Pulpit, Pussy, Pulpit: A life history.Â
In retrospect, the columnist ought to have known better than to keep up his comical writing style in what otherwise was a totally serious newspaper. The column title would barely make it out of SNLâs staff room, much less appear on the Boston Globe, editor though he was. Wasting his Ivy League education and his major in human rights to venture into the realm of comedy was low blow enough; wasting his employment at one of the premiere newspapers in the country to create a pun of sexual variety was all the more. By no means was Garrett Alcott bad at his job, far from it, but his battle with sheer boredom proved to be going downhill. Many people, especially his colleagues and part of his staff, had oft told him that he was unfit for the office life. He was far too active, far too vibrant for a desk job. But words were his weapon of choice, and heâd wielded it with such ferocity and expertise that their complaints were all for naught soon as he submitted his works and edited his staffâs own.
Approaching the managing editorâs office, his steps growing heavier with each passing step, he attempted to understand why he couldnât find his name at the editorial section that day. Sure, his title needed a little revision, though what he lacked in his title he had made up for in his columnâs sheer excellence, going so far as to have done overtime as a means to finish it. Rarely was it that Garrett Alcott faced rejection that when the occasion presented itself, the rage seething through his veins did not fall short. It was almost even excessive. If there was a word to perfectly encapsulate what the famed columnist was feeling that day, it was that of pettiness. After all, it was only a 760-word columnâand his name still appeared in the editorial board. Not that his complaint would do anythingâfar from it, really, considering Nadia Crane hated his gutsâbut damned if he was going to let this slide. He wouldnât go without a fight, that much was certain.Â
He did not even bother to knock before entering her office which was admittedly more expansive than his own. âI need a reason,â he replied succinctly, scowling as he did so. Raking his fingers through his hair and not even attempting to hide the annoyance in his features, he added, âthisââ he held out a bond paper containing the final draft of his column, of a Bostonian priest rejoining the clergy after his wifeâs death, ââis one of the better pieces Iâve written this month. Heck, this year. I think I deserve an explanation why you replaced it with Mr. Murrayâs work.â Ah, Murray, the bane of his existence. Heâd skin and burn him if Garrett had the chance. âYou ought to publish this at a later issue. Or at the online site. Either way, Iâm not going to let this be scrapped.â Â
âWell how about you close the door and take a seat.â She responded coolly before she took a deep, exaggerated breath and motioned her hand toward the chair in front of her desk for him to take a seat, anticipating that this conversation may last a minute. She wasnât unreasonable, she may not have gone easy on Garrett at all but if anything she didnât stack the odds against him either. She was professional and did her best to maintain that streak, despite how much Garrett could get on her nerves. She wasnât quick to anger but she did have a hardness to her that still made people not want to see what her bad side was like.Â
She leaned back in her seat as he handed out the paper toward her and reached out to take it. She had anticipated that heâd come to complain about being left out of the last edition and it only annoyed her that he wouldnât suck it up and move on. She was a rather respected woman in the field and a former columnist that had won rewards that recognized her talent and even she, the talented and hard working Nadia Crane, had been left out of the newspaper during her days as a columnist on several occasions. She didnât complain about it, she just did better next time and tried not to let it happen again. âI chose Murrayâs column over yours because itâs a better fit for the publication.â She answered. âYour column wasnât bad but I liked Murrayâs better. Did you read it?â She asked tilting her head to the side. âIt was interesting and informative about the economy here in Boston. Yours was satirical and while I did enjoy it I thought Murrayâs was more wells suited for the last edition we put out.â She explained, easily answering his question without a shred of guilt or sympathy. Their profession required the ability to accept criticism and it wasnât even as though she was insulting him or his column, it was just as simple as Murrayâs was the one she liked more.
âLook in this industry you arenât always going to win and as long as Iâm your managing editor I donât give handouts to anyone. I include your columns when I like them and think their a good fit for that edition and youâll need to learn to accept the times that I donât.â She said before looking back down briefly at the paper, rolling her eyes at the title again as she had the first time she read it, then set it aside to read later. She would consider posting it to the website but not until after coming up with a new title.