking was even more exciting for these professionals who finished the day with a renewed determination to push back against efficient schedules and fight for more effective ways to use of learning time.
Communication and Collaboration Corps
Mixed âcorps of communicating, collaborative corpsesâ, Habla Center for Language & Culture.
During summer institutes in Connecticut, Long Island, Florida, and Merida, Yucatan, the combination of participants was so diverse and there were so many individual needs to address, it became hard to invigorate everyone around any artistic method. At those times, Exquisite Corpse has been an artistic metaphor for examining our own identities and understanding the ways that we can communicate and collaborate in diverse learning communities. Whether it was due to the summer âschoolâs outâ atmosphere, or to the intense commitment of teachers, artists, administrators, and cultural workers to figuring out new ways to improve their work, this approach always became a conversational celebration.
--------------------------------
During each of these Exquisite Corpse sessions, folks sat around tables, swapping images and chatting about their work, they formed a vocabulary of shapes, metaphors, and symbols. Strangers found common ground. Buddies imitated each other or played off of differences. When we unfolded our final corpses and put them together into a corps of ideas, it was impossible to find a way to end a critique. So many connections to life, and work, and each other emerged, that we often needed to sit together at lunch or head off to a local pub to finish those conversations.
Teaching artists found parallel structures of the Exquisite Corpse in their disciplines: open-ended writing prompts for poets, object transformation for actors, theme variation for musicians. Teachers found a form for better supporting collaborative projects, explaining narrative processes, and modeling formulaic structures in science and in math. We emerged with a nimble method for tackling unfolding issues in our work. We emerged â minds and bodies linked â as a more determined critical, creative, communicative, and collaborative corps.Â
Laura Reeder is a teaching artist who interrogates systems of teaching, learning, and social justice through her artistic practice. She trains next generation teaching artists in the Art Education program at Massachusetts College of Art & Design (MassArt). She is completing research on Teaching Artistry as a Critical Community of Practice at Syracuse University and continues to advocate for social change through artistic work in national policy making. Laura keeps all of her passions alive by maintaining her teaching artistry in both Syracuse, NY and Boston, MA. Contact LauraÂ
Also by Laura Reeder in ALT/space:
The Opposite of Anesthetic
How Older Adults Learn Choreography | Judith Sachs
I like to show my 80-year-old dancers examples of performances on YouTube in order to inspire them for the work weâre about to tackle. They are typically incredulous that they can see all that movement on my tiny iPhone screen and also of the opinion that âall those twists and turns are fine, but Iâm not 25 any more like you!â (I am 66.)
I learned my choreographic technique from training with Mark Morrisâs Dance for Parkinsonâs format. The idea is to help my students feel like they are graceful, limber, and accomplished, even if they canât stand up.
When Morris first thought about crafting dance classes for people with Parkinsonâs Disease, he went back to his own choreography to see what he had done that might be possible for non-dancers to recreate. Seated dancers can convey a great deal of what the whole body can do (the mourners in a semi-cirlce in Morrisâs âOrfeo ed Euridice,â for example)âso I always start my dancers with chairs to make them feel secure, even if we end up standing behind them or moving away from them.
Building muscle memory in an older dancer takes time and patience. Students have to be able to imagine the move before they do it. I both show and tell the group what to do (speaking the instructions about a half-second before I demonstrate the step); I use motivating language to get them to try something new; I convey the sequence of a phrase (what comes first, second, or third); and I talk about the musicality of it (âthis is a long, slow step so you can take your time and breathe hereâ). I then put the steps to music and indicate how they go together.
The Dance for Parkinsons training gives TAs tools that help to chunk up the phrases and teach them one at a time. My strategy is to evoke common images, like âpicking up your grandchild,â âsweeping crumbs off the table,â or âstepping out of a bathtubâ or (my personal favorite) âhelicoptering your hand until the propeller falls off.â I teach it first, with no music, and then, as I play my iPhone or ask my accompanist to start on the downbeat ââŠand-a 5,6,7,8,â I lead the dancers through the phrase and count it out to supply the rhythm.
Most of my classes meet only once a week, which means that any changes I make in the choreography once I have set the dance have to be very simple. Itâs hard enough to remember steps and sequences of movement when youâre 20âimagine how tough this is at 80. What I typically do is build a choreographic vocabulary made up of a few very distinct patterns. Then when I want to alter something or add a few nuances, my students are more likely to catch on. I find that the leaders in the group will go over the latest details with their companions during the week when they get together for coffee or a card game and this reinforces the changes.
They often want to discuss what is going to happen in the dance (as though they were ticking off items on a shopping list) before they actually do it, just to be sure they understood me. Weâll have a discussion about which moves come in which place and when they change. Then weâll run through. I try not to stop them because I feel the sequence and build of a dance is something the dancer learns from doing over and over. Also, stopping is frustrating. Once theyâre on a roll, I want the momentum to carry them!
In the video that follows, the dancers knew that I had studied with Alvin Ailey in the 1960s and had a feel for his choreographic styleâseveral of them had seen âRevelationsâ when the professional touring company came to Philadelphia in recent years. I stripped down one of the songs in the suite and made this a dance that they could perform physically and which also meant a great deal to them spiritually.
When I rise
Let me rise
Like a bird, joyfully.
And when I fall,
Let me fall,
Like a leaf
Without regret,
Joyfully!
There are only 6 words here that I needed to create the dance: ârise,â âfall,â âbird,â âleaf,â âregret,â âjoyfully.â As you can see in the video of one of my classes, not only do the words tell you what to do, but when you know the whole song, you can even perform it as a round, with one side of the room rising with the âbirdâ and the other side falling with the âleafâ simultaneously.Â
The amount of excitement and self-congratulation in the studio after accomplishing this is extraordinary. And it should be! Â I find that the joy, teamwork, and forgiveness for mistakes that go into the learning and performance of a dance mean more in later life when no oneâstudents or teacher-- takes anything for granted. Weâre dancing; weâre entertaining; weâre having a wonderful time.
Judith Sachs spent her early adult years as an actor and dancer in New York; then switched directions to write about preventive healthcare and teach corporate executives how to pitch ideas with passion. After a hip replacement at 60, she decided she desperately needed to dance again and trained as a Dance for Parkinsons teacher with founding director David Leventhal. She has been part of this program in Philadelphia since it began and uses the class format in her own ANYONE CAN DANCE program, designed for older adults and those in wheelchairs and walkers. In addition, she teaches a Dance for Dementia class at an Alzheimerâs facility in New Jersey. Judith is a member of the Lifetime Arts Teaching Artist Roster. Visit her site or contact Judith.Â
Also by Judith Sachs in ALT/space:
The Birth of an Elder Dance Teacher