I FOUND IT GUYS I SPENT HALF AN HOUR LOOKING FOR THIS VIDEO AND ITS HERE
thank
Xuebing Du
Three Goblin Art

if i look back, i am lost
will byers stan first human second
sheepfilms
todays bird

PR's Tumblrdome

titsay
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Sade Olutola
ojovivo
Jules of Nature
Game of Thrones Daily
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Origami Around
One Nice Bug Per Day
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Today's Document

izzy's playlists!

seen from Austria

seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Netherlands
seen from Sweden

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
@thekingofbreakfast
I FOUND IT GUYS I SPENT HALF AN HOUR LOOKING FOR THIS VIDEO AND ITS HERE
thank
Our military is all-volunteer for a reason. Time to end the pretense that we still need Selective Service.
well that didn’t take long
Naturally
What a coincidence that once the lives of women are at risk of being offered a taste of that male privilege then it’s okay to end selective service.
So in my 3D class there’s another kid named Roy, which is my name.
Also in 3D class, we aren’t allowed to listen to music.
So I was talking to our professor and Roy walked by with earbuds in and the professor said “Roy, take those things out of your ears” and I took my hearing aids out of my ears and said “sorry”.
That is the greatest joke I have ever told and no one laughed and I honestly feel so under appreciated rn.
Honestly that joke made being deaf completely worth it and I am an unappreciated comedic genius of my time.
I’m beginning to wonder if people laughed but I just couldn’t hear them
Vincent Van Goku
Hashtag bluekeaton
oh my gosh what is this cuteness!?
Hahaha idk really. Just some book me and slippers found in a bookstore in Shibuya which reminded us of you.
Hashtag bluekeaton
Defining white feminism with one headline.
woooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwww
This cnt be real
http://www.nylon.com/articles/emma-watson-malala-yousafzai-feminist
*raging*
In the interview, Malala said that she was hesitant to identify with the WORD feminism. A dilemma faced by many WOC. Not that she ever had an issue with woman-centered activism…since that’s been her whole public, political life ???
Malala has done more feminist work than Emma Watson will probably ever do. So this is really insulting. And yet, not surprising.
Fucking white feminism is a hell of a drug.
idefk anymore.
That’s rich…
People are losing all sense of perspective and sanity over a stupid, hate-drenched, worn-out word rather than celebrating the agency and achievements of a young woman living with life-threatening oppression. Malala advocates fearlessly for women and girls, always has and always will. Who the fuck cares what she calls herself while she does so? Oh, right, a bloated, ancient movement who cares far more about PR than actual results.
Lambs are never afraid.
People don’t get it. Lambs are not afraid. They don’t miss their moms. People think lambs cry for their moms when they’re on their own, but they don’t. They cry for tit. Or maybe they cry for bigger company. Not their moms. Once you walk one to your side they don’t cry anymore. They don’t cry when you put your knife to their neck. Hardly a whimper when you slice their throat. Some have licked my hand while they bled on the floor. They barely care about being hung upside down, and they’ll be dead before you’re done. It’s not cruel. To them it’s barely uncomfortable. Lambs never understand what’s happening. They’re never afraid. It’s not pretty, but they’re never afraid. Foxes are afraid. They understand, and they don’t want to die. This one was hurt, from a trap that should have killed it. It couldn’t run anymore. It would die in a week. Caranchos would eat its eyes while it was still limping. They do that to lambs as well, but they only do it to foxes when foxes are half-dead. If it had cubs, the rot would call kikes to its burrow. I knew that then too, from my encyclopedias. Kikes jump into your belly and eat you from the inside-out. It was merciful, killing a lamb with a knife to the throat. It would be merciful, killing this fox. My uncle told me to be a man and kill the fox myself. Told me not to be afraid. It would have been mercy, he said. My older cousin wasn’t there, he said. I had my knife, didn’t I? I did have my knife. But fox hide is not like a lamb’s soft throat. It’s wiry, and tough, and smells sour and rotten. I thought I should cut its throat, and managed to hold it, but it thrashed a lot, and my knife wasn’t very good, and my hands were trembling really badly, and I think I held back a lot of strength. I wished the fox wouldn’t be so scared, and I tried to hold it still, and be careful of its wound, and pet it a bit, and help it calm down, but the fox bit me really hard and I dropped my knife, and I dropped the fox, and it hurt its leg worse. It could barely stand now. The bad leg got in the way of its other leg at a weird angle, and it didn’t seem to understand why it had trouble walking. I tried looking at my uncle but didn’t see him. He was probably still watching, I assured myself--but I didn’t see him. I wasn’t crying, I was just breathing hard. My arm hurt where the fox had bitten me, and I didn’t have my knife anymore. But I was being fearless. The fox growled and hissed. They make a sound, like a baby. Like a crying baby. But I hadn’t been able to kill it with my knife. I wished I had been better with a knife. My only other option was my rebenque’s pummel. It was not meant for a kid. In my hands, it looked more like a club. It took a lot of false starts to hit it across the face. But I didn’t put enough strength in the blow. The fox yelped. It didn’t try to run. It didn’t try to growl. It just complained, after I hadn’t killed it. I put both hands on my makeshift club and lifted my arms over my head, and gritted my teeth, and the fox staggered towards my feet, as I tried to be merciful. I recoiled and kicked its nose by accident. I hadn’t meant to. I think I really hurt it, because it fell down. I let it get up and it tried to walk again. It raised its head towards me, but its eyes were closed. I think it was trying to bear its teeth, but it looked more like a grimace. It was trying to growl, I think, but it started wailing instead. Just like a baby. So I hit it again. And I didn’t kill it again. And I hit it again, and it didn’t fall down, and it didn’t stop wailing, and my hand was trembling. And I hit it again, but it was still standing, and I was still not hitting it hard enough, and it was still wailing. And I kept hitting it, with my club, and it kept wailing after each blow, and at some point I noticed its nose was bleeding, and at some point its cries became shorter, and at some point it finally fell down. I looked over my shoulder. My uncle wasn’t there. His truck wasn’t there. My brother, my cousin, my mom; there was no one there. But I was not crying. My face hurt from being stiff, and I found I was kneeling down in front of the fox. And it was bleeding from its mouth and one of its eyes was bulging out. I tried to pet it, and it only recoiled a little, and its pelt was really soft, and I felt like crying, and I thought about my mom, and I thought about mercy, but I had to be fearless, and I didn’t have to cry. The fox was still crying. It had never stopped crying. So I grabbed my club, and I hit it again. And I could hear my mercy even over the wind hitting my face. Not like a lamb at all. Lambs die in silence.
We want to know which issues YOU care about. Take our survey!
if you’re wondering why CNN is biased towards Hillary even though the public seems to agree that Bernie came through last night on multiple fronts heres something interesting
Online media vs online polls
Look at the narrative-spinning of the media! Look at it!
Shameful, and yet shameless.
At least to some extent, the “harassment mob” label was intended to neutralize GamerGate as a voice against progressivist extremism. As one pro-“social justice” blogger wrote with satisfaction, “Ga...
If you will only read one more thing about this tired topic, make it this.
The media is not a conspiracy, it’s just fallible and too often either incompetent or biased. That’s bigger than the whole GG shitfest, for sure, but also very nicely exemplified by the same GG shitfest.
its just super weird that guys are encouraged to push through when women are shhowing they aren’t interested or just are actively showing interest
like guys are supposed to walk up to women who have never given them a second glance
they’re applauded for texting 50 times
and yet here i am feeling weird!! its bullshit I’m asking him out to fentons
Well, I don’t know if we’re *applauded* for texting 50 times. It entirely depends on the outcome, really.
If the other party ended up falling for the dude, then yeah, it’s a nice story of a dude who conquered adversity and fought for love.
If the other party ended up *not* falling for the dude then it can be anything from a “creep-stalker story” women tell their friends to a tumblr post denouncing all men everywhere to a restraining order and a day in court.
TL;DR: Courtship is whack, mang.
i agree with you that courtship is ridiculous
but on lmfao guys are definitely raised to take complete control of a relationship or take the first steps and be persistent
if a woman texts too much or is too eager she’s trying to hard
if a guy does the same thing he’s “persistent” and the woman is told to “give him a chance”
like the reason so many women are in graves or have restraining orders is cause we’re taught ( regardless of whether everyone acts on it ) that a woman is secondary in a relationship with a man lol??
even with all the talk about “sliding in DMs” and cat calling theres always people who are like “ i met my husband when he followed me home from work!” or “ i didn’t like him at first but he just kept trying….”
whereas woman are taught to not push it
In my experience that’s not the case tho. Men are certainly taught to start the interaction (and, indeed, the consensus seems to be that it comes from something beyond social teachings), but any man that’s been at it even a short time learns very quickly “not to push it". That’s where the “wait two days to call her back" myth comes from (it’s a myth because attraction doesn’t really work that way, in my experience).
Disliking needy people is not a man OR woman thing, it’s rather a healthy human thing; however, reaching that point where you know when and where to push or pull the interaction takes a lot of practice, most of which is trial and error.
Most men and women are not bad or toxic, just very clumsy about knowing how to gauge a romantic approach (and often learning), however, most of us wish we were able to live out those cool, rare, “just right” moments that others have managed to (often by sheer luck), so we keep trying to pull them off and often get lost in the attempt.
The thing is, those rare, successful, but risky approaches *are* truly rewarding, that’s not a myth, so those “i didn’t like him but he kept insisting and won me over“ stories are more often than not sincere and rewarding, and they also point to a general bell curve of relationship preferences in both genders.
As you say, most women do wait to be pursued, the same way that most men go for the pursuit, instead of the opposite. I’ve been lucky enough to be on both ends of that experience and, I can assure you, it’s both a lot easier and emotionally safer to be pursued than to pursue. If you’re the one pursuing when you don’t necessarily have to, that’s commendable. It takes guts, and it’s hard, but it’s still very much worth it if you pull it off.
okay so what I’m trying to say is that men are tasked with controlling the momentum in a relationship and therefore they are allowed and encouraged to get away with behavior that is looked down upon in women
and not to say my word is law but in America this is the standard
men ask you out…men propose…..like every level of a relationship is controlled by dudes.
this is not a moral judgement ( though i do judge guys who use this to their advantage )
the “it took time for me to get to like him” is great and all BUT it feeds into this idea that a woman are a game that needs to be won and if she says no it means no(t yet) which is problematic for so many reasons. Guys usually being the pursuers isn’t a coincidence,It’s a social norm. Women are taught to wait for men to seek them out and validate them.
I’m not going to pat people ( of any gender ) on the back for playing the chase game. The idea that being super persistent even when someone says no because YOU want them is so weird!
Even the wording about this like risky, worth it, etc its so off putting.
This has nothing to do with people being ~evil~ or ~toxic~ its just the way we’re conditioned to behave. Of course i expect people to do better, but if you only know how to do something one way…
it has less to do with emotional safety ( though i can assure you being trained to wait for people to pursue you can do a number on your self esteem and being pursued by someone you don’t like/ feel nothing towards can make you feel unsafe. Women feeling worthless if they aren’t being pursued or being given attention by guys is not uncommon) and more to do with power
like my point is that this is a game. Relationships are cute and real love comes out of it but the way its fed to us is like a game. Thats why we have pick up lines and pick up artists, thats why we have “ buy her a drink so she can dance with you” thats why we have books on books sold about how to get the girl
its a game
this isn’t to say that love is a lie or whatever but I’m going to be critical of it because as much “good” as it does it does so much more bad and we need to really examine the “ he knew we’d be together/ he knew me more than i did/ i wasn’t interested in him but he was interested in me and turns our he was right” storyline
examine the fact that guys get “how he gets the girl” movies and girls get “ He’s just not that into you”
i feel like you’re taking this as me attacking men which is ??? okay?? i guess??
but as we move outside of relationships between cishet men and cishet women we see that these dating dynamics are so toxic
we see that people who fall out of this ideal have trouble navigating relationships that don’t follow the guy wants girl + girls is coy and pretends not to like him + guy keeps pushing+ guy finally wins formula
Well, the first thing that I’d point out in response is that, from a man’s pov, it’s women who truly have control the momentum of the relationship, and just play at it being otherwise (if it’s indeed a relationship or hookup). Let me elaborate: No person who pursues a relationship or hookup does so under false pretenses, otherwise it couldn’t really be said to be pursuing either, formally speaking. Even if a person lies about wanting a relationship in order to get a hookup, what that person is honestly doing is looking for a hookup, they’re just dishonest about wanting a relationship. But that’s only marginally related to the point. The main point is that if a dude wants to sleep with a woman, he will try to convince her to sleep with him. Speaking purely as a man who has managed to learn how to attain relationships and successfully get hookups, nearly all of the fun is getting proper consent. Even in a purely selfish, primal, “manly/masculine“ sense, the hot thing for the guy is to get actual consent more than anything else, which is an analysis that doesn’t even take into account that most men are not animals who would not even try to do otherwise simply on the basis of morals and social teachings. With that in mind, it truly does look like it’s the woman who is in power of the interaction. If she says no and is adamant and clear about the no, then that’s it, you “failed” as a pursuer. Only *some* would be dicks about it--probably depending on how far they think they had gotten before the “no” (say, the difference between getting a no before the first kiss or getting the no after getting naked together)--but even then, it’s only them being petty, it’s not them having any real power over the interaction (in fact, if you want to be mean it would be easy to argue that it’s them lashing out at their self-admitted lack of virility, rather than the opposite). Make no mistake tho, this kind of petty behavior is looked down upon by men as well. You’re not a “stud" for scaring women away, or for complaining they’re all this or that for not sleeping with you, or for being a shithead about those who do sleep with you, you’re a “stud” for getting them to sleep with you of their own free will and doing so with certain ease. You’re even more of a stud for getting them to sleep with you without you even asking--just look at rock stars and how many men would like to be rock stars. That’s why it’s not “hot“ or “studly“ to pay for a prostitute, and why it’s a common joke amongst men to say that the guy who was a loser in high school and made a show of coming with a hot girl to the reunion actually paid for her to come with him.
I agree with you that, in a sense, it can look on women as game (though I’d argue that experienced women can also look on men as game, though it’s a game that’s caught differently); but I’d argue that, even if you want to grant that stance, it’s just incidental. It’s not that “women“ are the game but, rather, that the “pursued“ are game (which makes sense since it’s “game” that you pursue). It just so happens that in a sexually reproductive species with different levels of parental investment like homo sapiens are, women are more likely to be “pursued” than men are. At the same time, I wouldn’t grant that all women are passive in this endeavor but, rather, that the form of “pursuit” that many women take is contingent on being perceived as being pursued, even if they’re actively attempting a form of oblique pursuit themselves. This is why “playing coy” has its place but must also at some time stop. The proper gauging of that moment is where the challenge lies.
I also agree with you that it’s no coincidence that men are most often pursuers and women are most often pursued (as I thought I’d suggested with my bell curve comment); as I hinted above, I’d disagree in that it’s socially taught: it’s most likely biologically driven and socially reinforced. I do not think there’s much we can do about it in that sense. I don’t necessarily disagree with you that it can be toxic or troublesome, but I also *would* disagree with you if you’re trying to argue that *most of the time* it would be.
I don’t disagree that it *can* be about power. However, I very much disagree that it’s as one-sided as you seem to be suggesting, since both parties could very well be said to have a non-negligible amount of power over the other. I’ve been in relationships that have been about power, but I’ve also been in relationships which have been about surrendering almost every bit of power.
Also, I don’t disagree with you that it’s filled with unfair, inscrutable obstacles that make everything harder for everyone (and that may make both women and men bitter/unhappy/depressed about it, if for different reasons), but that’s a rather tragic reality of our limited material bodies and language, more than anything else. There’s also time windows to take into account, as well as limit cases and the like. Healthy relationships are pretty damn hard for everyone--not just those who don’t conform to the “cishet paradigm”, as you put it--in no small part because it takes a healthy state of mind for it to work, and it’s not that easy to be in a healthy state of mind for anyone, really. In this and other senses, making a romantic approach truly work (and, furthermore, stick) is a matter that *depends* on unpredictable coincidences, so it will always find a zillion blunders.
Lastly, I don’t know if you’re attacking men or not, and I didn’t answer with that in mind, honestly. I just wanted to delve deeper into it with the privilege of an interloper whose opinion on these things I didn’t necessarily know beforehand, but I did feel like you were putting an unfair burden of responsibility on “pursuers” rather than “pursued”, which I don’t think is fair to either. No pursuer can catch a pursued that doesn’t want to be caught, the same way that no pursued can entice a pursuer that doesn't want to pursue, and there can be an entire universe of completely opaque reasons (for either subjects) as for why this might be the unfortunate case, but none of them will know until they try their best attempt at it (and a newbie at it has a different idea of what “best attempt” means than someone who has been at it for longer: this is where you get your “50 messages a day” pursuers or your “show up at your house uninvited” pursued). In this sense, it’s like jokes: you can’t know if a joke will be found funny until you try it, but if the joke’s not funny, by the time you know it’s not funny it’s too late. So is the case for pursuers who don’t know when to stop, or pursued who don’t know when not to play it coy.
TL;DR: Courtship is whack, mang. And it’s full of communication mishaps and confusing, unhelpful, dramatically static paradigms--that nonetheless do not exist without reason. None of this will ever stop people from trying tho and, most importantly, it *can* be navigated, with enough experience, so we should try to be understanding of those who are honestly, if clumsily, attempting to learn.
its just super weird that guys are encouraged to push through when women are shhowing they aren’t interested or just are actively showing interest
like guys are supposed to walk up to women who have never given them a second glance
they’re applauded for texting 50 times
and yet here i am feeling weird!! its bullshit I’m asking him out to fentons
Well, I don’t know if we’re *applauded* for texting 50 times. It entirely depends on the outcome, really.
If the other party ended up falling for the dude, then yeah, it’s a nice story of a dude who conquered adversity and fought for love.
If the other party ended up *not* falling for the dude then it can be anything from a “creep-stalker story” women tell their friends to a tumblr post denouncing all men everywhere to a restraining order and a day in court.
TL;DR: Courtship is whack, mang.
i agree with you that courtship is ridiculous
but on lmfao guys are definitely raised to take complete control of a relationship or take the first steps and be persistent
if a woman texts too much or is too eager she’s trying to hard
if a guy does the same thing he’s “persistent” and the woman is told to “give him a chance”
like the reason so many women are in graves or have restraining orders is cause we’re taught ( regardless of whether everyone acts on it ) that a woman is secondary in a relationship with a man lol??
even with all the talk about “sliding in DMs” and cat calling theres always people who are like “ i met my husband when he followed me home from work!” or “ i didn’t like him at first but he just kept trying….”
whereas woman are taught to not push it
In my experience that’s not the case tho. Men are certainly taught to start the interaction (and, indeed, the consensus seems to be that it comes from something beyond social teachings), but any man that’s been at it even a short time learns very quickly “not to push it". That’s where the “wait two days to call her back" myth comes from (it’s a myth because attraction doesn’t really work that way, in my experience).
Disliking needy people is not a man OR woman thing, it’s rather a healthy human thing; however, reaching that point where you know when and where to push or pull the interaction takes a lot of practice, most of which is trial and error.
Most men and women are not bad or toxic, just very clumsy about knowing how to gauge a romantic approach (and often learning), however, most of us wish we were able to live out those cool, rare, “just right” moments that others have managed to (often by sheer luck), so we keep trying to pull them off and often get lost in the attempt.
The thing is, those rare, successful, but risky approaches *are* truly rewarding, that’s not a myth, so those “i didn’t like him but he kept insisting and won me over“ stories are more often than not sincere and rewarding, and they also point to a general bell curve of relationship preferences in both genders.
As you say, most women do wait to be pursued, the same way that most men go for the pursuit, instead of the opposite. I’ve been lucky enough to be on both ends of that experience and, I can assure you, it’s both a lot easier and emotionally safer to be pursued than to pursue. If you’re the one pursuing when you don’t necessarily have to, that’s commendable. It takes guts, and it’s hard, but it’s still very much worth it if you pull it off.
its just super weird that guys are encouraged to push through when women are shhowing they aren’t interested or just are actively showing interest
like guys are supposed to walk up to women who have never given them a second glance
they’re applauded for texting 50 times
and yet here i am feeling weird!! its bullshit I’m asking him out to fentons
Well, I don’t know if we’re *applauded* for texting 50 times. It entirely depends on the outcome, really.
If the other party ended up falling for the dude, then yeah, it’s a nice story of a dude who conquered adversity and fought for love.
If the other party ended up *not* falling for the dude then it can be anything from a "creep-stalker story" women tell their friends to a tumblr post denouncing all men everywhere to a restraining order and a day in court.
TL;DR: Courtship is whack, mang.