Valerie a týden divu (Valerie and Her Week of Wonders), 1970. Dir. Jaromil Jires
Keni

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
No title available
wallacepolsom

Kiana Khansmith
ojovivo
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

@theartofmadeline
Claire Keane
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
RMH
No title available
occasionally subtle

#extradirty

izzy's playlists!
Sade Olutola
Misplaced Lens Cap
trying on a metaphor
seen from Canada
seen from China
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Canada
@demonprincex
Valerie a týden divu (Valerie and Her Week of Wonders), 1970. Dir. Jaromil Jires
astounded by this comment on the r/facefuck subreddit. shrimp tool.
happy shrimp tool shthursday
they gotta put all their eggs in the "male socialization" basket cause some trans women don't even have the body parts they fearmonger about but they still want to control them
like at this point in the like... 10+ years trans women have been a go-to wedge issue, everyone knows how chromosomes don't necessarily determine phenotype, everyone knows bottom surgery exists, everyone knows intersex people exist, everyone knows some people don't even produce gametes at all, everyone knows we don't stop calling cis women women after a hysterectomy or sterilization
the well of bioessentialist arguments is starting to run dry cause everyone knows the facts that disprove them. so they've had to greatly exaggerate how socialization works and how immutable it is cause what the hell else are they gonna do, lol
oh btw your entire substack/medium is blocked in australia without age verification lmfao
dont think i can do anything about that im afraid. but it's all on substack for free! drdevonprice.substack.com !
my latest rewatch of IWTV really woke it up for me with what Lestat must be going through, and lowkey made me a Lestat apologist.
He offers Louis the chance to remove himself from the shackles of society, and to absolve himself of all the mortal responsibilities which so clearly weigh upon Louis.
Louis accepts, is turned, and then never absolves himself of said responsibilities. Lestat patiently waits, plays along, and entertains himself while waiting for Louis. They have eternity, he can wait a few decades until Louis' mortal ties slowly fade away.
But then Claudia. He turns her and suddenly Louis has an immortal tie to his mortal life. Louis can put all the importance he found in mortality into that relationship and, since she's immortal, Lestat will be waiting forever.
So Lestat continues to wait, but grows more and more frustrated. And from there, everything falls out. But through all the drama, he waits for Louis. Still waiting for Louis to absolve himself of the burdens of mortal life. To release himself and be free.
God Lestat is so down bad and just wants the best for his sweet baby angel and I'm so about it. Need me a freak like that.
oh my goddd I am so 100% with you until you get to the Claudia piece, because I think that's one area where I just can't shrug my shoulders and say hey, it's okay, it's vampire morality they are toxic4toxic and Lestat and Louis are both making a choice.
They roped that poor girl into their mess like a couple on the verge of a breakup adopting a feral dog and though Claudia was always a far better vampire than Louis let himself be, Lestat became highly resentful of her. I know that in the flash forwards he expresses pride at the killer she was, but he showed so little of that when she was around, and her distaste for him and view of him as abusive doesn't come from nowhere.
Yes, we can say that Louis likely guilted Lestat into it to some extent (assuming a merger of the two Claudia Making flashbacks is the closest to the truth), and that Lestat was so desperately lonesome for Louis' affection that he caved or something (ie that both Lestat and Louis are idiots), but Louis at least tried to be nice and present and consistent with the girl. He failed whenever he had a dick appointment that felt more pressing, but he did care, and he made real sacrifices for Claudia's happiness whereas Lestat did a lot to squelch her and squeeze her out.
Jealousy over Louis bond to Claudia is what really ramped up Lestat behaving like a monster. A lot of his other crash-outs are divalicious and somewhat sympathetic if you are willing to accept vampire morality, but the way he punished her for Louis' lack of love for him is really hard for me to get over as a fan.
Beyond that really glaring fault in his behavior, I do see Lestat as an over-the-top, effusive, obsessively loving and dramatic figure, and I find his constancy and intensity attractive. I'm really happy that my partner identifies with Lestat and understands his motivations the most, of all the core IWTV girlies, because I want to be fucking adored and showered with affection and have my every cloudy mood accepted and have a companion for life that would gladly live in a raccoon-infested book pile depression house if it meant getting to be with me; that shit feels safe.
And it's hot. Including the darker sides to it, obviously, I'm a Hannibal girlie from way back. On one of our first dates I told my partner that I understood why Jeffrey Dahmer used to drill holes in people's skulls and I, too, would love to be able to incapacitate someone into not leaving me (or to be so incapacitated). and they also found that hot and emotionally compelling. And we are both people who have made really big dramatic sacrifices for the ones we love and don't regret feeling things so deeply. Lestat would be an annoying torment to a regular person with boundaries but if you were a certified lovergirl back?/
And can you just imagine what a pairing it would be for Lestat to be so ridiculously devoted to a partner who can own up to the fact they genuinely want all that attention, and who can be obsessive, intense, and directly demanding right back? Someone with a true vampiric willingness to separate from humanity and dogma and forge their own path, with a love of great pleasures, an ego hungry to be fed, and enough turbo charged eternal unemployed horniness they can never be satisfied? That's the type of shit I'm on. and so, in that respect, I can see the appeal of Lestat.
just found you on tumblr; i thought you might enjoy the fact that i cited you as a source for my final essay on how children are effectively the property of their parents and the transient possessions of their teachers and shift managers for my sophomore year english class lmfao
HOLY FUCK thats cool, thanks for letting me know. hope your teacher was chill
Help at one point a long time ago you posted a link to someone's online store where they sold t-shirts with fun transgender and otherwise funny slogans on them and I cannot remember enough about it to google it. But I keep getting ads for a really unfunny queer t shirt brand and it's making me wanna get one of those shirts from that store you shouted out instead. Do you remember what it was called
clothing for the refined HRT enthusiast
Autistic Advice#12: Noncompliance is a liberating social skill - but it must be developed.
If you’ve never been all that disobedient before, you can and should start really, really small. For example, you can wear the slightly revealing or gloriously trashy-looking garment that makes your mom roll her eyes and sigh despondently every time she sees you put it on. You will feel judged and disapproved of when you put it on, but that is fine. Your goal is to sit with the uncomfortable feelings and continue with your desired behavior anyway. Saunter down the steps in that highlighter-yellow Garfield crop top with your chest hair flowing over the neckline, and harness as much courage as you can muster. It’s okay if you feel like a beacon of sin. Just keep it moving. Your emotions are not the target here. Your behavior is. You can feel however you are feeling in the moment so long as you keep acting like you’re free. Do you have a favorite TV show that a partner or roommate vocally hates? Try watching that show around them without apologizing or defensively joining them in mocking the program. At first, you probably won’t be able to enjoy the show while in their presence. You’ll feel self-conscious about everything they find annoying or cringe-inducing about the show, and so focused on their reactions that you can’t relax. That’s okay. Allow those feelings of embarrassment and guilt to exist and pass through you without giving up. In time, you will be able to ignore these reactions more, and enjoy the activity. You want to see the needle of discomfort moving down just a little, like Link’s body temperature meter in Tears of the Kingdom when he puts on a breathable outfit in a hot climate. You’re not gonna go from roiling hot to frosty cold in an instant. But after a certain point, you won’t be actively in pain anymore. Things are just gonna slowly suck less, bit by bit, until they are finally okay. That’s true of most major life adjustments, I find. Probably the best way to develop self-advocacy skills while growing in your distress tolerance is simply by telling other people no. Do this without explanation or hedging. Nitpicky aunt wants to hear all about your dating life? “No, I don’t want to talk about that.” Unreliable ex-friend wants you to do them the tiny favor of moving their entire home gymnasium into a new third story walk-up? “No, I’m not available.” Manipulative shift supervisor wants to cajole you into sticking around for another three hours to close? “No.” As many advice columnists smarter than me have already intoned, “no” is a complete sentence. “No” requires no explanation. “No” is not subject to debate. “No” can be repeated over and over like a broken record if a disrespectful person acts like they can’t hear it. And you can walk away at any time to make your “no” physical and impossible to argue with, when someone has proven they don’t respect your boundaries.
you can read or listen to the full piece for free here
Feeling unsafe is not the same thing as actually being under threat — and if we mask and people-please reflexively, we are likely treating many completely harmless situations of disagreement as if they were mortal threats. It’s important to learn to distinguish between a situation where you have no freedom to speak up, and one where you can live authentically as yourself, and simply get more comfortable with not pleasing everyone. So in any situation where you are free to, try saying “no” and riding out how scary it might feel. When you first say “no” without explanation or apology, you will feel anxiety. That’s okay. In fact, you should pat yourself on the back for reaching the borders of your comfort zone. It is in this area of unfamiliar, slightly scary, yet possible action that we are able to grow. You might panic the first time you tell your spouse you’re not cooking dinner every night anymore, and he’ll have to figure out the meal planning himself, or the first time you let a call from a manager go unanswered while you’re off the clock. Great! You are training your body to recognize that nothing bad happens when somebody is a little peeved at you. You’re detaching your sense of safety from another person’s feelings, and tearing apart that enmeshment hurts the way ripping off a band-aid does.
#this article made me finally understand what distress tolerance is and why it would make sense to train it#but i have absolutely no idea how to apply this to my own life#none of the examples would work for me#i don't even mask well anymore i just go on autopilot when asked questions like ''is an 8 am appointment ok'' and say yes 😭
My recommendation for you would be to slow down the process. If your instinct is to automatically say yes, just don't say anything for a second. It's okay if the moment feels awkward. It's not a weird thing to stop for a moment and think. You can even say "I need a moment to think about that." when someone throws you a question or recommends a course of action that you aren't sure how you feel about.
If those options fail, and you still reflexively say yes, you get to change your mind! You can call back and say "I need to change the time for an appointment." You can text your friend and say "Actually, I decided I don't want to see that slasher movie, sorry." You are allowed to speak up after the fact! That is just as legitimate! If you can't access your feelings in the heat of the moment, give yourself some time and space, and then do what you wanna do.
my partner just said that he would love if a non woke version of laziness does not exist would exist so that he could recommend it to his mother who he thinks would benefit from it a lot but would immediately be put off unless it was written in business success self help boon standard. Which I thought you might find amusing in some way
my agent wants me to write a Let Them Theory level "accessible" book about not overthinking called 15% Dumber
astounded by this comment on the r/facefuck subreddit. shrimp tool.
happy shrimp tool shthursday
now is Lestat historionic? yes. very that. but bpd or even narcissistic... not as much as youd think given his whole, everything!
lestat is so bpd baddie 😛🤩
but he's actually really consistent!! just emotionally volatile! like even when he is crestfallen that Louis has hooked up w his childhood friend, the way Lestat copes with it isnt by switching up on Louis, but by filling their home with soldiers to express his jealousy at Louis choosing a soldier over him. He is thrilled that it is Louis that kills him. He spends the ensuing decades pining for Louis and waiting surprisingly patiently for him (as in, isnt invasive or destructive of his own accord, and tho of course he does participate in the trial, it isnt out of vindictiveness). he's always wanting him. He doesnt have an unstable sense of identity or shifting favorite persons. Lestat isnt a BPD girlie he is just a DIVAA
if Lestat was more BPD I'd love him more. but he doesn't have the self-protective instinct to turn on somebody or find somebody new to glom on to. he isn't conniving enough. He's some kind of weird dramatic golden retriever. as we all know it is our favorite not white white girl armand who is the true BPDer and theoretically Lestat would be what fixes her if he even liked her at all. like it is amazing how unflappable Lestat truly is. if he were BPD girl he would have run through so many more people during the decades after Louis left him
Yeah i went on this date with this guy and he was really weird about being bisexual? Like he started talking about jerking off to twinks in panties—as though I've never fujo'd the fuck out before—but I was just sitting there stunned: we're in the middle of a coffee shop and I don't think Dolores, age 67, wants to hear about the theater kid—sorry theater "barely-legal"—you're popping a boner to. So I told him to tone it down and then he tried to name drop John Waters as though he's some esoteric figure. He said (out loud!) "I bet you don't know who that is." I ended up going to the bathroom to brainstorm some excuses for bailing with the groupchat, but when I came back I heard him muttering some weird Trump impression to himself. He kept saying "She's hetero Jessica folks!"
Chris overalls probably
pseudblr does a kind of strong proclivity toward memorialization too, even for people that are kind of heels for them... kontextmaschine, max1461 (still alive), etc.
and I'm doing my part
i just made so many phone calls including ones with kind of hard to articulate requests for building contractors
The plumber didn't yell at me or call me stupid yay
lestat is so bpd baddie 😛🤩
but he's actually really consistent!! just emotionally volatile! like even when he is crestfallen that Louis has hooked up w his childhood friend, the way Lestat copes with it isnt by switching up on Louis, but by filling their home with soldiers to express his jealousy at Louis choosing a soldier over him. He is thrilled that it is Louis that kills him. He spends the ensuing decades pining for Louis and waiting surprisingly patiently for him (as in, isnt invasive or destructive of his own accord, and tho of course he does participate in the trial, it isnt out of vindictiveness). he's always wanting him. He doesnt have an unstable sense of identity or shifting favorite persons. Lestat isnt a BPD girlie he is just a DIVAA