Project Type: Arts
Location: Columbus
Status: Installation
Presented by the Knowlton School at The Ohio State University.
Curated by Team B (David Corns, Anna Kerr, Quinn Kummer, and John Stoughton)
Graphic Design by Garrett Corcoran.
Gallery team includes Banvard Gallery Chair Sandhya Kochar and Graduate Assistant Sanghyun Suh. Additional installation support from Shriya Ravishankar (Ohio State), Jamie Kruer (UIC) and Jaizhen Lin (Columbia University).
When and how did the idea for the gallery come together?
An initial version of this exhibition was held at our studio in Cincinnati to celebrate the opening of our practice in 2016. The idea to share the rejected work of our friends and colleagues was a way to expose often unseen design process and work that is in pursuit of a wider body of research, or way of thinking about design.
How were the pieces chosen and where are they from?
The show contains a collection of 100 drawings from over 50 practices. We invited a wide range of participants, from grad school students to professors of architecture to commercial practices with a global reach.
What is the most important aspect of the 'Rejected' theme? Why rejected?
We wanted to start a conversation about the messiness of launching a project - the swerves and corrections that are made over time, and ways to reassess or find value in fleeting images or ideas that might be otherwise lost or forgotten.
The show became a study on different interpretations and forms of rejection as interpreted by the invited firm. We have formalized this response in a forthcoming catalog / book that discusses the different forms of rejection brought to light from the show.
What do you hope people will gain from the exhibit?
Architecture today is widely consumed as an endless stream of images online - we can all scroll and swipe forever. A great deal of these images we only see for mere seconds, or milliseconds, before they leave our screen never to be seen again. This exhibit gives us an opportunity to slow down and re-visit some of the issues contemporary practices are actively dealing with, but have not yet resolved.
Why were the pieces rejected?
Rejection can and does happen at every stage of the design process. Whether it is from self-editing, peer review, client “tastes,” structural limits, etc. Each practice was asked why and how rejection affects their practice, and the specific project they chose to present in the show.
Is there anything about the exhibit you would like people to know?
We hung the images like clothing on a clearance rack, about 12” on center perpendicular to the viewer. This means you have two choices for viewing the drawings: you can walk with the images all facing you, or against you. If you choose the former, you will find you can walk relatively briskly through the gallery, absorbing images as we do on our phones at almost hyper speed. This renders the exhibition as a collective body of work, and you start to discover broad aesthetic similarities: colors, projection methods, formatting decisions, etc. Alternatively, if you walk against the grain, approaching the blank backs of each image, you will find this slows you down and allows you to discover and process each image individually.