I need help understanding difference between peragender, maverique and ilyagender. I get that aporagender/aliagender is an umbrella term for genders that are not male, female, in-between of two nor an absence of gender, but I don't get the difference between mav, pera and ilya
hi! sorry it took me so long to get to this question.
the unsatisfying answer is that it's ultimately semantics. and that's not to dismiss people who identify as one of these but not the others, because the semantics and what each term emphasises matter to people.
maverique is defined as a gender that has nothing to do with male/masculine, female/feminine and neutral while not being genderless. the term is based on maverick, which describes unbranded cattle, i.e. cattle that don't have their owner's mark) or
a person who thinks and acts in an independent way, often behaving differently from the expected or usual way
maverique in its name really emphasises a gender that exists outside of conventional ideas of gender.
ilyagender is defined as a gender that isn't male, female, neutral, agender in anyway and also not being a combination of or derivation from them. it's worth noting that ilyagender was coined only 6 months after maverique. a lot of people coined similar terms in 2014 (including apora and alia). one supposed difference between ilyagender and maverique i've seen people talk about is that ilyagender specified that it's not related to neutrality, whereas maverique doesn't specify that. in reality, queerascat, who coined maverique, used slightly different wordings often when they defined maverique for someone who asked, sometimes explicitly stating it has "nothing to do with neutrality", sometimes just saying "it's not male, female, neutral or genderless", also not specifying whether or not it's related to male and female etc. looking at their stuff, it becomes clear that they coined maverique almost as an opposite of neutral (saying things like "it leaves no room for apathy or neutrality" in one of their earlier definitions), and that "not neutral" means "not neutral in anyway, not related to it". the person who coined ilyagender said they consider this gender to be separate from maverique, but still a cousin. but they also talked about how a lot of terms are synonyms that feel different from each other, i'm not sure where this leaves us. "ilya" comes from "il y a" which is french for "there is" or "there exists". the name really emphasises a presence of gender.
it's worth noting that these two terms were quite explicitly coined to describe the coiner themself, and were then picked up by people who found the terms useful. i think this is how we end up with some terms that have differences that feel very nebulous to an outsider, because they are very personal to the person who created the term.
péra is defined as not being a part of or related to the gender trinary of male/female/none (or sometimes neutral). it is unfortunately based on the harmful concept of the gender trinary, a concept so utterly useless that the coiner themself didn't even know what the third category of the "trinary" is. i think term can be redeemed though if we only use the second and longer wording of the definition, which describes péra as not at all female, male, androgynous or neutral, while also not being a lack of gender, confusion about or apathy towards one's gender. it's similar to maverique and ilyagender, but péra is the only term of the three that explicitly specifies that it's *not* confusion, a less nebulous difference i can point to. péra comes from greek and means "beyond".
so tbh, mostly the differences are what you make them. technically all three of these terms apply to me, but i only use maverique for myself. maverique is the first term i found (in fact, péra wasn't coined until after i had already established my identity as maverique), it has the flag i like most, i just like the term and history the most. but it might have gone differently if i found another term first.