well, most common way is through tulpamancy. here's a good thing i found on it. there's also tons of reddit threads you can find, like this one for example!
good post
found this doc
tip here
take another for good measure
beep
boop
blep
boing
bop
bep
bah
creating OCs/consuming media/asking BAH blogs and focusing on those while creating your system can help too! ^^ once you start, it becomes easier.
don't worry if it takes you a while, or if it happens quickly!!! everyone goes at their own pace :)
overall @created-system-hub @pluralhelp @tulpagenic-help and etc are good for tips or just scrolling down on their page!
p.s. if anything needs to be taken out, tell me (respectfully)!
hiya. For a bit I’ve been wanting to form a system. I’ve been lonely and I feel like I need help running this body. do you have some tips for trying to form one? i hope I didn’t come off wrong here.
Hello!
I have some resources for you.
(Now that im on my laptop this is SO much easier to link)
Soulbonding doc with abunch of links!
A TulpasForDummies doc with steps and instructions + methods!
Another Tulpa Forming 101 doc!
A doc FULL of abunch of Tulpa stuff and guides.
Ive used these myself before!
-Anddy
willogenic positivity, because willogenic systems & plurals are wonderful.
dear willogenic systems & plurals, you deserve to smile today. you are a joy to share community with. you are creative, you are talented, and you are enough. no matter your reason for willing your system, you are a valid part of our community. we love you!
when others choose hatred instead of the love you deserve, please always remember how important you are.
if you are a willogenic system who created their system to deal with stress, trauma, adversity, or bad situations, you are just as valid as any other system. your plurality being chosen doesn’t make it any less beautiful. you deserve to be happy, and be free from judgement and the meanness of others. if you are a willogenic system for reasons tied to adversity, that doesn’t make you any less willogenic. you deserve respect and kindness. your life experiences don’t negate your willogenic status, and your willogenic status doesn’t negate your life experiences.
your plurality is beautiful, and so are you! you are a lovely part of the plural community. please never forget that.
There is actually no legitimate reason to be against the concept of endogenic systems. There may be reasons to be critical of endogenic communities, but there is simply no reason to oppose the very concept of a system forming without trauma.
It's extremely telling that the only "arguments" I have seen against endogenic systems are:
1. Appealing to ignorance by saying the lack of current scientific evidence for endogenic systems must mean endogenic systems don't exist, when in reality it only means there is a lack of conclusive proof either way.
2. Arguing that endogenic systems are inherently and intrinsically ableist for simply existing
3. Hatred borne out of personal suffering being displaced onto those who do not suffer or do not appear to be suffering
4. Personal experience with some endogenic systems being used to justify hatred against all endogenic systems
None of these are real arguments. They all rely on completely faulty logic, appeals to emotion, and petty prejudice.
I have yet to see a single argument against endogenic systems that is faultless in its logic, there may be such an argument out there, but it's clear that the vast majority of anti-endo arguments are illogical, irrational, and overly emotional attempts to give moral licensing to hate on a group of people.
deciding to start willomancy as a singlet a few months back was genuinely one of the best decisions I’ve ever made. been free from suicidal ideation for the first time in years. fuck all this anti-willoverse bullshit I’ve been seeing going around. it’s going to die out soon enough cause it’s just a trend
go make that alter ! make that system ! let a little guy into your head if you want ! shout out to all my willogenics / addgenics and so on !! i support the grind !
To start us off: we are firmly pro-endo. The point of this post isn't to argue that endogenic systems exist and are valid - assuming that systems of any and all origins are valid is only the starting point to our argument.
The question we've been asking ourselves a lot recently is: does dividing systems based solely on their origins even make any sense at all in the long run?
The answer we've come to is: no, not really. The terminology itself is still useful, but more so when talking about origins of a single headmate, as opposed to the entire system. And if you're confused by that conclusion, then I encourage you to read the rest of this post below the cut.
Let me start be going through an example. Let's say that we're discussing a pretty newly-discovered traumagenic system. The term seems to suit them perfectly - there's a high chance that whatever trauma caused them to develop in the first place is still ongoing, and therefore every development inside their system will be tied to trauma in some way, because pretty much their entire life is. That situation is simple enough. But what happens when that system manages to escape the traumatic circumstances that have formed them? What happens when, after months or years of healing, most of their traumaholders either went dormant or processed their trauma and developed past their original purpose? If that system's recovery did not include final fusion as their final goal, they will still be a system. It is likely that new life situations will cause them to develop new headmates, headmates that will have nothing to do with the original origins of the system. After decades, most of the active headmates may have experiences way closer to those of the members of endogenic systems, because, in a sense... Those headmates would be endogenic. In situations like those, does it really make sense to define each system by merely the very beginning of their journey?
Something very similar can happen in reverse. When an endogenic system experiences trauma, it is likely that new headmates will form, and the experiences of those headmates may closely much those of traumagenic systems. But unless the entire system redefines themselves as being of mixed origins, any traumagenic-focused spaces, where they could search for community's support, would be closed off to them. Even if they would make the change to the label of mixed origins, many spaces will still reject them. But how does that make any sense? Why would we focus only on the moment of birth of one's system, when what shapes their experiences is their entire life?
The same argument may be made for willogenic and spiritual-based systems. Willogenic systems are capable of splitting new headmates completely unintentionally, just like systems of other origins are capable of constructing new headmates with the help of willogenic guides. Spiritual-based systems can gain new headmates 'just because', and due to trauma, and through constructing them, and in any other way, just as many systems of other origins have headmates that summon in new self-aware companions through their spiritual practices. Why would we pretend that the entire system has to fit its original label, as if systems weren't made up of living, breathing things, changing with each day as is in the nature of the living things?
Why are we, as a community, often so determined to see the forest for its first tree's single seed?
the future is plural means that somehow, one day, people won’t have to worry about losing friends for coming out as plural. somehow, one day, it will be a common courtesy to ask “who’s fronting?”. somehow, one day, plurality will be demystified, and no one will be expected to prove their plurality to anyone. somehow, one day, people will be called out on their pluralmisia and actually be willing to listen.
the future is plural means that somehow, one day, the world will be a little kinder :)
gracieabrams
germansingergirl
2087
yousharknotpass
titsay
blakekathryn
baratheonpilled
discoholicmusic
kianamaiart
