Psyko's trash acc.

This blog is USELES!

[saiykik]

Princess 2B

[gramdraw]

Midna but her markings are clothes

[bonesmarinated]

Edgerunner street style 

[the-punforgiven]

Show up at work like hi boss sorry I'm late my I was helping my mother track down one specific 90s dungeon crawler for the purposes of obtaining a muffin recipe the developer hid in the files

[the-punforgiven]

Anyway shoutout to Stonekeep (1995)

[mushroomsandteeth]

I'M MAKING THE MUFFINS

[mushroomsandteeth]

Burnt my hand picking it up to show. Gonna wait to taste.

[mushroomsandteeth]

Taste review: Make the video game muffins oh my GOD.

[knightjockey]

These are DELICIOUS! I substituted chocolate chips for pecans because its what i had on hand.

It tastes like a pumpkin gingerbread cake! Great treat for fall and winter!

Definitely make these!

[sadhoc]

Text from recipe

Tim Cain's Chocolate Chip Pumpkin Muffins -- They're the shadow king's favorite!

1 and 2/3 cup flour

2 tsp cinnamon

1/4 tsp cloves

1/4 tsp baking powder

2 eggs

1 cup chocolate chips

1 cup sugar

1 tsp nutmeg

1 tsp baking soda

1/4 tsp salt

1 cup pumpkin (half of a 16 oz can)

1/2 cup (one stick) butter, melted

preheat oven to 350. grease muffin tins (one dozen regular size) or use baking cups. mix flour, sugar, cinnamon, nutmeg, cloves, baking powder, baking soda and salt in a large bowl. Break eggs into another bowl. add pumpkin and butter and whisk until blended. stir in chocolate chips. pour over dry ingredients and stir until just blended. do NOT overstir! scoop batter into tins and bake 20-25 minutes. after cooling, keep muffins wrapped in plastic to avoid drying.

[knightofleo]

[special-lucky-chosen-one]

all the photos of him are like this, I love that this guy understood he had been born with the face of a wizard or axe murderer and just leaned fully into it

[special-lucky-chosen-one]

he knew EXACTLY what he was doing

[times-chu]

[boingmann]

he got what he wanted

Also

[yamujiburo]

inspired by

[penguicorns-are-cool]

DO NOT DO THIS!!!

If a website has a paywall, like New York Times, DO NOT use the ctrl+A shortcut then the ctrl+c shortcut as fast as you can because then you may accidentally copy the entire article before the paywall comes up. And definitely don't do ctrl+v into the next google doc or whatever you open because then you will accidentally paste the entire article into a google doc or something!!!! I repeat DO NOT do this because it is piracy which is absolutely totally wrong!!!

[charlignon]

Also do NOT append "12ft.io/" before a URL ! Typing an URL like this https://12ft.io/<URL> will redirect to a site that would break the display of the page by removing the paywall !

[cinoclexity]

Honestly it's kind of prohibited to mash CTRL+P before some paywall windows can load in to get a PDF of the article. Really shouldn't be done tbh very dangerous🤷🏿‍♂️ ❌️

[genericpuff]

[yamujiburo]

b00b69

[askbananapie]

HELP!! EMERGENCY RENT FUND

I could really use some financial help right now. I have no mony, no food, and no way to pay my rent. Could someone/anyone help me out? Please share or help if you can. I’m sorry this year, things have just kind of fallen apart in my life

If you have anything to spare, it would help a lot.

Go to paypal.me/askbanannpie and type in the amount. Since it’s PayPal, it's easy and secure. Don’t have a PayPal account? No worries.

[nestedneons]

That old @1kami post that everyone of you is missing

Cyberpunk commissions

LoFi commissions

[askflutterbitch]

Gives u a banan. Hey new friend

[dummy-dot-exe]

スーパー ハイスクール ガール！ by ペトス@sunoco600

[veryfunnymemes]

[aromoji]

Won’t that only solve 75% of your problems?

[queenophydea]

[aromoji]

The book solves half of your problems, not all of them

Say you have 8 problems. You read the book, and you have 4 problems. You read the book again gets rid of HALF, of those 4 problems. So you’re left with two. Out of the 8 problems, 6 were resolved and 6/8 is 75%.

[augie279-deactivated20191219]

Finally Tumblr can do math

[avatar-of-the-vast]

So, what you’re saying, is that if I buy infinite books, I will solve all of my problems, because the sum as n approaches infinity starting at 1 of (½)^n equals 1, which would be 100% of my problems.

[acesian]

No, you will only ever be able to become infinitely close to solving all of your problems, like this:

[queenophydea]

Please stop explaining math to me im gay

[yorksilk]

[quecksilvereyes]

that’s why radioactive material is such a bitch! it only ever deteriorates relative to its mass so it will never completely vanish

[the-dracologist]

This post is pushing me to the limit

[endgameexecutor]

[sophie-baybey]

Assuming this book is an SCP-like object with paranormal properties that causes its contents to shift based on how many problems the reader has, it may be possible to open both books at the same time and record both of their contents, thus giving answers towards solving all of the reader’s problems. This is only theoretical however, as we have no way of knowing how the book conceptualizes the reader’s problems, whether the answers are given upon purchase of the book, upon opening it initially, on a page-by-page basis, or something else entirely. I believe this post warrants further study.

[chongoblog]

I agree that further study is needed, seeing how this hypothesis also implies that opening two books simultaneously will solve two separate halfs. I would theorize that opening both simultaneously would yield two randomly selected groups of 50% of problems, which means that the theoretical average would have 25% of problems solved in book A, 25% of problems solved in book B, and 25% solved in both books, being overlapping problems.

So hypothetically if you were to instigate the two books’ problem-solving prowess at different times (depending on what triggers the solving of problems, of course), then you would get a definitive 75% (50% of problems with book A, half of the remaining with book B) However if you were to trigger them simultaneously, you would get a random chance of the books solving 50-100% of your problems. So the method of simultaneous or asynchronous book opening is dependend on how lucky you’re feeling

But thats merely my hypothesis. I agree. Further experimentation required

[veryfunnymemes]

[aromoji]

Won’t that only solve 75% of your problems?

[queenophydea]

[aromoji]

The book solves half of your problems, not all of them

Say you have 8 problems. You read the book, and you have 4 problems. You read the book again gets rid of HALF, of those 4 problems. So you’re left with two. Out of the 8 problems, 6 were resolved and 6/8 is 75%.

[augie279-deactivated20191219]

Finally Tumblr can do math

[avatar-of-the-vast]

So, what you’re saying, is that if I buy infinite books, I will solve all of my problems, because the sum as n approaches infinity starting at 1 of (½)^n equals 1, which would be 100% of my problems.

[acesian]

No, you will only ever be able to become infinitely close to solving all of your problems, like this:

[queenophydea]

Please stop explaining math to me im gay

[yorksilk]

[quecksilvereyes]

that’s why radioactive material is such a bitch! it only ever deteriorates relative to its mass so it will never completely vanish

[the-dracologist]

This post is pushing me to the limit

[endgameexecutor]

[sophie-baybey]

Assuming this book is an SCP-like object with paranormal properties that causes its contents to shift based on how many problems the reader has, it may be possible to open both books at the same time and record both of their contents, thus giving answers towards solving all of the reader’s problems. This is only theoretical however, as we have no way of knowing how the book conceptualizes the reader’s problems, whether the answers are given upon purchase of the book, upon opening it initially, on a page-by-page basis, or something else entirely. I believe this post warrants further study.

[chongoblog]

I agree that further study is needed, seeing how this hypothesis also implies that opening two books simultaneously will solve two separate halfs. I would theorize that opening both simultaneously would yield two randomly selected groups of 50% of problems, which means that the theoretical average would have 25% of problems solved in book A, 25% of problems solved in book B, and 25% solved in both books, being overlapping problems.

So hypothetically if you were to instigate the two books’ problem-solving prowess at different times (depending on what triggers the solving of problems, of course), then you would get a definitive 75% (50% of problems with book A, half of the remaining with book B) However if you were to trigger them simultaneously, you would get a random chance of the books solving 50-100% of your problems. So the method of simultaneous or asynchronous book opening is dependend on how lucky you’re feeling

But thats merely my hypothesis. I agree. Further experimentation required

[advosart]

Tinkaton my beloved

[izzetasignet]

@demilypyro

[deadslugart]

The cactus witch

[squeakyart]

Glomi's mimic magic