The civilizations of ancient Mesopotamia, including the Sumerians and Akkadians, were deeply rooted in the belief that all of life, from birth to death, was shaped by the gods' will. The Mesopotamians held a profound respect for fate, a concept they believed was unchangeable and dictated by divine powers. This worldview, deeply embedded in their religion, mythology, and daily life, centered on the acceptance of fate—whether for better or worse—and the acknowledgment that human beings had little control over the grand design set forth by the gods. Through their mythology, omens, prayers, and rituals, Mesopotamians sought to understand their place within the divine plan, striving to harmonize their lives with cosmic order.
In both Sumerian and Akkadian societies, the concept of fate was expressed through terms like šīmtu (Akkadian) and NAM (Sumerian), which signified destiny or a divine decree. The Mesopotamians viewed fate not as something malleable by human will but as a fixed outcome decreed by the gods. Once set, fate was largely beyond alteration, with humans expected to accept whatever was destined for them—whether fortune or disaster. Fate, therefore, encompassed the dual possibilities of life: prosperity and suffering, wealth and poverty, health and death. The neutrality of the term reflects that fate, like the gods themselves, could be benevolent or harsh, but it was always beyond the control of mere mortals.
The attitude of "for better or worse" was not just a philosophical acceptance but a central tenet of the Mesopotamian understanding of life. Life’s outcomes were governed by divine forces, and it was the role of humans to live in accordance with their decreed fate, recognizing that they had little power to change it. This perspective closely mirrors modern expressions like "it will be what it will be," emphasizing the inevitability of fate.
In Mesopotamian mythology, fate was often viewed as being decreed by the gods, particularly by those with supreme authority, such as Anu, Enlil, and Marduk. Anu, the father of the gods in Sumerian tradition, was seen as the ultimate arbiter of divine decrees, while Enlil, the god of storms, frequently played a direct role in determining the fate of cities and nations. Marduk, in Babylonian tradition, took on the role of establishing order after his victory over Tiamat, symbolizing the god’s power to decree the fate of the universe itself.
In the Enuma Elish, Marduk's victory over chaos represents not just the triumph of order over disorder but the establishment of a divine authority that controls the fates of gods and humans alike. Fate in Mesopotamia was not something that humans could escape or alter, even through their rituals and prayers; rather, it was determined in divine assemblies where gods decided the future of individuals, cities, and even the cosmos. This divine control over fate was absolute, reinforcing the Mesopotamian understanding that human beings were subject to the whims of a higher power, for better or worse.
The Mesopotamians placed great importance on divination and omens to interpret the will of the gods and foresee their decreed fate. Divination practices were crucial to their society, as they believed that the gods communicated their intentions through celestial signs, natural phenomena, and even the behavior of animals. Astrology, for example, was a prominent method of interpreting the gods' will, with the movements of the stars and planets offering insight into the future.
However, while divination provided a glimpse into one’s destiny, it did not offer a means to escape fate. Priests and kings would use these omens to prepare for what was to come but understood that even with this foreknowledge, the outcome remained in the hands of the gods. This acknowledgment of the futility in attempting to change fate is deeply resonant with the idea of "it will be what it will be." While humans could attempt to mitigate the harshness of their destiny through rituals and offerings, the larger arc of fate remained beyond their control.
The Epic of Gilgamesh, one of the oldest and most famous pieces of Mesopotamian literature, offers a profound reflection on the human desire to overcome fate and the ultimate realization that death and destiny are inescapable. Gilgamesh, after the death of his close companion Enkidu, embarks on a quest to find immortality, driven by the fear of his own mortality. His journey is marked by encounters with gods and mortals who reveal to him the futility of trying to escape his fate.
Despite his heroic efforts, Gilgamesh ultimately fails to secure eternal life and returns to Uruk, where he finally accepts his mortal destiny. This narrative mirrors the Mesopotamian understanding that fate is inescapable and that even kings, who are part-divine, must submit to the will of the gods. Fate, in this sense, is not just a decree of life or death but a fundamental law of the universe that all beings, divine and human alike, must accept.
While fate was seen as largely immutable, Mesopotamians did believe in the power of rituals and prayers to win favor with the gods and possibly alter the course of minor aspects of their lives, such as health or prosperity. Rituals like the Mīs Pî (washing of the mouth) were performed to invoke divine intervention or establish a direct connection with the gods. However, these rituals were not designed to alter the larger fate decreed by the gods but rather to seek mercy or mitigation of immediate suffering.
Prayers to deities like Shamash (the god of justice) or Marduk often took the form of appeals for protection, health, and prosperity. Yet, even these prayers acknowledged that the gods’ will was supreme and that human intervention could only go so far. This approach is consistent with the attitude of resignation reflected in the phrase “for better or worse”: while rituals and prayers were acts of faith and hope, they were also acknowledgments of the limits of human power in the face of divine will.
The lamentation texts of Mesopotamia provide further evidence of the deep-rooted belief in fate and the acceptance of divine will. These texts, which mourn the destruction of cities or the suffering of individuals, often attribute disasters to the withdrawal of divine favor. The Lament for the Destruction of Ur, for instance, expresses the city’s devastation as the will of the gods, a fate decreed despite the righteousness of its people.
These lamentations reveal that the Mesopotamians viewed both fortune and misfortune as part of the natural order, determined by the gods and beyond the influence of human effort. The destruction of cities or the death of kings was seen as part of the divine plan, further reinforcing the idea that humans must accept their fate, for better or worse, as a part of the grand cosmic design.
In Sumerian belief, the concept of Me represented the divine decrees or principles that governed all aspects of life. These decrees were believed to originate from the gods and dictated everything from kingship to agriculture. Humans, and even the gods, were bound by these cosmic laws, which ensured the order of the universe. Fate, as decreed by the gods, was thus an extension of Me, ensuring that the world followed a divine plan.
To deviate from these decrees or attempt to alter fate was to invite chaos into the world. The Mesopotamians, therefore, viewed their lives as intertwined with the divine will, and their rituals and prayers were acts of submission to this higher order. Acceptance of fate was not just a personal matter but a cosmic one, ensuring the balance of the universe.
šīmtu ūbilšu- fate took him away
ana šīmtišu illik- he went to his fate
Šumma ina ūmēšu- what wiibe will be
There are two destinies; the Mutable and the Fixed. The fixed destiny is those factors of life that cannot be altered such as who your parents are, when and where you were born, the color of your eyes, your gender and so on.
The Mutable destiny is that which your eternal soul requested from 'God' prior to your birth. This requested life path can be found and harmonized with, or it can be missed. Our death is included in the mutable destiny, because while our time of death was ordained, our actions can lead us to die early. If one finds and lives their destiny, they will make it to the appointed hour of death and thus complete this lives destiny. In theory having done so will cause them to learn lessons that will help them to evolve as a eternal soul. You will find that this ideal of spiritual evolution did not develope until late in Assyria's existence. Earlier it was thought that the person decended to the underworld eternaly. Later through Median, Persian, and Indian influences brought into play by the world empires of the Persians and Macedonians, reincarnation and 'evolution of being' entered the popular mind set.Theurgy sat down hip to hip with Thaumaturgy until the popularity of christian and muslim faiths subdued it as a 'sin'.