
seen from Japan
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from Belarus
seen from Ukraine

seen from Australia
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China
i just discovered this gorgeous progress flag design by FlailingSpade and was inspired to build upon it
the colorblind and photosensitive friendly color scheme comes from the star of david progress flag by dykeboytism
both of these flags will be placed under the read more just in case either link ends up not working
id like to think of this as the sunrise progress flag : >
DON'T PUT YOUR TRIGGERS AND/OR PHOBIAS IN YOUR WEBSITES/PINNED POSTS/BIOS/ETC. FOR EVERYONE ON THE INTERNET TO SEE. ONLY TRUSTED PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW THAT INFORMATION, NOT THE WHOLE INTERNET. YOU WILL GET HURT!!! MEAN PEOPLE WILL USE IT AGAINST YOU!!!
"I don't like to call myself this umbrella term, therefore this umbrella term is a form of oppression" is a surprisingly common narrative that doesn't make any sense.
Example:
"I am agender, but don't want to be called non-binary" - thats fine. You don't have to call yourself non-binary.
However, when you say "I am agender and I don't like to call myself non-binary. Therefore, being agender doesn't fall under the non-binary umbrella, and if you say it does, you are being bigoted" is completely illogical.
Agender is a lack of gender. The non-binary umbrella includes any gender (or lack thereof) that is not exclusively monogendered woman or monogendered man. Therefore, agender falls under the non-binary umbrella.
You do not have to identify as non-binary personally, but the umbrella term still includes agenderness because it fits under the definition of the umbrella.
Another example:
"I have PCOS, but don't want to be called intersex" - again, fine. But "I have PCOS, and I don't want to call myself intersex, therefore PCOS doesn't fall under the intersex umbrella" is illogical.
You can be uncomfortable with using an umbrella term label for yourself. But insisting that it's somehow oppressive that your identity/experience is categorized under an umbrella term doesn't make any sense.
"Its illegal to be straight during pride month!"
"If you think hateful thoughts about yourself, and you're queer, that's queerphobic, and it's illegal to be queerphobic during pride month!"
How about we not make straight queers* feel guilty and paranoid about being "not queer enough" during pride month? (*Aspec straights, trans & gender diverse straights, intersex straights, lesbihets, turihets, m-specs straights, polyamorous hets, nonrose hets, etc, etc, etc?)
How about we not make people with internalized queerphobia feel guilty for intrusive thoughts?
How about we stop making a billion posts encouraging moral OCD during pride month?
[PT: How about we stop making a billion posts encouraging moral OCD during pride month? /End PT]
*gripping my hands so hard on a young trans persons shoulders that their bones are about to break*
do not log on to 4chan.com. do not get involved in passing olympics. you will always lose. do not put afab/amab* in your bio, that is cisgender society trying to know your “real” gender. you do not exist to please cisgender people. there is no ‘right’ way to be trans. learn your goddamn history, listen to your elders. listen to other disenfranchised groups. listen to intersex people and check yourself for intersexism. listen to trans poc and check yourself for racism. listen to disabled people and check yourself for ableism. be open to learning always. labels are meant to fit you, not the other way around. you are not weird or predatory for simply being attracted to others. you’re fine if you’re not a skinny white twink or a barbie doll. you’re fine if your body is ‘weird’. you’re fine if you don’t have heavy or any dysphoria. it’s okay if you actually don’t want to transition or anything like that. life is worth living at any stage, you deserve to be happy. I SWEAR THAT YOU ARE OKAY!!!!!
*ok editing this bc i think there are some major misunderstandings here and also ignorance on my part so lemme clear the air. when i wrote “don’t put tme/tma” in ur bio i did NOT mean to say that discussions around transmisogyny aren’t important or that tme/tma cannot be helpful terminology, and i’m super sorry that it came off that way. also editing bc someone pointed out to me that the original phrasing of this post is very misinforming, so to also clarify, tme/tma was a term invented by transfems to talk about transfeminine experiences which i will admit that i was unfamiliar with the history of tme/tma as a term and was introduced to it through some really bad online queer discourse. but it’s always been of my opinion that discussion around all forms of bigotry, including transmisogyny, are important and need to be had. i explained in a rb, which i’ll link when i have more time, that my issue was with the way the term is used as only identification/oppression olympics rather than genuine nuanced discussion about the ways that transphobia/transmisogyny/transandrophobia/etc function and interact with each other. i advised young trans people to not put tma/tme in their bios, bc i know that the wrong people (not just cis people, but transphobes and assholes who just want to get under your skin) would use any indication of your direction of transition to try and misgender you. or specifically in the case of tma/tme, tell you that your experiences/thoughts are not valid or reasonable bc you were tma or tma.
i realize how not originally clarifying that makes me look stupid (and a transmisogynist), so seriously, i’m sorry for that major mishap. tma/tme are not inherently bad words and you are 1000% allowed to use whatever terminology fits you and your experiences best. so as another word of advice: please do not let some rando on the internet tell you how you should talk about your experiences
(also idgaf if you don’t “log on” to 4chan or that it’s “not a website”, the fact that any of you know that is shameful and upsetting)
something I'd like to say..
i dont care if someone's preferred pronouns bring you discomfort, use them or dont talk about them or interact with them.
"but indi! it/its pronouns are dehumanizi-"
NOPE! i dont care!
"but, this person goes by he/him but dresses femininely-"
so? is it actually hurting you?
"but neopronouns are hurting the trans communi-"
transphobes and terfs are hurting the trans community!